Cargando…
Evaluation of multiple test methods for the detection of the novel 2009 influenza A (H1N1) during the New York City outbreak
BACKGROUND: In response to the novel influenza A H1N1 outbreak in the NY City area, 6090 patient samples were submitted over a 5-week period for a total of 14,114 viral diagnostic tests, including rapid antigen, direct immunofluorescence (DFA), viral culture and PCR. Little was known about the perfo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier B.V.
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7172175/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19540158 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2009.06.005 |
_version_ | 1783524205406453760 |
---|---|
author | Ginocchio, Christine C. Zhang, Frank Manji, Ryhana Arora, Suman Bornfreund, Mark Falk, Leon Lotlikar, Madhavi Kowerska, Margaret Becker, George Korologos, Diamanto de Geronimo, Marcella Crawford, James M. |
author_facet | Ginocchio, Christine C. Zhang, Frank Manji, Ryhana Arora, Suman Bornfreund, Mark Falk, Leon Lotlikar, Madhavi Kowerska, Margaret Becker, George Korologos, Diamanto de Geronimo, Marcella Crawford, James M. |
author_sort | Ginocchio, Christine C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In response to the novel influenza A H1N1 outbreak in the NY City area, 6090 patient samples were submitted over a 5-week period for a total of 14,114 viral diagnostic tests, including rapid antigen, direct immunofluorescence (DFA), viral culture and PCR. Little was known about the performance of the assays for the detection of novel H1N1 in the background of seasonal H1N1, H3N2 and other circulating respiratory viruses. In addition, subtyping influenza A became critical for the identification of high risk and/or hospitalized patients with novel H1N1 infection and for monitoring the spread of the outbreak. STUDY DESIGN: This study analyzed the performances of the BinaxNOW Influenza A&B test (BinaxNOW), the 3M Rapid Detection Flu A + B test (3MA + B), direct immunofluorescence, R-Mix culture and the Luminex xTAG Respiratory Virus Panel (RVP) for the detection of seasonal influenza, novel H1N1 and other respiratory viruses. RVP was also evaluated for its ability to differentiate seasonal H1N1, H3N2 and novel H1N1. RESULTS: The sensitivities, specificities, PPVs and NPVs for the detection of novel H1N1, determined by comparing all four-test methods, were: rapid antigen: 17.8%, 93.6%, 77.4%, 47.9%; DFA: 46.7%, 94.5%, 91.3%, 58.9%; R-Mix culture: 88.9%, 100%, 100%, 87.9%; RVP: 97.8%, 100%, 100%, 97.3%. The individual sensitivities of BinaxNOW and 3MA + B as compared to R-Mix culture for the detection of novel H1N1 were 9.6% and 40%, respectively. All unsubtypeable influenza A specimens identified by RVP and tested with the CDC novel H1N1 specific RT-PCR assay were confirmed to be novel H1N1. CONCLUSIONS: Rapid antigen tests, DFA, R-Mix culture and the xTAG RVP test all detected the novel H1N1 strain, but with highly varied sensitivity. The RVP test provided the best diagnostic option as RVP demonstrated superior sensitivity for the detection of all influenza strains, including the novel H1N1, provided accurate influenza A subtyping and identified a significant number of additional respiratory pathogens. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7172175 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2009 |
publisher | Elsevier B.V. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71721752020-04-22 Evaluation of multiple test methods for the detection of the novel 2009 influenza A (H1N1) during the New York City outbreak Ginocchio, Christine C. Zhang, Frank Manji, Ryhana Arora, Suman Bornfreund, Mark Falk, Leon Lotlikar, Madhavi Kowerska, Margaret Becker, George Korologos, Diamanto de Geronimo, Marcella Crawford, James M. J Clin Virol Article BACKGROUND: In response to the novel influenza A H1N1 outbreak in the NY City area, 6090 patient samples were submitted over a 5-week period for a total of 14,114 viral diagnostic tests, including rapid antigen, direct immunofluorescence (DFA), viral culture and PCR. Little was known about the performance of the assays for the detection of novel H1N1 in the background of seasonal H1N1, H3N2 and other circulating respiratory viruses. In addition, subtyping influenza A became critical for the identification of high risk and/or hospitalized patients with novel H1N1 infection and for monitoring the spread of the outbreak. STUDY DESIGN: This study analyzed the performances of the BinaxNOW Influenza A&B test (BinaxNOW), the 3M Rapid Detection Flu A + B test (3MA + B), direct immunofluorescence, R-Mix culture and the Luminex xTAG Respiratory Virus Panel (RVP) for the detection of seasonal influenza, novel H1N1 and other respiratory viruses. RVP was also evaluated for its ability to differentiate seasonal H1N1, H3N2 and novel H1N1. RESULTS: The sensitivities, specificities, PPVs and NPVs for the detection of novel H1N1, determined by comparing all four-test methods, were: rapid antigen: 17.8%, 93.6%, 77.4%, 47.9%; DFA: 46.7%, 94.5%, 91.3%, 58.9%; R-Mix culture: 88.9%, 100%, 100%, 87.9%; RVP: 97.8%, 100%, 100%, 97.3%. The individual sensitivities of BinaxNOW and 3MA + B as compared to R-Mix culture for the detection of novel H1N1 were 9.6% and 40%, respectively. All unsubtypeable influenza A specimens identified by RVP and tested with the CDC novel H1N1 specific RT-PCR assay were confirmed to be novel H1N1. CONCLUSIONS: Rapid antigen tests, DFA, R-Mix culture and the xTAG RVP test all detected the novel H1N1 strain, but with highly varied sensitivity. The RVP test provided the best diagnostic option as RVP demonstrated superior sensitivity for the detection of all influenza strains, including the novel H1N1, provided accurate influenza A subtyping and identified a significant number of additional respiratory pathogens. Elsevier B.V. 2009-07 2009-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7172175/ /pubmed/19540158 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2009.06.005 Text en Copyright © 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Ginocchio, Christine C. Zhang, Frank Manji, Ryhana Arora, Suman Bornfreund, Mark Falk, Leon Lotlikar, Madhavi Kowerska, Margaret Becker, George Korologos, Diamanto de Geronimo, Marcella Crawford, James M. Evaluation of multiple test methods for the detection of the novel 2009 influenza A (H1N1) during the New York City outbreak |
title | Evaluation of multiple test methods for the detection of the novel 2009 influenza A (H1N1) during the New York City outbreak |
title_full | Evaluation of multiple test methods for the detection of the novel 2009 influenza A (H1N1) during the New York City outbreak |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of multiple test methods for the detection of the novel 2009 influenza A (H1N1) during the New York City outbreak |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of multiple test methods for the detection of the novel 2009 influenza A (H1N1) during the New York City outbreak |
title_short | Evaluation of multiple test methods for the detection of the novel 2009 influenza A (H1N1) during the New York City outbreak |
title_sort | evaluation of multiple test methods for the detection of the novel 2009 influenza a (h1n1) during the new york city outbreak |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7172175/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19540158 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2009.06.005 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ginocchiochristinec evaluationofmultipletestmethodsforthedetectionofthenovel2009influenzaah1n1duringthenewyorkcityoutbreak AT zhangfrank evaluationofmultipletestmethodsforthedetectionofthenovel2009influenzaah1n1duringthenewyorkcityoutbreak AT manjiryhana evaluationofmultipletestmethodsforthedetectionofthenovel2009influenzaah1n1duringthenewyorkcityoutbreak AT arorasuman evaluationofmultipletestmethodsforthedetectionofthenovel2009influenzaah1n1duringthenewyorkcityoutbreak AT bornfreundmark evaluationofmultipletestmethodsforthedetectionofthenovel2009influenzaah1n1duringthenewyorkcityoutbreak AT falkleon evaluationofmultipletestmethodsforthedetectionofthenovel2009influenzaah1n1duringthenewyorkcityoutbreak AT lotlikarmadhavi evaluationofmultipletestmethodsforthedetectionofthenovel2009influenzaah1n1duringthenewyorkcityoutbreak AT kowerskamargaret evaluationofmultipletestmethodsforthedetectionofthenovel2009influenzaah1n1duringthenewyorkcityoutbreak AT beckergeorge evaluationofmultipletestmethodsforthedetectionofthenovel2009influenzaah1n1duringthenewyorkcityoutbreak AT korologosdiamanto evaluationofmultipletestmethodsforthedetectionofthenovel2009influenzaah1n1duringthenewyorkcityoutbreak AT degeronimomarcella evaluationofmultipletestmethodsforthedetectionofthenovel2009influenzaah1n1duringthenewyorkcityoutbreak AT crawfordjamesm evaluationofmultipletestmethodsforthedetectionofthenovel2009influenzaah1n1duringthenewyorkcityoutbreak |