Cargando…

Refractory Sarcoidosis: A Review

Sarcoidosis is a multi-system disease of unknown etiology characterized by granuloma formation in various organs (especially lung and mediastinohilar lymph nodes). In more than half of patients, the disease resolves spontaneously. When indicated, it usually responds to corticosteroids, the first-lin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: El Jammal, Thomas, Jamilloux, Yvan, Gerfaud-Valentin, Mathieu, Valeyre, Dominique, Sève, Pascal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7173950/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32368072
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S192922
_version_ 1783524540376154112
author El Jammal, Thomas
Jamilloux, Yvan
Gerfaud-Valentin, Mathieu
Valeyre, Dominique
Sève, Pascal
author_facet El Jammal, Thomas
Jamilloux, Yvan
Gerfaud-Valentin, Mathieu
Valeyre, Dominique
Sève, Pascal
author_sort El Jammal, Thomas
collection PubMed
description Sarcoidosis is a multi-system disease of unknown etiology characterized by granuloma formation in various organs (especially lung and mediastinohilar lymph nodes). In more than half of patients, the disease resolves spontaneously. When indicated, it usually responds to corticosteroids, the first-line treatment, but some patients may not respond or tolerate them. An absence of treatment response is rare and urges for verifying the absence of a diagnosis error, the good adherence of the treatment, the presence of active lesions susceptible to respond since fibrotic lesions are irreversible. That is when second-line treatments, immunosuppressants (methotrexate, leflunomide, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, hydroxychloroquine), should be considered. Methotrexate is the only first-line immunosuppressant validated by a randomized controlled trial. Refractory sarcoidosis is not yet a well-defined condition, but it remains a real challenge for the physicians. Herein, we considered refractory sarcoidosis as a disease in which second-line treatments are not sufficient to achieve satisfying disease control or satisfying corticosteroids tapering. Tumor necrosis alpha inhibitors, third-line treatments, have been validated through randomized controlled trials. There are currently no guidelines or recommendations regarding refractory sarcoidosis. Moreover, criteria defining non-response to treatment need to be clearly specified. The delay to achieve response to organ involvement and drugs also should be defined. In the past ten years, the efficacy of several immunosuppressants beforehand used in other autoimmune or inflammatory diseases was reported in refractory cases series. Among them, anti-CD20 antibodies (rituximab), repository corticotrophin injection, and anti-JAK therapy anti-interleukin-6 receptor monoclonal antibody (tocilizumab) were the main reported. Unfortunately, no clinical trial is available to validate their use in the case of sarcoidosis. Currently, other immunosuppressants such as JAK inhibitors are on trial to assess their efficacy in sarcoidosis. In this review, we propose to summarize the state of the art regarding the use of immunosuppressants and their management in the case of refractory or multidrug-resistant sarcoidosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7173950
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71739502020-05-04 Refractory Sarcoidosis: A Review El Jammal, Thomas Jamilloux, Yvan Gerfaud-Valentin, Mathieu Valeyre, Dominique Sève, Pascal Ther Clin Risk Manag Review Sarcoidosis is a multi-system disease of unknown etiology characterized by granuloma formation in various organs (especially lung and mediastinohilar lymph nodes). In more than half of patients, the disease resolves spontaneously. When indicated, it usually responds to corticosteroids, the first-line treatment, but some patients may not respond or tolerate them. An absence of treatment response is rare and urges for verifying the absence of a diagnosis error, the good adherence of the treatment, the presence of active lesions susceptible to respond since fibrotic lesions are irreversible. That is when second-line treatments, immunosuppressants (methotrexate, leflunomide, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, hydroxychloroquine), should be considered. Methotrexate is the only first-line immunosuppressant validated by a randomized controlled trial. Refractory sarcoidosis is not yet a well-defined condition, but it remains a real challenge for the physicians. Herein, we considered refractory sarcoidosis as a disease in which second-line treatments are not sufficient to achieve satisfying disease control or satisfying corticosteroids tapering. Tumor necrosis alpha inhibitors, third-line treatments, have been validated through randomized controlled trials. There are currently no guidelines or recommendations regarding refractory sarcoidosis. Moreover, criteria defining non-response to treatment need to be clearly specified. The delay to achieve response to organ involvement and drugs also should be defined. In the past ten years, the efficacy of several immunosuppressants beforehand used in other autoimmune or inflammatory diseases was reported in refractory cases series. Among them, anti-CD20 antibodies (rituximab), repository corticotrophin injection, and anti-JAK therapy anti-interleukin-6 receptor monoclonal antibody (tocilizumab) were the main reported. Unfortunately, no clinical trial is available to validate their use in the case of sarcoidosis. Currently, other immunosuppressants such as JAK inhibitors are on trial to assess their efficacy in sarcoidosis. In this review, we propose to summarize the state of the art regarding the use of immunosuppressants and their management in the case of refractory or multidrug-resistant sarcoidosis. Dove 2020-04-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7173950/ /pubmed/32368072 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S192922 Text en © 2020 El Jammal et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Review
El Jammal, Thomas
Jamilloux, Yvan
Gerfaud-Valentin, Mathieu
Valeyre, Dominique
Sève, Pascal
Refractory Sarcoidosis: A Review
title Refractory Sarcoidosis: A Review
title_full Refractory Sarcoidosis: A Review
title_fullStr Refractory Sarcoidosis: A Review
title_full_unstemmed Refractory Sarcoidosis: A Review
title_short Refractory Sarcoidosis: A Review
title_sort refractory sarcoidosis: a review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7173950/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32368072
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S192922
work_keys_str_mv AT eljammalthomas refractorysarcoidosisareview
AT jamillouxyvan refractorysarcoidosisareview
AT gerfaudvalentinmathieu refractorysarcoidosisareview
AT valeyredominique refractorysarcoidosisareview
AT sevepascal refractorysarcoidosisareview