Cargando…

Concordance of real-world versus conventional progression-free survival from a phase 3 trial of endocrine therapy as first-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer

There is growing interest in leveraging real-world data to complement knowledge gained from randomized clinical trials and inform the design of prospective randomized studies in oncology. The present study compared clinical outcomes in women with metastatic breast cancer who received letrozole as fi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Huang Bartlett, Cynthia, Mardekian, Jack, Cotter, Matthew James, Huang, Xin, Zhang, Zhe, Parrinello, Christina M., Bourla, Ariel Bulua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7173855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32315295
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227256
_version_ 1783524527950528512
author Huang Bartlett, Cynthia
Mardekian, Jack
Cotter, Matthew James
Huang, Xin
Zhang, Zhe
Parrinello, Christina M.
Bourla, Ariel Bulua
author_facet Huang Bartlett, Cynthia
Mardekian, Jack
Cotter, Matthew James
Huang, Xin
Zhang, Zhe
Parrinello, Christina M.
Bourla, Ariel Bulua
author_sort Huang Bartlett, Cynthia
collection PubMed
description There is growing interest in leveraging real-world data to complement knowledge gained from randomized clinical trials and inform the design of prospective randomized studies in oncology. The present study compared clinical outcomes in women with metastatic breast cancer who received letrozole as first-line monotherapy in oncology practices across the United States versus patients in the letrozole-alone cohort of the PALOMA-2 phase 3 trial. The real-world cohort (N = 107) was derived from de-identified patient data from the Flatiron Health electronic health record database. The clinical trial cohort (N = 222) comprised postmenopausal women in the letrozole-alone arm of PALOMA-2. Patients in the real-world cohort received letrozole monotherapy per labeling and clinical judgment; patients in PALOMA-2 received letrozole 2.5 mg/d, continuous. Real-world survival and response rates were based on evidence of disease burden curated from clinician notes, radiologic reports, and pathology reports available in the electronic health record. Progression-free survival and objective response rate in PALOMA-2 were based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1. Concordance of survival and response rates were retrospectively assessed using inverse probability of treatment weighting-adjusted Cox regression analysis. Inverse probability of treatment weighting-adjusted Cox regression results showed similar median progression-free survival in the real-world and PALOMA-2 cohorts (18.4 and 16.6 months, respectively): the hazard ratio using real-world data as reference was 1.04 (95% CI, 0.69–1.56). No significant difference was observed in response rates: 41.8% in the real-world cohort vs 39.4% in the PALOMA-2 cohort (odds ratio using real-world data as reference: 0.91 [95% CI, 0.57–1.44]). These findings indicate that data abstracted from electronic health records with proper quality controls can yield meaningful information on clinical outcomes. These data increase confidence in the use of real-world assessments of progression and response as efficacy endpoints. Trial registration NCT01740427; Funding: Pfizer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7173855
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71738552020-04-27 Concordance of real-world versus conventional progression-free survival from a phase 3 trial of endocrine therapy as first-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer Huang Bartlett, Cynthia Mardekian, Jack Cotter, Matthew James Huang, Xin Zhang, Zhe Parrinello, Christina M. Bourla, Ariel Bulua PLoS One Research Article There is growing interest in leveraging real-world data to complement knowledge gained from randomized clinical trials and inform the design of prospective randomized studies in oncology. The present study compared clinical outcomes in women with metastatic breast cancer who received letrozole as first-line monotherapy in oncology practices across the United States versus patients in the letrozole-alone cohort of the PALOMA-2 phase 3 trial. The real-world cohort (N = 107) was derived from de-identified patient data from the Flatiron Health electronic health record database. The clinical trial cohort (N = 222) comprised postmenopausal women in the letrozole-alone arm of PALOMA-2. Patients in the real-world cohort received letrozole monotherapy per labeling and clinical judgment; patients in PALOMA-2 received letrozole 2.5 mg/d, continuous. Real-world survival and response rates were based on evidence of disease burden curated from clinician notes, radiologic reports, and pathology reports available in the electronic health record. Progression-free survival and objective response rate in PALOMA-2 were based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1. Concordance of survival and response rates were retrospectively assessed using inverse probability of treatment weighting-adjusted Cox regression analysis. Inverse probability of treatment weighting-adjusted Cox regression results showed similar median progression-free survival in the real-world and PALOMA-2 cohorts (18.4 and 16.6 months, respectively): the hazard ratio using real-world data as reference was 1.04 (95% CI, 0.69–1.56). No significant difference was observed in response rates: 41.8% in the real-world cohort vs 39.4% in the PALOMA-2 cohort (odds ratio using real-world data as reference: 0.91 [95% CI, 0.57–1.44]). These findings indicate that data abstracted from electronic health records with proper quality controls can yield meaningful information on clinical outcomes. These data increase confidence in the use of real-world assessments of progression and response as efficacy endpoints. Trial registration NCT01740427; Funding: Pfizer. Public Library of Science 2020-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7173855/ /pubmed/32315295 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227256 Text en © 2020 Huang Bartlett et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Huang Bartlett, Cynthia
Mardekian, Jack
Cotter, Matthew James
Huang, Xin
Zhang, Zhe
Parrinello, Christina M.
Bourla, Ariel Bulua
Concordance of real-world versus conventional progression-free survival from a phase 3 trial of endocrine therapy as first-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer
title Concordance of real-world versus conventional progression-free survival from a phase 3 trial of endocrine therapy as first-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer
title_full Concordance of real-world versus conventional progression-free survival from a phase 3 trial of endocrine therapy as first-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer
title_fullStr Concordance of real-world versus conventional progression-free survival from a phase 3 trial of endocrine therapy as first-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer
title_full_unstemmed Concordance of real-world versus conventional progression-free survival from a phase 3 trial of endocrine therapy as first-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer
title_short Concordance of real-world versus conventional progression-free survival from a phase 3 trial of endocrine therapy as first-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer
title_sort concordance of real-world versus conventional progression-free survival from a phase 3 trial of endocrine therapy as first-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7173855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32315295
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0227256
work_keys_str_mv AT huangbartlettcynthia concordanceofrealworldversusconventionalprogressionfreesurvivalfromaphase3trialofendocrinetherapyasfirstlinetreatmentformetastaticbreastcancer
AT mardekianjack concordanceofrealworldversusconventionalprogressionfreesurvivalfromaphase3trialofendocrinetherapyasfirstlinetreatmentformetastaticbreastcancer
AT cottermatthewjames concordanceofrealworldversusconventionalprogressionfreesurvivalfromaphase3trialofendocrinetherapyasfirstlinetreatmentformetastaticbreastcancer
AT huangxin concordanceofrealworldversusconventionalprogressionfreesurvivalfromaphase3trialofendocrinetherapyasfirstlinetreatmentformetastaticbreastcancer
AT zhangzhe concordanceofrealworldversusconventionalprogressionfreesurvivalfromaphase3trialofendocrinetherapyasfirstlinetreatmentformetastaticbreastcancer
AT parrinellochristinam concordanceofrealworldversusconventionalprogressionfreesurvivalfromaphase3trialofendocrinetherapyasfirstlinetreatmentformetastaticbreastcancer
AT bourlaarielbulua concordanceofrealworldversusconventionalprogressionfreesurvivalfromaphase3trialofendocrinetherapyasfirstlinetreatmentformetastaticbreastcancer