Cargando…
Neural Monitoring for Robotic Abdominal Wall Reconstruction
INTRODUCTION: Positioning-related neural injuries are an inherent risk in surgery, particularly in robotic-assisted abdominal wall reconstruction because of unique patient positioning and increased operative times. The implementation of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring should be consider...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7173774/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32327919 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2020.00009 |
_version_ | 1783524508112519168 |
---|---|
author | Halpern, David K. Liu, Helen H. Howell, Raelina S. Halpern, Robert A. Akerman, Meredith Conlon, Joseph Weidler, Christopher |
author_facet | Halpern, David K. Liu, Helen H. Howell, Raelina S. Halpern, Robert A. Akerman, Meredith Conlon, Joseph Weidler, Christopher |
author_sort | Halpern, David K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Positioning-related neural injuries are an inherent risk in surgery, particularly in robotic-assisted abdominal wall reconstruction because of unique patient positioning and increased operative times. The implementation of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring should be considered in such cases. METHODS: This was a two-armed study with one prospective intervention group and one retrospective control group. All patients underwent robotic abdominal wall reconstruction at an academic center. The prospective arm underwent robotic reconstruction from January through July 2019. The retrospective database reviewed patients who underwent the same procedure from August 2015 through July 2018. Factors assessed included: demographics (age, gender, body mass index, comorbidities), surgical details (American Society of Anesthesiologists class, procedure, operative time, positioning), outcomes (length of stay, 30-d readmission, reoperation), and any new-onset intraoperative or postoperative neuropathy. Patients were seen in the clinic postoperatively at weeks 1 and 6. RESULTS: Ten patients were included in the prospective arm. All received intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring using somatosensory evoked potentials. They were compared with 47 patients in the retrospective arm who underwent surgery without intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring. One position-related neural response from baseline was detected intraoperatively in the prospective arm; however, there were no peripheral neurological symptoms present postoperatively. Two patients in the control group developed transient peripheral neuropathies that resolved within 6 weeks. Demographics, surgical procedures, and length of surgery were similar in both groups. The prospective group had a higher rate of preoperative neuropathy and intraoperative use of vasopressors. CONCLUSION: Incorporation of neurophysiological monitoring in robotic surgery is feasible and may lead to the prevention and reduction in positioning-related injuries. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7173774 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71737742020-04-23 Neural Monitoring for Robotic Abdominal Wall Reconstruction Halpern, David K. Liu, Helen H. Howell, Raelina S. Halpern, Robert A. Akerman, Meredith Conlon, Joseph Weidler, Christopher JSLS Research Article INTRODUCTION: Positioning-related neural injuries are an inherent risk in surgery, particularly in robotic-assisted abdominal wall reconstruction because of unique patient positioning and increased operative times. The implementation of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring should be considered in such cases. METHODS: This was a two-armed study with one prospective intervention group and one retrospective control group. All patients underwent robotic abdominal wall reconstruction at an academic center. The prospective arm underwent robotic reconstruction from January through July 2019. The retrospective database reviewed patients who underwent the same procedure from August 2015 through July 2018. Factors assessed included: demographics (age, gender, body mass index, comorbidities), surgical details (American Society of Anesthesiologists class, procedure, operative time, positioning), outcomes (length of stay, 30-d readmission, reoperation), and any new-onset intraoperative or postoperative neuropathy. Patients were seen in the clinic postoperatively at weeks 1 and 6. RESULTS: Ten patients were included in the prospective arm. All received intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring using somatosensory evoked potentials. They were compared with 47 patients in the retrospective arm who underwent surgery without intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring. One position-related neural response from baseline was detected intraoperatively in the prospective arm; however, there were no peripheral neurological symptoms present postoperatively. Two patients in the control group developed transient peripheral neuropathies that resolved within 6 weeks. Demographics, surgical procedures, and length of surgery were similar in both groups. The prospective group had a higher rate of preoperative neuropathy and intraoperative use of vasopressors. CONCLUSION: Incorporation of neurophysiological monitoring in robotic surgery is feasible and may lead to the prevention and reduction in positioning-related injuries. Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7173774/ /pubmed/32327919 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2020.00009 Text en © 2020 by JSLS, Journal of the Society of Laparoscopic & Robotic Surgeons. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/), which permits for noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not altered in any way. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Halpern, David K. Liu, Helen H. Howell, Raelina S. Halpern, Robert A. Akerman, Meredith Conlon, Joseph Weidler, Christopher Neural Monitoring for Robotic Abdominal Wall Reconstruction |
title | Neural Monitoring for Robotic Abdominal Wall Reconstruction |
title_full | Neural Monitoring for Robotic Abdominal Wall Reconstruction |
title_fullStr | Neural Monitoring for Robotic Abdominal Wall Reconstruction |
title_full_unstemmed | Neural Monitoring for Robotic Abdominal Wall Reconstruction |
title_short | Neural Monitoring for Robotic Abdominal Wall Reconstruction |
title_sort | neural monitoring for robotic abdominal wall reconstruction |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7173774/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32327919 http://dx.doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2020.00009 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT halperndavidk neuralmonitoringforroboticabdominalwallreconstruction AT liuhelenh neuralmonitoringforroboticabdominalwallreconstruction AT howellraelinas neuralmonitoringforroboticabdominalwallreconstruction AT halpernroberta neuralmonitoringforroboticabdominalwallreconstruction AT akermanmeredith neuralmonitoringforroboticabdominalwallreconstruction AT conlonjoseph neuralmonitoringforroboticabdominalwallreconstruction AT weidlerchristopher neuralmonitoringforroboticabdominalwallreconstruction |