Cargando…
Accuracy of comprehensive PCR analysis of nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs for CT-scan-confirmed pneumonia in elderly patients: a prospective cohort study
OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess the accuracy of PCR detection of viruses and bacteria on nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs (NPS) for the diagnosis of pneumonia in elderly individuals. METHODS: We included consecutive hospitalized elderly individuals suspected of having pneumonia. At inclusion, N...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7172172/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30641227 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2018.12.037 |
_version_ | 1783524204701810688 |
---|---|
author | Prendki, V. Huttner, B. Marti, C. Mamin, A. Fubini, P.E. Meynet, M.P. Scheffler, M. Montet, X. Janssens, J.P. Reny, J.L. Kaiser, L. Garin, N. Stirnemann, J. |
author_facet | Prendki, V. Huttner, B. Marti, C. Mamin, A. Fubini, P.E. Meynet, M.P. Scheffler, M. Montet, X. Janssens, J.P. Reny, J.L. Kaiser, L. Garin, N. Stirnemann, J. |
author_sort | Prendki, V. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess the accuracy of PCR detection of viruses and bacteria on nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs (NPS) for the diagnosis of pneumonia in elderly individuals. METHODS: We included consecutive hospitalized elderly individuals suspected of having pneumonia. At inclusion, NPS were collected from all participants and tested by PCR for the presence of viral and bacterial respiratory pathogens (index test, defined as comprehensive molecular testing). Routine diagnostic tests (blood and sputum culture, urine antigen detection) were also performed. The reference standard was the presence of pneumonia on a low-dose CT scan as assessed by two independent expert radiologists. RESULTS: The diagnosis of pneumonia was confirmed in 127 of 199 (64%) included patients (mean age 83 years, community-acquired pneumonia in 105 (83%)). A pathogen was identified by comprehensive molecular testing in 114 patients (57%) and by routine methods in 22 (11%). Comprehensive molecular testing was positive for viruses in 62 patients (31%) and for bacteria in 73 (37%). The sensitivity and specificity were 61% (95% CI 53%–69%) and 50% (95% CI 39%–61%) for comprehensive molecular testing, and 14% (95% CI 82%–21%) and 94% (95% CI 86%–98%) for routine testing, respectively. Positive likelihood ratio was 2.55 for routine methods and 1.23 for comprehensive molecular testing. CONCLUSION: Comprehensive molecular testing of NPS increases the number of pathogens detected compared with routine methods, but results are poorly predictive of the presence of pneumonia. Hence, comprehensive molecular testing is unlikely to impact clinical decision-making (NCT02467192). CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT02467192. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7172172 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71721722020-04-22 Accuracy of comprehensive PCR analysis of nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs for CT-scan-confirmed pneumonia in elderly patients: a prospective cohort study Prendki, V. Huttner, B. Marti, C. Mamin, A. Fubini, P.E. Meynet, M.P. Scheffler, M. Montet, X. Janssens, J.P. Reny, J.L. Kaiser, L. Garin, N. Stirnemann, J. Clin Microbiol Infect Original Article OBJECTIVES: We aimed to assess the accuracy of PCR detection of viruses and bacteria on nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs (NPS) for the diagnosis of pneumonia in elderly individuals. METHODS: We included consecutive hospitalized elderly individuals suspected of having pneumonia. At inclusion, NPS were collected from all participants and tested by PCR for the presence of viral and bacterial respiratory pathogens (index test, defined as comprehensive molecular testing). Routine diagnostic tests (blood and sputum culture, urine antigen detection) were also performed. The reference standard was the presence of pneumonia on a low-dose CT scan as assessed by two independent expert radiologists. RESULTS: The diagnosis of pneumonia was confirmed in 127 of 199 (64%) included patients (mean age 83 years, community-acquired pneumonia in 105 (83%)). A pathogen was identified by comprehensive molecular testing in 114 patients (57%) and by routine methods in 22 (11%). Comprehensive molecular testing was positive for viruses in 62 patients (31%) and for bacteria in 73 (37%). The sensitivity and specificity were 61% (95% CI 53%–69%) and 50% (95% CI 39%–61%) for comprehensive molecular testing, and 14% (95% CI 82%–21%) and 94% (95% CI 86%–98%) for routine testing, respectively. Positive likelihood ratio was 2.55 for routine methods and 1.23 for comprehensive molecular testing. CONCLUSION: Comprehensive molecular testing of NPS increases the number of pathogens detected compared with routine methods, but results are poorly predictive of the presence of pneumonia. Hence, comprehensive molecular testing is unlikely to impact clinical decision-making (NCT02467192). CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT02467192. The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases. 2019-09 2019-01-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7172172/ /pubmed/30641227 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2018.12.037 Text en © 2019 The Author(s) Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Prendki, V. Huttner, B. Marti, C. Mamin, A. Fubini, P.E. Meynet, M.P. Scheffler, M. Montet, X. Janssens, J.P. Reny, J.L. Kaiser, L. Garin, N. Stirnemann, J. Accuracy of comprehensive PCR analysis of nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs for CT-scan-confirmed pneumonia in elderly patients: a prospective cohort study |
title | Accuracy of comprehensive PCR analysis of nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs for CT-scan-confirmed pneumonia in elderly patients: a prospective cohort study |
title_full | Accuracy of comprehensive PCR analysis of nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs for CT-scan-confirmed pneumonia in elderly patients: a prospective cohort study |
title_fullStr | Accuracy of comprehensive PCR analysis of nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs for CT-scan-confirmed pneumonia in elderly patients: a prospective cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Accuracy of comprehensive PCR analysis of nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs for CT-scan-confirmed pneumonia in elderly patients: a prospective cohort study |
title_short | Accuracy of comprehensive PCR analysis of nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs for CT-scan-confirmed pneumonia in elderly patients: a prospective cohort study |
title_sort | accuracy of comprehensive pcr analysis of nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs for ct-scan-confirmed pneumonia in elderly patients: a prospective cohort study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7172172/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30641227 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2018.12.037 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT prendkiv accuracyofcomprehensivepcranalysisofnasopharyngealandoropharyngealswabsforctscanconfirmedpneumoniainelderlypatientsaprospectivecohortstudy AT huttnerb accuracyofcomprehensivepcranalysisofnasopharyngealandoropharyngealswabsforctscanconfirmedpneumoniainelderlypatientsaprospectivecohortstudy AT martic accuracyofcomprehensivepcranalysisofnasopharyngealandoropharyngealswabsforctscanconfirmedpneumoniainelderlypatientsaprospectivecohortstudy AT mamina accuracyofcomprehensivepcranalysisofnasopharyngealandoropharyngealswabsforctscanconfirmedpneumoniainelderlypatientsaprospectivecohortstudy AT fubinipe accuracyofcomprehensivepcranalysisofnasopharyngealandoropharyngealswabsforctscanconfirmedpneumoniainelderlypatientsaprospectivecohortstudy AT meynetmp accuracyofcomprehensivepcranalysisofnasopharyngealandoropharyngealswabsforctscanconfirmedpneumoniainelderlypatientsaprospectivecohortstudy AT schefflerm accuracyofcomprehensivepcranalysisofnasopharyngealandoropharyngealswabsforctscanconfirmedpneumoniainelderlypatientsaprospectivecohortstudy AT montetx accuracyofcomprehensivepcranalysisofnasopharyngealandoropharyngealswabsforctscanconfirmedpneumoniainelderlypatientsaprospectivecohortstudy AT janssensjp accuracyofcomprehensivepcranalysisofnasopharyngealandoropharyngealswabsforctscanconfirmedpneumoniainelderlypatientsaprospectivecohortstudy AT renyjl accuracyofcomprehensivepcranalysisofnasopharyngealandoropharyngealswabsforctscanconfirmedpneumoniainelderlypatientsaprospectivecohortstudy AT kaiserl accuracyofcomprehensivepcranalysisofnasopharyngealandoropharyngealswabsforctscanconfirmedpneumoniainelderlypatientsaprospectivecohortstudy AT garinn accuracyofcomprehensivepcranalysisofnasopharyngealandoropharyngealswabsforctscanconfirmedpneumoniainelderlypatientsaprospectivecohortstudy AT stirnemannj accuracyofcomprehensivepcranalysisofnasopharyngealandoropharyngealswabsforctscanconfirmedpneumoniainelderlypatientsaprospectivecohortstudy |