Cargando…

Comparative effects of in ovo versus subcutaneous administration of the Marek's disease vaccine and pre-placement holding time on the processing yield of Ross 708 broilers,,

Effects of the in ovo (i.o.) or subcutaneous (s.c.) method of administration (moa) of the Marek's disease (MD) vaccine and 4 or 18 h pre-placement holding time (pht) on the processing yield of male broilers through 49 d of age (doa) were investigated. Ross 708 broiler hatching eggs (3,900) were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peebles, E.D., Barbosa, T.M., Cummings, T.S., Dickson, J., Womack, S.K., Gerard, P.D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Poultry Science Association Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7172885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29050405
http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pex201
_version_ 1783524344535711744
author Peebles, E.D.
Barbosa, T.M.
Cummings, T.S.
Dickson, J.
Womack, S.K.
Gerard, P.D.
author_facet Peebles, E.D.
Barbosa, T.M.
Cummings, T.S.
Dickson, J.
Womack, S.K.
Gerard, P.D.
author_sort Peebles, E.D.
collection PubMed
description Effects of the in ovo (i.o.) or subcutaneous (s.c.) method of administration (moa) of the Marek's disease (MD) vaccine and 4 or 18 h pre-placement holding time (pht) on the processing yield of male broilers through 49 d of age (doa) were investigated. Ross 708 broiler hatching eggs (3,900) were either i.o.-vaccinated at 18 d of incubation or chicks from eggs that were not i.o.-vaccinated were s.c.-vaccinated at hatch. The i.o. injections (50 μL) were delivered by a commercial multi-egg injector and s.c. injections (200 μL) were delivered by an automatic pneumatic s.c. injector. The pht was imposed on chicks after vaccination. Sixteen birds were initially assigned to each of 15 replicate floor pens belonging to each of the moa and pht combination groups and were grown out through 48 doa. At 48 doa, 6 birds were randomly selected from each replicate pen and were weighed and fasted for 16 h before being processed. At 49 doa, whole carcass, fat pad, breast muscle, and tenders muscles weights were recorded. Whole carcass weight as a percentage of live BW, and fat pad, breast muscle, and tenders muscles weights as percentages of both live and whole carcass weights were calculated. Upon subjection of the data to a 2 × 2 factorial analysis, only a main effect due to moa was observed for tenders muscles weight as a percentage of live and whole carcass weights. Tenders muscles weight as a percentage of both live (P ≤ 0.010) and whole carcass (P ≤ 0.004) weight was higher in birds hatched from eggs that received i.o. rather than s.c. vaccinations. In conclusion, in comparison to s.c. vaccination, i.o. vaccination increased relative tenders weight yield, whether or not broilers were held for 4 or 18 h prior to placement. Therefore, with regard to broiler processing yield, i.o. and s.c. vaccinations were safe for the administration of the MD vaccine, with i.o. vaccination displaying a slight potential advantage.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7172885
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Poultry Science Association Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71728852020-04-22 Comparative effects of in ovo versus subcutaneous administration of the Marek's disease vaccine and pre-placement holding time on the processing yield of Ross 708 broilers,, Peebles, E.D. Barbosa, T.M. Cummings, T.S. Dickson, J. Womack, S.K. Gerard, P.D. Poult Sci Article Effects of the in ovo (i.o.) or subcutaneous (s.c.) method of administration (moa) of the Marek's disease (MD) vaccine and 4 or 18 h pre-placement holding time (pht) on the processing yield of male broilers through 49 d of age (doa) were investigated. Ross 708 broiler hatching eggs (3,900) were either i.o.-vaccinated at 18 d of incubation or chicks from eggs that were not i.o.-vaccinated were s.c.-vaccinated at hatch. The i.o. injections (50 μL) were delivered by a commercial multi-egg injector and s.c. injections (200 μL) were delivered by an automatic pneumatic s.c. injector. The pht was imposed on chicks after vaccination. Sixteen birds were initially assigned to each of 15 replicate floor pens belonging to each of the moa and pht combination groups and were grown out through 48 doa. At 48 doa, 6 birds were randomly selected from each replicate pen and were weighed and fasted for 16 h before being processed. At 49 doa, whole carcass, fat pad, breast muscle, and tenders muscles weights were recorded. Whole carcass weight as a percentage of live BW, and fat pad, breast muscle, and tenders muscles weights as percentages of both live and whole carcass weights were calculated. Upon subjection of the data to a 2 × 2 factorial analysis, only a main effect due to moa was observed for tenders muscles weight as a percentage of live and whole carcass weights. Tenders muscles weight as a percentage of both live (P ≤ 0.010) and whole carcass (P ≤ 0.004) weight was higher in birds hatched from eggs that received i.o. rather than s.c. vaccinations. In conclusion, in comparison to s.c. vaccination, i.o. vaccination increased relative tenders weight yield, whether or not broilers were held for 4 or 18 h prior to placement. Therefore, with regard to broiler processing yield, i.o. and s.c. vaccinations were safe for the administration of the MD vaccine, with i.o. vaccination displaying a slight potential advantage. Poultry Science Association Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. 2017-11-01 2019-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7172885/ /pubmed/29050405 http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pex201 Text en © 2017 Poultry Science Association Inc. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Peebles, E.D.
Barbosa, T.M.
Cummings, T.S.
Dickson, J.
Womack, S.K.
Gerard, P.D.
Comparative effects of in ovo versus subcutaneous administration of the Marek's disease vaccine and pre-placement holding time on the processing yield of Ross 708 broilers,,
title Comparative effects of in ovo versus subcutaneous administration of the Marek's disease vaccine and pre-placement holding time on the processing yield of Ross 708 broilers,,
title_full Comparative effects of in ovo versus subcutaneous administration of the Marek's disease vaccine and pre-placement holding time on the processing yield of Ross 708 broilers,,
title_fullStr Comparative effects of in ovo versus subcutaneous administration of the Marek's disease vaccine and pre-placement holding time on the processing yield of Ross 708 broilers,,
title_full_unstemmed Comparative effects of in ovo versus subcutaneous administration of the Marek's disease vaccine and pre-placement holding time on the processing yield of Ross 708 broilers,,
title_short Comparative effects of in ovo versus subcutaneous administration of the Marek's disease vaccine and pre-placement holding time on the processing yield of Ross 708 broilers,,
title_sort comparative effects of in ovo versus subcutaneous administration of the marek's disease vaccine and pre-placement holding time on the processing yield of ross 708 broilers,,
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7172885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29050405
http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/ps/pex201
work_keys_str_mv AT peeblesed comparativeeffectsofinovoversussubcutaneousadministrationofthemareksdiseasevaccineandpreplacementholdingtimeontheprocessingyieldofross708broilers
AT barbosatm comparativeeffectsofinovoversussubcutaneousadministrationofthemareksdiseasevaccineandpreplacementholdingtimeontheprocessingyieldofross708broilers
AT cummingsts comparativeeffectsofinovoversussubcutaneousadministrationofthemareksdiseasevaccineandpreplacementholdingtimeontheprocessingyieldofross708broilers
AT dicksonj comparativeeffectsofinovoversussubcutaneousadministrationofthemareksdiseasevaccineandpreplacementholdingtimeontheprocessingyieldofross708broilers
AT womacksk comparativeeffectsofinovoversussubcutaneousadministrationofthemareksdiseasevaccineandpreplacementholdingtimeontheprocessingyieldofross708broilers
AT gerardpd comparativeeffectsofinovoversussubcutaneousadministrationofthemareksdiseasevaccineandpreplacementholdingtimeontheprocessingyieldofross708broilers