Cargando…

Evaluation of multiple test methods for the detection of the novel 2009 influenza A (H1N1) during the New York City outbreak

BACKGROUND: In response to the novel influenza A H1N1 outbreak in the NY City area, 6090 patient samples were submitted over a 5-week period for a total of 14,114 viral diagnostic tests, including rapid antigen, direct immunofluorescence (DFA), viral culture and PCR. Little was known about the perfo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ginocchio, Christine C., Zhang, Frank, Manji, Ryhana, Arora, Suman, Bornfreund, Mark, Falk, Leon, Lotlikar, Madhavi, Kowerska, Margaret, Becker, George, Korologos, Diamanto, de Geronimo, Marcella, Crawford, James M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier B.V. 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7172175/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19540158
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2009.06.005
_version_ 1783524205406453760
author Ginocchio, Christine C.
Zhang, Frank
Manji, Ryhana
Arora, Suman
Bornfreund, Mark
Falk, Leon
Lotlikar, Madhavi
Kowerska, Margaret
Becker, George
Korologos, Diamanto
de Geronimo, Marcella
Crawford, James M.
author_facet Ginocchio, Christine C.
Zhang, Frank
Manji, Ryhana
Arora, Suman
Bornfreund, Mark
Falk, Leon
Lotlikar, Madhavi
Kowerska, Margaret
Becker, George
Korologos, Diamanto
de Geronimo, Marcella
Crawford, James M.
author_sort Ginocchio, Christine C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In response to the novel influenza A H1N1 outbreak in the NY City area, 6090 patient samples were submitted over a 5-week period for a total of 14,114 viral diagnostic tests, including rapid antigen, direct immunofluorescence (DFA), viral culture and PCR. Little was known about the performance of the assays for the detection of novel H1N1 in the background of seasonal H1N1, H3N2 and other circulating respiratory viruses. In addition, subtyping influenza A became critical for the identification of high risk and/or hospitalized patients with novel H1N1 infection and for monitoring the spread of the outbreak. STUDY DESIGN: This study analyzed the performances of the BinaxNOW Influenza A&B test (BinaxNOW), the 3M Rapid Detection Flu A + B test (3MA + B), direct immunofluorescence, R-Mix culture and the Luminex xTAG Respiratory Virus Panel (RVP) for the detection of seasonal influenza, novel H1N1 and other respiratory viruses. RVP was also evaluated for its ability to differentiate seasonal H1N1, H3N2 and novel H1N1. RESULTS: The sensitivities, specificities, PPVs and NPVs for the detection of novel H1N1, determined by comparing all four-test methods, were: rapid antigen: 17.8%, 93.6%, 77.4%, 47.9%; DFA: 46.7%, 94.5%, 91.3%, 58.9%; R-Mix culture: 88.9%, 100%, 100%, 87.9%; RVP: 97.8%, 100%, 100%, 97.3%. The individual sensitivities of BinaxNOW and 3MA + B as compared to R-Mix culture for the detection of novel H1N1 were 9.6% and 40%, respectively. All unsubtypeable influenza A specimens identified by RVP and tested with the CDC novel H1N1 specific RT-PCR assay were confirmed to be novel H1N1. CONCLUSIONS: Rapid antigen tests, DFA, R-Mix culture and the xTAG RVP test all detected the novel H1N1 strain, but with highly varied sensitivity. The RVP test provided the best diagnostic option as RVP demonstrated superior sensitivity for the detection of all influenza strains, including the novel H1N1, provided accurate influenza A subtyping and identified a significant number of additional respiratory pathogens.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7172175
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher Elsevier B.V.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71721752020-04-22 Evaluation of multiple test methods for the detection of the novel 2009 influenza A (H1N1) during the New York City outbreak Ginocchio, Christine C. Zhang, Frank Manji, Ryhana Arora, Suman Bornfreund, Mark Falk, Leon Lotlikar, Madhavi Kowerska, Margaret Becker, George Korologos, Diamanto de Geronimo, Marcella Crawford, James M. J Clin Virol Article BACKGROUND: In response to the novel influenza A H1N1 outbreak in the NY City area, 6090 patient samples were submitted over a 5-week period for a total of 14,114 viral diagnostic tests, including rapid antigen, direct immunofluorescence (DFA), viral culture and PCR. Little was known about the performance of the assays for the detection of novel H1N1 in the background of seasonal H1N1, H3N2 and other circulating respiratory viruses. In addition, subtyping influenza A became critical for the identification of high risk and/or hospitalized patients with novel H1N1 infection and for monitoring the spread of the outbreak. STUDY DESIGN: This study analyzed the performances of the BinaxNOW Influenza A&B test (BinaxNOW), the 3M Rapid Detection Flu A + B test (3MA + B), direct immunofluorescence, R-Mix culture and the Luminex xTAG Respiratory Virus Panel (RVP) for the detection of seasonal influenza, novel H1N1 and other respiratory viruses. RVP was also evaluated for its ability to differentiate seasonal H1N1, H3N2 and novel H1N1. RESULTS: The sensitivities, specificities, PPVs and NPVs for the detection of novel H1N1, determined by comparing all four-test methods, were: rapid antigen: 17.8%, 93.6%, 77.4%, 47.9%; DFA: 46.7%, 94.5%, 91.3%, 58.9%; R-Mix culture: 88.9%, 100%, 100%, 87.9%; RVP: 97.8%, 100%, 100%, 97.3%. The individual sensitivities of BinaxNOW and 3MA + B as compared to R-Mix culture for the detection of novel H1N1 were 9.6% and 40%, respectively. All unsubtypeable influenza A specimens identified by RVP and tested with the CDC novel H1N1 specific RT-PCR assay were confirmed to be novel H1N1. CONCLUSIONS: Rapid antigen tests, DFA, R-Mix culture and the xTAG RVP test all detected the novel H1N1 strain, but with highly varied sensitivity. The RVP test provided the best diagnostic option as RVP demonstrated superior sensitivity for the detection of all influenza strains, including the novel H1N1, provided accurate influenza A subtyping and identified a significant number of additional respiratory pathogens. Elsevier B.V. 2009-07 2009-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7172175/ /pubmed/19540158 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2009.06.005 Text en Copyright © 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Ginocchio, Christine C.
Zhang, Frank
Manji, Ryhana
Arora, Suman
Bornfreund, Mark
Falk, Leon
Lotlikar, Madhavi
Kowerska, Margaret
Becker, George
Korologos, Diamanto
de Geronimo, Marcella
Crawford, James M.
Evaluation of multiple test methods for the detection of the novel 2009 influenza A (H1N1) during the New York City outbreak
title Evaluation of multiple test methods for the detection of the novel 2009 influenza A (H1N1) during the New York City outbreak
title_full Evaluation of multiple test methods for the detection of the novel 2009 influenza A (H1N1) during the New York City outbreak
title_fullStr Evaluation of multiple test methods for the detection of the novel 2009 influenza A (H1N1) during the New York City outbreak
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of multiple test methods for the detection of the novel 2009 influenza A (H1N1) during the New York City outbreak
title_short Evaluation of multiple test methods for the detection of the novel 2009 influenza A (H1N1) during the New York City outbreak
title_sort evaluation of multiple test methods for the detection of the novel 2009 influenza a (h1n1) during the new york city outbreak
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7172175/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19540158
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2009.06.005
work_keys_str_mv AT ginocchiochristinec evaluationofmultipletestmethodsforthedetectionofthenovel2009influenzaah1n1duringthenewyorkcityoutbreak
AT zhangfrank evaluationofmultipletestmethodsforthedetectionofthenovel2009influenzaah1n1duringthenewyorkcityoutbreak
AT manjiryhana evaluationofmultipletestmethodsforthedetectionofthenovel2009influenzaah1n1duringthenewyorkcityoutbreak
AT arorasuman evaluationofmultipletestmethodsforthedetectionofthenovel2009influenzaah1n1duringthenewyorkcityoutbreak
AT bornfreundmark evaluationofmultipletestmethodsforthedetectionofthenovel2009influenzaah1n1duringthenewyorkcityoutbreak
AT falkleon evaluationofmultipletestmethodsforthedetectionofthenovel2009influenzaah1n1duringthenewyorkcityoutbreak
AT lotlikarmadhavi evaluationofmultipletestmethodsforthedetectionofthenovel2009influenzaah1n1duringthenewyorkcityoutbreak
AT kowerskamargaret evaluationofmultipletestmethodsforthedetectionofthenovel2009influenzaah1n1duringthenewyorkcityoutbreak
AT beckergeorge evaluationofmultipletestmethodsforthedetectionofthenovel2009influenzaah1n1duringthenewyorkcityoutbreak
AT korologosdiamanto evaluationofmultipletestmethodsforthedetectionofthenovel2009influenzaah1n1duringthenewyorkcityoutbreak
AT degeronimomarcella evaluationofmultipletestmethodsforthedetectionofthenovel2009influenzaah1n1duringthenewyorkcityoutbreak
AT crawfordjamesm evaluationofmultipletestmethodsforthedetectionofthenovel2009influenzaah1n1duringthenewyorkcityoutbreak