Cargando…

Validity of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of acute pyelonephritis in comparison with contrast-enhanced computed tomography

PURPOSE: Applications of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging outside the brain have gained increasing importance in recent years, and recent studies have shown the usage of diffusion-weighted (DW) imaging in diagnosing pyelonephritis based on renal cortical and medullary apparent diffusion...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sriman, Rajasekaran, Venkatesh, K, Mathew, Cherian, Pankaj, Mehta, Shankar, Radhakrishnan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Termedia Publishing House 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7172225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32322320
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/pjr.2020.93669
_version_ 1783524215573446656
author Sriman, Rajasekaran
Venkatesh, K
Mathew, Cherian
Pankaj, Mehta
Shankar, Radhakrishnan
author_facet Sriman, Rajasekaran
Venkatesh, K
Mathew, Cherian
Pankaj, Mehta
Shankar, Radhakrishnan
author_sort Sriman, Rajasekaran
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Applications of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging outside the brain have gained increasing importance in recent years, and recent studies have shown the usage of diffusion-weighted (DW) imaging in diagnosing pyelonephritis based on renal cortical and medullary apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values. The aim of this study was to assess the validity of DW magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in comparison with contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) in diagnosing pyelonephritis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted for a period of six months in a tertiary hospital in Coimbatore. All patients with clinical and laboratory diagnosis of acute pyelonephritis, who were referred for radiological imaging (CECT), were taken into the study. Out of 112 patients with a clinical and laboratorial diagnosis of acute pyelonephritis (APN), who underwent both DW MR and CECT, diagnosis of APN was made in 100 patients based on CECT, while in 12 cases the investigation (CECT) was negative. Finally, these 100 patients were included in the study. The validity of DW MR imaging in diagnosing APN was assessed by deriving sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value in comparison with CECT findings. RESULTS: The validity report of DW MR imaging in the detection of APN showed a very high sensitivity (96-100%) and specificity (86-90%) and very low false positives (6-10%) and negatives (< 5%), and it also showed that in the areas of affected renal parenchyma ADC values were consistently lower compared to unaffected renal parenchyma. CONCLUSION: Based on the generated hypothesis, DW MR imaging of the kidneys seems to be highly sensitive and specific for the detection of focal or diffuse infections within the kidney in comparison with CECT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7172225
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Termedia Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71722252020-04-22 Validity of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of acute pyelonephritis in comparison with contrast-enhanced computed tomography Sriman, Rajasekaran Venkatesh, K Mathew, Cherian Pankaj, Mehta Shankar, Radhakrishnan Pol J Radiol Original Paper PURPOSE: Applications of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging outside the brain have gained increasing importance in recent years, and recent studies have shown the usage of diffusion-weighted (DW) imaging in diagnosing pyelonephritis based on renal cortical and medullary apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values. The aim of this study was to assess the validity of DW magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in comparison with contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) in diagnosing pyelonephritis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted for a period of six months in a tertiary hospital in Coimbatore. All patients with clinical and laboratory diagnosis of acute pyelonephritis, who were referred for radiological imaging (CECT), were taken into the study. Out of 112 patients with a clinical and laboratorial diagnosis of acute pyelonephritis (APN), who underwent both DW MR and CECT, diagnosis of APN was made in 100 patients based on CECT, while in 12 cases the investigation (CECT) was negative. Finally, these 100 patients were included in the study. The validity of DW MR imaging in diagnosing APN was assessed by deriving sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value in comparison with CECT findings. RESULTS: The validity report of DW MR imaging in the detection of APN showed a very high sensitivity (96-100%) and specificity (86-90%) and very low false positives (6-10%) and negatives (< 5%), and it also showed that in the areas of affected renal parenchyma ADC values were consistently lower compared to unaffected renal parenchyma. CONCLUSION: Based on the generated hypothesis, DW MR imaging of the kidneys seems to be highly sensitive and specific for the detection of focal or diffuse infections within the kidney in comparison with CECT. Termedia Publishing House 2020-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7172225/ /pubmed/32322320 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/pjr.2020.93669 Text en Copyright © Polish Medical Society of Radiology 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0). License allowing third parties to download articles and share them with others as long as they credit the authors and the publisher, but without permission to change them in any way or use them commercially.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Sriman, Rajasekaran
Venkatesh, K
Mathew, Cherian
Pankaj, Mehta
Shankar, Radhakrishnan
Validity of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of acute pyelonephritis in comparison with contrast-enhanced computed tomography
title Validity of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of acute pyelonephritis in comparison with contrast-enhanced computed tomography
title_full Validity of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of acute pyelonephritis in comparison with contrast-enhanced computed tomography
title_fullStr Validity of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of acute pyelonephritis in comparison with contrast-enhanced computed tomography
title_full_unstemmed Validity of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of acute pyelonephritis in comparison with contrast-enhanced computed tomography
title_short Validity of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of acute pyelonephritis in comparison with contrast-enhanced computed tomography
title_sort validity of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of acute pyelonephritis in comparison with contrast-enhanced computed tomography
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7172225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32322320
http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/pjr.2020.93669
work_keys_str_mv AT srimanrajasekaran validityofdiffusionweightedmagneticresonanceimagingintheevaluationofacutepyelonephritisincomparisonwithcontrastenhancedcomputedtomography
AT venkateshk validityofdiffusionweightedmagneticresonanceimagingintheevaluationofacutepyelonephritisincomparisonwithcontrastenhancedcomputedtomography
AT mathewcherian validityofdiffusionweightedmagneticresonanceimagingintheevaluationofacutepyelonephritisincomparisonwithcontrastenhancedcomputedtomography
AT pankajmehta validityofdiffusionweightedmagneticresonanceimagingintheevaluationofacutepyelonephritisincomparisonwithcontrastenhancedcomputedtomography
AT shankarradhakrishnan validityofdiffusionweightedmagneticresonanceimagingintheevaluationofacutepyelonephritisincomparisonwithcontrastenhancedcomputedtomography