Cargando…
Comparison of the new flexible tip bougie catheter and standard bougie stylet for tracheal intubation by anesthesiologists in different difficult airway scenarios: a randomized crossover trial
BACKGROUND: Incidence of difficult endotracheal intubation ranges between 3 and 10%. Bougies have been recommended as an airway adjunct for difficult intubation, but reported success rates are variable. A new generation flexible tip bougie appears promising but was not investigated so far. We theref...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7171857/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32312225 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-020-01009-7 |
_version_ | 1783524151677419520 |
---|---|
author | Ruetzler, Kurt Smereka, Jacek Abelairas-Gomez, Cristian Frass, Michael Dabrowski, Marek Bialka, Szymon Misiolek, Hanna Plusa, Tadeusz Robak, Oliver Aniolek, Olga Ladny, Jerzy Robert Gorczyca, Damian Ahuja, Sanchit Szarpak, Lukasz |
author_facet | Ruetzler, Kurt Smereka, Jacek Abelairas-Gomez, Cristian Frass, Michael Dabrowski, Marek Bialka, Szymon Misiolek, Hanna Plusa, Tadeusz Robak, Oliver Aniolek, Olga Ladny, Jerzy Robert Gorczyca, Damian Ahuja, Sanchit Szarpak, Lukasz |
author_sort | Ruetzler, Kurt |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Incidence of difficult endotracheal intubation ranges between 3 and 10%. Bougies have been recommended as an airway adjunct for difficult intubation, but reported success rates are variable. A new generation flexible tip bougie appears promising but was not investigated so far. We therefore compared the new flexible tip with a standard bougie in simulated normal and difficult airway scenarios, and used by experienced anesthesiologists. METHODS: We conducted a observational, randomized, cross-over simulation study. Following standardized training, experienced anesthesiologists performed endotracheal intubation using a Macintosh blade and one of the bougies in six different airway scenarios in a randomized sequence: normal airway, tongue edema, pharyngeal obstruction, manual cervical inline stabilization, cervical collar stabilization, cervical collar stabilization and pharyngeal obstruction. Overall success rate with a maximum of 3 intubation attempts was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included number of intubation attempts, time to intubation and dental compression. RESULTS: Thirty-two anesthesiologist participated in this study between January 2019 and May 2019. Overall success rate was similar for the flexible tip bougie and the standard bougie. The flexible tip bougie tended to need less intubation attempts in more difficult airway scenarios. Time to intubation was less if using the flexible tip bougie compared to the standard bougie. Reduced severity of dental compression was noted for the flexible tip bougie in difficult airway scenarios except cervical collar stabilization. CONCLUSION: In this simulation study of normal and difficult airways scenarios, overall success rate was similar for the flexible tip and standard bougie. Especially in more difficult airway scenarios, less intubation attempts, and less optimization maneuvers were needed if using the flexible tip bougie. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03733158. 7th November 2018. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7171857 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71718572020-04-24 Comparison of the new flexible tip bougie catheter and standard bougie stylet for tracheal intubation by anesthesiologists in different difficult airway scenarios: a randomized crossover trial Ruetzler, Kurt Smereka, Jacek Abelairas-Gomez, Cristian Frass, Michael Dabrowski, Marek Bialka, Szymon Misiolek, Hanna Plusa, Tadeusz Robak, Oliver Aniolek, Olga Ladny, Jerzy Robert Gorczyca, Damian Ahuja, Sanchit Szarpak, Lukasz BMC Anesthesiol Research Article BACKGROUND: Incidence of difficult endotracheal intubation ranges between 3 and 10%. Bougies have been recommended as an airway adjunct for difficult intubation, but reported success rates are variable. A new generation flexible tip bougie appears promising but was not investigated so far. We therefore compared the new flexible tip with a standard bougie in simulated normal and difficult airway scenarios, and used by experienced anesthesiologists. METHODS: We conducted a observational, randomized, cross-over simulation study. Following standardized training, experienced anesthesiologists performed endotracheal intubation using a Macintosh blade and one of the bougies in six different airway scenarios in a randomized sequence: normal airway, tongue edema, pharyngeal obstruction, manual cervical inline stabilization, cervical collar stabilization, cervical collar stabilization and pharyngeal obstruction. Overall success rate with a maximum of 3 intubation attempts was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included number of intubation attempts, time to intubation and dental compression. RESULTS: Thirty-two anesthesiologist participated in this study between January 2019 and May 2019. Overall success rate was similar for the flexible tip bougie and the standard bougie. The flexible tip bougie tended to need less intubation attempts in more difficult airway scenarios. Time to intubation was less if using the flexible tip bougie compared to the standard bougie. Reduced severity of dental compression was noted for the flexible tip bougie in difficult airway scenarios except cervical collar stabilization. CONCLUSION: In this simulation study of normal and difficult airways scenarios, overall success rate was similar for the flexible tip and standard bougie. Especially in more difficult airway scenarios, less intubation attempts, and less optimization maneuvers were needed if using the flexible tip bougie. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT03733158. 7th November 2018. BioMed Central 2020-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7171857/ /pubmed/32312225 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-020-01009-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ruetzler, Kurt Smereka, Jacek Abelairas-Gomez, Cristian Frass, Michael Dabrowski, Marek Bialka, Szymon Misiolek, Hanna Plusa, Tadeusz Robak, Oliver Aniolek, Olga Ladny, Jerzy Robert Gorczyca, Damian Ahuja, Sanchit Szarpak, Lukasz Comparison of the new flexible tip bougie catheter and standard bougie stylet for tracheal intubation by anesthesiologists in different difficult airway scenarios: a randomized crossover trial |
title | Comparison of the new flexible tip bougie catheter and standard bougie stylet for tracheal intubation by anesthesiologists in different difficult airway scenarios: a randomized crossover trial |
title_full | Comparison of the new flexible tip bougie catheter and standard bougie stylet for tracheal intubation by anesthesiologists in different difficult airway scenarios: a randomized crossover trial |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the new flexible tip bougie catheter and standard bougie stylet for tracheal intubation by anesthesiologists in different difficult airway scenarios: a randomized crossover trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the new flexible tip bougie catheter and standard bougie stylet for tracheal intubation by anesthesiologists in different difficult airway scenarios: a randomized crossover trial |
title_short | Comparison of the new flexible tip bougie catheter and standard bougie stylet for tracheal intubation by anesthesiologists in different difficult airway scenarios: a randomized crossover trial |
title_sort | comparison of the new flexible tip bougie catheter and standard bougie stylet for tracheal intubation by anesthesiologists in different difficult airway scenarios: a randomized crossover trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7171857/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32312225 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12871-020-01009-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ruetzlerkurt comparisonofthenewflexibletipbougiecatheterandstandardbougiestyletfortrachealintubationbyanesthesiologistsindifferentdifficultairwayscenariosarandomizedcrossovertrial AT smerekajacek comparisonofthenewflexibletipbougiecatheterandstandardbougiestyletfortrachealintubationbyanesthesiologistsindifferentdifficultairwayscenariosarandomizedcrossovertrial AT abelairasgomezcristian comparisonofthenewflexibletipbougiecatheterandstandardbougiestyletfortrachealintubationbyanesthesiologistsindifferentdifficultairwayscenariosarandomizedcrossovertrial AT frassmichael comparisonofthenewflexibletipbougiecatheterandstandardbougiestyletfortrachealintubationbyanesthesiologistsindifferentdifficultairwayscenariosarandomizedcrossovertrial AT dabrowskimarek comparisonofthenewflexibletipbougiecatheterandstandardbougiestyletfortrachealintubationbyanesthesiologistsindifferentdifficultairwayscenariosarandomizedcrossovertrial AT bialkaszymon comparisonofthenewflexibletipbougiecatheterandstandardbougiestyletfortrachealintubationbyanesthesiologistsindifferentdifficultairwayscenariosarandomizedcrossovertrial AT misiolekhanna comparisonofthenewflexibletipbougiecatheterandstandardbougiestyletfortrachealintubationbyanesthesiologistsindifferentdifficultairwayscenariosarandomizedcrossovertrial AT plusatadeusz comparisonofthenewflexibletipbougiecatheterandstandardbougiestyletfortrachealintubationbyanesthesiologistsindifferentdifficultairwayscenariosarandomizedcrossovertrial AT robakoliver comparisonofthenewflexibletipbougiecatheterandstandardbougiestyletfortrachealintubationbyanesthesiologistsindifferentdifficultairwayscenariosarandomizedcrossovertrial AT aniolekolga comparisonofthenewflexibletipbougiecatheterandstandardbougiestyletfortrachealintubationbyanesthesiologistsindifferentdifficultairwayscenariosarandomizedcrossovertrial AT ladnyjerzyrobert comparisonofthenewflexibletipbougiecatheterandstandardbougiestyletfortrachealintubationbyanesthesiologistsindifferentdifficultairwayscenariosarandomizedcrossovertrial AT gorczycadamian comparisonofthenewflexibletipbougiecatheterandstandardbougiestyletfortrachealintubationbyanesthesiologistsindifferentdifficultairwayscenariosarandomizedcrossovertrial AT ahujasanchit comparisonofthenewflexibletipbougiecatheterandstandardbougiestyletfortrachealintubationbyanesthesiologistsindifferentdifficultairwayscenariosarandomizedcrossovertrial AT szarpaklukasz comparisonofthenewflexibletipbougiecatheterandstandardbougiestyletfortrachealintubationbyanesthesiologistsindifferentdifficultairwayscenariosarandomizedcrossovertrial |