Cargando…
Deep convolutional neural networks for automated segmentation of brain metastases trained on clinical data
INTRODUCTION: Deep learning-based algorithms have demonstrated enormous performance in segmentation of medical images. We collected a dataset of multiparametric MRI and contour data acquired for use in radiosurgery, to evaluate the performance of deep convolutional neural networks (DCNN) in automati...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7171921/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32312276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-020-01514-6 |
_version_ | 1783524161915715584 |
---|---|
author | Bousabarah, Khaled Ruge, Maximilian Brand, Julia-Sarita Hoevels, Mauritius Rueß, Daniel Borggrefe, Jan Große Hokamp, Nils Visser-Vandewalle, Veerle Maintz, David Treuer, Harald Kocher, Martin |
author_facet | Bousabarah, Khaled Ruge, Maximilian Brand, Julia-Sarita Hoevels, Mauritius Rueß, Daniel Borggrefe, Jan Große Hokamp, Nils Visser-Vandewalle, Veerle Maintz, David Treuer, Harald Kocher, Martin |
author_sort | Bousabarah, Khaled |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Deep learning-based algorithms have demonstrated enormous performance in segmentation of medical images. We collected a dataset of multiparametric MRI and contour data acquired for use in radiosurgery, to evaluate the performance of deep convolutional neural networks (DCNN) in automatic segmentation of brain metastases (BM). METHODS: A conventional U-Net (cU-Net), a modified U-Net (moU-Net) and a U-Net trained only on BM smaller than 0.4 ml (sU-Net) were implemented. Performance was assessed on a separate test set employing sensitivity, specificity, average false positive rate (AFPR), the dice similarity coefficient (DSC), Bland-Altman analysis and the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). RESULTS: A dataset of 509 patients (1223 BM) was split into a training set (469 pts) and a test set (40 pts). A combination of all trained networks was the most sensitive (0.82) while maintaining a specificity 0.83. The same model achieved a sensitivity of 0.97 and a specificity of 0.94 when considering only lesions larger than 0.06 ml (75% of all lesions). Type of primary cancer had no significant influence on the mean DSC per lesion (p = 0.60). Agreement between manually and automatically assessed tumor volumes as quantified by a CCC of 0.87 (95% CI, 0.77–0.93), was excellent. CONCLUSION: Using a dataset which properly captured the variation in imaging appearance observed in clinical practice, we were able to conclude that DCNNs reach clinically relevant performance for most lesions. Clinical applicability is currently limited by the size of the target lesion. Further studies should address if small targets are accurately represented in the test data. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7171921 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71719212020-04-24 Deep convolutional neural networks for automated segmentation of brain metastases trained on clinical data Bousabarah, Khaled Ruge, Maximilian Brand, Julia-Sarita Hoevels, Mauritius Rueß, Daniel Borggrefe, Jan Große Hokamp, Nils Visser-Vandewalle, Veerle Maintz, David Treuer, Harald Kocher, Martin Radiat Oncol Research INTRODUCTION: Deep learning-based algorithms have demonstrated enormous performance in segmentation of medical images. We collected a dataset of multiparametric MRI and contour data acquired for use in radiosurgery, to evaluate the performance of deep convolutional neural networks (DCNN) in automatic segmentation of brain metastases (BM). METHODS: A conventional U-Net (cU-Net), a modified U-Net (moU-Net) and a U-Net trained only on BM smaller than 0.4 ml (sU-Net) were implemented. Performance was assessed on a separate test set employing sensitivity, specificity, average false positive rate (AFPR), the dice similarity coefficient (DSC), Bland-Altman analysis and the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). RESULTS: A dataset of 509 patients (1223 BM) was split into a training set (469 pts) and a test set (40 pts). A combination of all trained networks was the most sensitive (0.82) while maintaining a specificity 0.83. The same model achieved a sensitivity of 0.97 and a specificity of 0.94 when considering only lesions larger than 0.06 ml (75% of all lesions). Type of primary cancer had no significant influence on the mean DSC per lesion (p = 0.60). Agreement between manually and automatically assessed tumor volumes as quantified by a CCC of 0.87 (95% CI, 0.77–0.93), was excellent. CONCLUSION: Using a dataset which properly captured the variation in imaging appearance observed in clinical practice, we were able to conclude that DCNNs reach clinically relevant performance for most lesions. Clinical applicability is currently limited by the size of the target lesion. Further studies should address if small targets are accurately represented in the test data. BioMed Central 2020-04-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7171921/ /pubmed/32312276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-020-01514-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Bousabarah, Khaled Ruge, Maximilian Brand, Julia-Sarita Hoevels, Mauritius Rueß, Daniel Borggrefe, Jan Große Hokamp, Nils Visser-Vandewalle, Veerle Maintz, David Treuer, Harald Kocher, Martin Deep convolutional neural networks for automated segmentation of brain metastases trained on clinical data |
title | Deep convolutional neural networks for automated segmentation of brain metastases trained on clinical data |
title_full | Deep convolutional neural networks for automated segmentation of brain metastases trained on clinical data |
title_fullStr | Deep convolutional neural networks for automated segmentation of brain metastases trained on clinical data |
title_full_unstemmed | Deep convolutional neural networks for automated segmentation of brain metastases trained on clinical data |
title_short | Deep convolutional neural networks for automated segmentation of brain metastases trained on clinical data |
title_sort | deep convolutional neural networks for automated segmentation of brain metastases trained on clinical data |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7171921/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32312276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13014-020-01514-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bousabarahkhaled deepconvolutionalneuralnetworksforautomatedsegmentationofbrainmetastasestrainedonclinicaldata AT rugemaximilian deepconvolutionalneuralnetworksforautomatedsegmentationofbrainmetastasestrainedonclinicaldata AT brandjuliasarita deepconvolutionalneuralnetworksforautomatedsegmentationofbrainmetastasestrainedonclinicaldata AT hoevelsmauritius deepconvolutionalneuralnetworksforautomatedsegmentationofbrainmetastasestrainedonclinicaldata AT rueßdaniel deepconvolutionalneuralnetworksforautomatedsegmentationofbrainmetastasestrainedonclinicaldata AT borggrefejan deepconvolutionalneuralnetworksforautomatedsegmentationofbrainmetastasestrainedonclinicaldata AT großehokampnils deepconvolutionalneuralnetworksforautomatedsegmentationofbrainmetastasestrainedonclinicaldata AT visservandewalleveerle deepconvolutionalneuralnetworksforautomatedsegmentationofbrainmetastasestrainedonclinicaldata AT maintzdavid deepconvolutionalneuralnetworksforautomatedsegmentationofbrainmetastasestrainedonclinicaldata AT treuerharald deepconvolutionalneuralnetworksforautomatedsegmentationofbrainmetastasestrainedonclinicaldata AT kochermartin deepconvolutionalneuralnetworksforautomatedsegmentationofbrainmetastasestrainedonclinicaldata |