Cargando…

Clinical analysis of ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation for recurrent colorectal liver metastases after hepatectomy

BACKGROUND: RFA is designed to produce localized tumor destruction by heating the tumor and surrounding liver tissue, especially suitable for patients who do not qualify for hepatic resection. Many studies have reported that RFA was inferior to hepatectomy in the treatment of recurrent colorectal li...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fan, Xiao-xiang, Lv, Shu-yi, Zhang, Mei-wu, Dai, Xiao-yu, Zhao, Jian-pei, Mao, Da-feng, Zhang, Yan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7171833/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32312256
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-01849-0
_version_ 1783524146274107392
author Fan, Xiao-xiang
Lv, Shu-yi
Zhang, Mei-wu
Dai, Xiao-yu
Zhao, Jian-pei
Mao, Da-feng
Zhang, Yan
author_facet Fan, Xiao-xiang
Lv, Shu-yi
Zhang, Mei-wu
Dai, Xiao-yu
Zhao, Jian-pei
Mao, Da-feng
Zhang, Yan
author_sort Fan, Xiao-xiang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: RFA is designed to produce localized tumor destruction by heating the tumor and surrounding liver tissue, especially suitable for patients who do not qualify for hepatic resection. Many studies have reported that RFA was inferior to hepatectomy in the treatment of recurrent colorectal liver metastases. However, strong evidence is lacking in the literature. This study aimed to investigate the effect and clinical outcome of percutaneous ultrasound-guided RFA and repeat hepatic resection for recurrent colorectal liver metastases after hepatectomy. METHODS: From January 2007 to January 2014, 194 patients with recurrent colorectal liver metastases after hepatectomy diagnosed in our hospital was performed, and then divided into two groups based on different regimens: repeat hepatic resection group and RFA group. The clinical data of the two groups were analyzed. After treatment, the liver function-related indexes, complication rate, survival rate, and tumor recurrence of the two groups were recorded. The difference in short-term and long-term effects between repeat hepatic resection and RFA was identified by propensity score analysis. RESULTS: The number of metastases and the proportion of left and right lobe involved by tumor and preoperative chemotherapy in the RFA group were higher than those in the repeat hepatic resection group. The clinical data showed no significant difference between the two groups after using propensity score analysis. Compared with the RFA group, the liver function of the repeat hepatic resection group was significantly improved. After adjustment for potential confounders, no significant difference in liver function-related indexes was found between RFA and repeat hepatic resection, and the incidence of complications in the RFA group was lower. In survival analysis, there was no significant difference in OS and DFS between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: RFA is a safe and effective therapeutic option for patients with recurrent colorectal liver metastases after hepatectomy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7171833
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71718332020-04-24 Clinical analysis of ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation for recurrent colorectal liver metastases after hepatectomy Fan, Xiao-xiang Lv, Shu-yi Zhang, Mei-wu Dai, Xiao-yu Zhao, Jian-pei Mao, Da-feng Zhang, Yan World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: RFA is designed to produce localized tumor destruction by heating the tumor and surrounding liver tissue, especially suitable for patients who do not qualify for hepatic resection. Many studies have reported that RFA was inferior to hepatectomy in the treatment of recurrent colorectal liver metastases. However, strong evidence is lacking in the literature. This study aimed to investigate the effect and clinical outcome of percutaneous ultrasound-guided RFA and repeat hepatic resection for recurrent colorectal liver metastases after hepatectomy. METHODS: From January 2007 to January 2014, 194 patients with recurrent colorectal liver metastases after hepatectomy diagnosed in our hospital was performed, and then divided into two groups based on different regimens: repeat hepatic resection group and RFA group. The clinical data of the two groups were analyzed. After treatment, the liver function-related indexes, complication rate, survival rate, and tumor recurrence of the two groups were recorded. The difference in short-term and long-term effects between repeat hepatic resection and RFA was identified by propensity score analysis. RESULTS: The number of metastases and the proportion of left and right lobe involved by tumor and preoperative chemotherapy in the RFA group were higher than those in the repeat hepatic resection group. The clinical data showed no significant difference between the two groups after using propensity score analysis. Compared with the RFA group, the liver function of the repeat hepatic resection group was significantly improved. After adjustment for potential confounders, no significant difference in liver function-related indexes was found between RFA and repeat hepatic resection, and the incidence of complications in the RFA group was lower. In survival analysis, there was no significant difference in OS and DFS between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: RFA is a safe and effective therapeutic option for patients with recurrent colorectal liver metastases after hepatectomy. BioMed Central 2020-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7171833/ /pubmed/32312256 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-01849-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Fan, Xiao-xiang
Lv, Shu-yi
Zhang, Mei-wu
Dai, Xiao-yu
Zhao, Jian-pei
Mao, Da-feng
Zhang, Yan
Clinical analysis of ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation for recurrent colorectal liver metastases after hepatectomy
title Clinical analysis of ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation for recurrent colorectal liver metastases after hepatectomy
title_full Clinical analysis of ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation for recurrent colorectal liver metastases after hepatectomy
title_fullStr Clinical analysis of ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation for recurrent colorectal liver metastases after hepatectomy
title_full_unstemmed Clinical analysis of ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation for recurrent colorectal liver metastases after hepatectomy
title_short Clinical analysis of ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation for recurrent colorectal liver metastases after hepatectomy
title_sort clinical analysis of ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation for recurrent colorectal liver metastases after hepatectomy
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7171833/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32312256
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-01849-0
work_keys_str_mv AT fanxiaoxiang clinicalanalysisofultrasoundguidedradiofrequencyablationforrecurrentcolorectallivermetastasesafterhepatectomy
AT lvshuyi clinicalanalysisofultrasoundguidedradiofrequencyablationforrecurrentcolorectallivermetastasesafterhepatectomy
AT zhangmeiwu clinicalanalysisofultrasoundguidedradiofrequencyablationforrecurrentcolorectallivermetastasesafterhepatectomy
AT daixiaoyu clinicalanalysisofultrasoundguidedradiofrequencyablationforrecurrentcolorectallivermetastasesafterhepatectomy
AT zhaojianpei clinicalanalysisofultrasoundguidedradiofrequencyablationforrecurrentcolorectallivermetastasesafterhepatectomy
AT maodafeng clinicalanalysisofultrasoundguidedradiofrequencyablationforrecurrentcolorectallivermetastasesafterhepatectomy
AT zhangyan clinicalanalysisofultrasoundguidedradiofrequencyablationforrecurrentcolorectallivermetastasesafterhepatectomy