Cargando…
Variability in engagement and progress in efficacious integrated collaborative care for primary care patients with obesity and depression: Within-treatment analysis in the RAINBOW trial
INTRODUCTION: The RAINBOW randomized clinical trial validated the efficacy of an integrated collaborative care intervention for obesity and depression in primary care, although the effect was modest. To inform intervention optimization, this study investigated within-treatment variability in partici...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7173791/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32315362 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231743 |
_version_ | 1783524512275365888 |
---|---|
author | Lv, Nan Xiao, Lan Majd, Marzieh Lavori, Philip W. Smyth, Joshua M. Rosas, Lisa G. Venditti, Elizabeth M. Snowden, Mark B. Lewis, Megan A. Ward, Elizabeth Lesser, Lenard Williams, Leanne M. Azar, Kristen M. J. Ma, Jun |
author_facet | Lv, Nan Xiao, Lan Majd, Marzieh Lavori, Philip W. Smyth, Joshua M. Rosas, Lisa G. Venditti, Elizabeth M. Snowden, Mark B. Lewis, Megan A. Ward, Elizabeth Lesser, Lenard Williams, Leanne M. Azar, Kristen M. J. Ma, Jun |
author_sort | Lv, Nan |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The RAINBOW randomized clinical trial validated the efficacy of an integrated collaborative care intervention for obesity and depression in primary care, although the effect was modest. To inform intervention optimization, this study investigated within-treatment variability in participant engagement and progress. METHODS: Data were collected in 2014–2017 and analyzed post hoc in 2018. Cluster analysis evaluated patterns of change in weekly self-monitored weight from week 6 up to week 52 and depression scores on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) from up to 15 individual sessions during the 12-month intervention. Chi-square tests and ANOVA compared weight loss and depression outcomes objectively measured by blinded assessors to validate differences among categories of treatment engagement and progress defined based on cluster analysis results. RESULTS: Among 204 intervention participants (50.9 [SD, 12.2] years, 71% female, 72% non-Hispanic White, BMI 36.7 [6.9], PHQ-9 14.1 [3.2]), 31% (n = 63) had poor engagement, on average completing self-monitored weight in <3 of 46 weeks and <5 of 15 sessions. Among them, 50 (79%) discontinued the intervention by session 6 (week 8). Engaged participants (n = 141; 69%) self-monitored weight for 11–22 weeks, attended almost all 15 sessions, but showed variable treatment progress based on patterns of change in self-monitored weight and PHQ-9 scores over 12 months. Three patterns of weight change (%) represented minimal weight loss (n = 50, linear β1 = -0.06, quadratic β2 = 0.001), moderate weight loss (n = 61, β1 = -0.28, β2 = 0.002), and substantial weight loss (n = 12, β1 = -0.53, β2 = 0.005). Three patterns of change in PHQ-9 scores represented moderate depression without treatment progress (n = 40, intercept β0 = 11.05, β1 = -0.11, β2 = 0.002), moderate depression with treatment progress (n = 20, β0 = 12.90, β1 = -0.42, β2 = 0.006), and milder depression with treatment progress (n = 81, β0 = 7.41, β1 = -0.23, β2 = 0.003). The patterns diverged within 6–8 weeks and persisted throughout the intervention. Objectively measured weight loss and depression outcomes were significantly worse among participants with poor engagement or poor progress on either weight or PHQ-9 than those showing progress on both. CONCLUSIONS: Participants demonstrating poor engagement or poor progress could be identified early during the intervention and were more likely to fail treatment at the end of the intervention. This insight could inform individualized and timely optimization to enhance treatment efficacy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov# NCT02246413. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7173791 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71737912020-04-27 Variability in engagement and progress in efficacious integrated collaborative care for primary care patients with obesity and depression: Within-treatment analysis in the RAINBOW trial Lv, Nan Xiao, Lan Majd, Marzieh Lavori, Philip W. Smyth, Joshua M. Rosas, Lisa G. Venditti, Elizabeth M. Snowden, Mark B. Lewis, Megan A. Ward, Elizabeth Lesser, Lenard Williams, Leanne M. Azar, Kristen M. J. Ma, Jun PLoS One Research Article INTRODUCTION: The RAINBOW randomized clinical trial validated the efficacy of an integrated collaborative care intervention for obesity and depression in primary care, although the effect was modest. To inform intervention optimization, this study investigated within-treatment variability in participant engagement and progress. METHODS: Data were collected in 2014–2017 and analyzed post hoc in 2018. Cluster analysis evaluated patterns of change in weekly self-monitored weight from week 6 up to week 52 and depression scores on the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) from up to 15 individual sessions during the 12-month intervention. Chi-square tests and ANOVA compared weight loss and depression outcomes objectively measured by blinded assessors to validate differences among categories of treatment engagement and progress defined based on cluster analysis results. RESULTS: Among 204 intervention participants (50.9 [SD, 12.2] years, 71% female, 72% non-Hispanic White, BMI 36.7 [6.9], PHQ-9 14.1 [3.2]), 31% (n = 63) had poor engagement, on average completing self-monitored weight in <3 of 46 weeks and <5 of 15 sessions. Among them, 50 (79%) discontinued the intervention by session 6 (week 8). Engaged participants (n = 141; 69%) self-monitored weight for 11–22 weeks, attended almost all 15 sessions, but showed variable treatment progress based on patterns of change in self-monitored weight and PHQ-9 scores over 12 months. Three patterns of weight change (%) represented minimal weight loss (n = 50, linear β1 = -0.06, quadratic β2 = 0.001), moderate weight loss (n = 61, β1 = -0.28, β2 = 0.002), and substantial weight loss (n = 12, β1 = -0.53, β2 = 0.005). Three patterns of change in PHQ-9 scores represented moderate depression without treatment progress (n = 40, intercept β0 = 11.05, β1 = -0.11, β2 = 0.002), moderate depression with treatment progress (n = 20, β0 = 12.90, β1 = -0.42, β2 = 0.006), and milder depression with treatment progress (n = 81, β0 = 7.41, β1 = -0.23, β2 = 0.003). The patterns diverged within 6–8 weeks and persisted throughout the intervention. Objectively measured weight loss and depression outcomes were significantly worse among participants with poor engagement or poor progress on either weight or PHQ-9 than those showing progress on both. CONCLUSIONS: Participants demonstrating poor engagement or poor progress could be identified early during the intervention and were more likely to fail treatment at the end of the intervention. This insight could inform individualized and timely optimization to enhance treatment efficacy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov# NCT02246413. Public Library of Science 2020-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7173791/ /pubmed/32315362 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231743 Text en © 2020 Lv et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Lv, Nan Xiao, Lan Majd, Marzieh Lavori, Philip W. Smyth, Joshua M. Rosas, Lisa G. Venditti, Elizabeth M. Snowden, Mark B. Lewis, Megan A. Ward, Elizabeth Lesser, Lenard Williams, Leanne M. Azar, Kristen M. J. Ma, Jun Variability in engagement and progress in efficacious integrated collaborative care for primary care patients with obesity and depression: Within-treatment analysis in the RAINBOW trial |
title | Variability in engagement and progress in efficacious integrated collaborative care for primary care patients with obesity and depression: Within-treatment analysis in the RAINBOW trial |
title_full | Variability in engagement and progress in efficacious integrated collaborative care for primary care patients with obesity and depression: Within-treatment analysis in the RAINBOW trial |
title_fullStr | Variability in engagement and progress in efficacious integrated collaborative care for primary care patients with obesity and depression: Within-treatment analysis in the RAINBOW trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Variability in engagement and progress in efficacious integrated collaborative care for primary care patients with obesity and depression: Within-treatment analysis in the RAINBOW trial |
title_short | Variability in engagement and progress in efficacious integrated collaborative care for primary care patients with obesity and depression: Within-treatment analysis in the RAINBOW trial |
title_sort | variability in engagement and progress in efficacious integrated collaborative care for primary care patients with obesity and depression: within-treatment analysis in the rainbow trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7173791/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32315362 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0231743 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lvnan variabilityinengagementandprogressinefficaciousintegratedcollaborativecareforprimarycarepatientswithobesityanddepressionwithintreatmentanalysisintherainbowtrial AT xiaolan variabilityinengagementandprogressinefficaciousintegratedcollaborativecareforprimarycarepatientswithobesityanddepressionwithintreatmentanalysisintherainbowtrial AT majdmarzieh variabilityinengagementandprogressinefficaciousintegratedcollaborativecareforprimarycarepatientswithobesityanddepressionwithintreatmentanalysisintherainbowtrial AT lavoriphilipw variabilityinengagementandprogressinefficaciousintegratedcollaborativecareforprimarycarepatientswithobesityanddepressionwithintreatmentanalysisintherainbowtrial AT smythjoshuam variabilityinengagementandprogressinefficaciousintegratedcollaborativecareforprimarycarepatientswithobesityanddepressionwithintreatmentanalysisintherainbowtrial AT rosaslisag variabilityinengagementandprogressinefficaciousintegratedcollaborativecareforprimarycarepatientswithobesityanddepressionwithintreatmentanalysisintherainbowtrial AT vendittielizabethm variabilityinengagementandprogressinefficaciousintegratedcollaborativecareforprimarycarepatientswithobesityanddepressionwithintreatmentanalysisintherainbowtrial AT snowdenmarkb variabilityinengagementandprogressinefficaciousintegratedcollaborativecareforprimarycarepatientswithobesityanddepressionwithintreatmentanalysisintherainbowtrial AT lewismegana variabilityinengagementandprogressinefficaciousintegratedcollaborativecareforprimarycarepatientswithobesityanddepressionwithintreatmentanalysisintherainbowtrial AT wardelizabeth variabilityinengagementandprogressinefficaciousintegratedcollaborativecareforprimarycarepatientswithobesityanddepressionwithintreatmentanalysisintherainbowtrial AT lesserlenard variabilityinengagementandprogressinefficaciousintegratedcollaborativecareforprimarycarepatientswithobesityanddepressionwithintreatmentanalysisintherainbowtrial AT williamsleannem variabilityinengagementandprogressinefficaciousintegratedcollaborativecareforprimarycarepatientswithobesityanddepressionwithintreatmentanalysisintherainbowtrial AT azarkristenmj variabilityinengagementandprogressinefficaciousintegratedcollaborativecareforprimarycarepatientswithobesityanddepressionwithintreatmentanalysisintherainbowtrial AT majun variabilityinengagementandprogressinefficaciousintegratedcollaborativecareforprimarycarepatientswithobesityanddepressionwithintreatmentanalysisintherainbowtrial |