Cargando…

Pharmacological treatment of depression: A systematic review comparing clinical practice guideline recommendations

Depression affects over 300 million individuals worldwide and is responsible for most of the 800,000 annual suicides. Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for treatment of depression, founded on scientific evidence, are essential to improve patient care. However, economic and sociocultural factors ma...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gabriel, Franciele Cordeiro, de Melo, Daniela Oliveira, Fráguas, Renério, Leite-Santos, Nathália Celini, Mantovani da Silva, Rafael Augusto, Ribeiro, Eliane
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7173786/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32315333
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231700
_version_ 1783524510967791616
author Gabriel, Franciele Cordeiro
de Melo, Daniela Oliveira
Fráguas, Renério
Leite-Santos, Nathália Celini
Mantovani da Silva, Rafael Augusto
Ribeiro, Eliane
author_facet Gabriel, Franciele Cordeiro
de Melo, Daniela Oliveira
Fráguas, Renério
Leite-Santos, Nathália Celini
Mantovani da Silva, Rafael Augusto
Ribeiro, Eliane
author_sort Gabriel, Franciele Cordeiro
collection PubMed
description Depression affects over 300 million individuals worldwide and is responsible for most of the 800,000 annual suicides. Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for treatment of depression, founded on scientific evidence, are essential to improve patient care. However, economic and sociocultural factors may influence CPG elaboration, potentially leading to divergences in their recommendations. Consequently, we analyzed pharmacological recommendations for the treatment of depression from the most relevant CPGs. We included four CPGs with scores ≥ 80% for Domain 3 (rigor of development) on the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation and two other commonly used CPGs. The recommendations, their strengths, and the level of evidence were extracted from each CPG by two independent researchers and grouped as follows: (1) general recommendations for the pharmacological treatment for depression (suicide risk, acute treatment, continuation and maintenance phases, and treatment discontinuation); (2) treatment of non-responsive or partially responsive patients; and (3) treatment for subtypes of depression (chronic, psychotic, catatonic, melancholic, seasonal, somatic, mixed, and atypical). Only 50% of CPGs included recommendations for the risk of suicide associated with pharmacotherapy. All CPGs included serotonin selective reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) as first-line treatment; however, one CPG also included agomelatine, milnacipran, and mianserin as first-line alternatives. Recommendations for depression subtypes (catatonic, atypical, melancholic) were included in three CPGs. The strength of recommendation and level of evidence clearly differed among CPGs, especially regarding treatment augmentation strategies. We conclude that, although CPGs converged in some recommendations (e.g., SSRIs as first-line treatment), they diverged in cardinal topics including the absence of recommendations regarding the risk of suicide associated with pharmacotherapy. Consequently, the recommendations listed in a specific CPG should be followed with caution.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7173786
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71737862020-04-27 Pharmacological treatment of depression: A systematic review comparing clinical practice guideline recommendations Gabriel, Franciele Cordeiro de Melo, Daniela Oliveira Fráguas, Renério Leite-Santos, Nathália Celini Mantovani da Silva, Rafael Augusto Ribeiro, Eliane PLoS One Research Article Depression affects over 300 million individuals worldwide and is responsible for most of the 800,000 annual suicides. Clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for treatment of depression, founded on scientific evidence, are essential to improve patient care. However, economic and sociocultural factors may influence CPG elaboration, potentially leading to divergences in their recommendations. Consequently, we analyzed pharmacological recommendations for the treatment of depression from the most relevant CPGs. We included four CPGs with scores ≥ 80% for Domain 3 (rigor of development) on the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation and two other commonly used CPGs. The recommendations, their strengths, and the level of evidence were extracted from each CPG by two independent researchers and grouped as follows: (1) general recommendations for the pharmacological treatment for depression (suicide risk, acute treatment, continuation and maintenance phases, and treatment discontinuation); (2) treatment of non-responsive or partially responsive patients; and (3) treatment for subtypes of depression (chronic, psychotic, catatonic, melancholic, seasonal, somatic, mixed, and atypical). Only 50% of CPGs included recommendations for the risk of suicide associated with pharmacotherapy. All CPGs included serotonin selective reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) as first-line treatment; however, one CPG also included agomelatine, milnacipran, and mianserin as first-line alternatives. Recommendations for depression subtypes (catatonic, atypical, melancholic) were included in three CPGs. The strength of recommendation and level of evidence clearly differed among CPGs, especially regarding treatment augmentation strategies. We conclude that, although CPGs converged in some recommendations (e.g., SSRIs as first-line treatment), they diverged in cardinal topics including the absence of recommendations regarding the risk of suicide associated with pharmacotherapy. Consequently, the recommendations listed in a specific CPG should be followed with caution. Public Library of Science 2020-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7173786/ /pubmed/32315333 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231700 Text en © 2020 Gabriel et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Gabriel, Franciele Cordeiro
de Melo, Daniela Oliveira
Fráguas, Renério
Leite-Santos, Nathália Celini
Mantovani da Silva, Rafael Augusto
Ribeiro, Eliane
Pharmacological treatment of depression: A systematic review comparing clinical practice guideline recommendations
title Pharmacological treatment of depression: A systematic review comparing clinical practice guideline recommendations
title_full Pharmacological treatment of depression: A systematic review comparing clinical practice guideline recommendations
title_fullStr Pharmacological treatment of depression: A systematic review comparing clinical practice guideline recommendations
title_full_unstemmed Pharmacological treatment of depression: A systematic review comparing clinical practice guideline recommendations
title_short Pharmacological treatment of depression: A systematic review comparing clinical practice guideline recommendations
title_sort pharmacological treatment of depression: a systematic review comparing clinical practice guideline recommendations
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7173786/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32315333
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231700
work_keys_str_mv AT gabrielfrancielecordeiro pharmacologicaltreatmentofdepressionasystematicreviewcomparingclinicalpracticeguidelinerecommendations
AT demelodanielaoliveira pharmacologicaltreatmentofdepressionasystematicreviewcomparingclinicalpracticeguidelinerecommendations
AT fraguasrenerio pharmacologicaltreatmentofdepressionasystematicreviewcomparingclinicalpracticeguidelinerecommendations
AT leitesantosnathaliacelini pharmacologicaltreatmentofdepressionasystematicreviewcomparingclinicalpracticeguidelinerecommendations
AT mantovanidasilvarafaelaugusto pharmacologicaltreatmentofdepressionasystematicreviewcomparingclinicalpracticeguidelinerecommendations
AT ribeiroeliane pharmacologicaltreatmentofdepressionasystematicreviewcomparingclinicalpracticeguidelinerecommendations