Cargando…

Clinical reasoning framework for thoracic spine exercise prescription in sport: a systematic review and narrative synthesis

BACKGROUND: The thoracic spine is critical for athletic kinetic chain functioning yet widely overlooked in terms of specific evidenced-based exercise prescription. Thoracic mobility, motor control and strength are required to optimise performance in sport and minimise excessive load/stress on other...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Heneghan, Nicola R, Lokhaug, Svein M, Tyros, Isaak, Longvastøl, Sigurd, Rushton, Alison
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7173996/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32341799
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2019-000713
_version_ 1783524550550487040
author Heneghan, Nicola R
Lokhaug, Svein M
Tyros, Isaak
Longvastøl, Sigurd
Rushton, Alison
author_facet Heneghan, Nicola R
Lokhaug, Svein M
Tyros, Isaak
Longvastøl, Sigurd
Rushton, Alison
author_sort Heneghan, Nicola R
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The thoracic spine is critical for athletic kinetic chain functioning yet widely overlooked in terms of specific evidenced-based exercise prescription. Thoracic mobility, motor control and strength are required to optimise performance in sport and minimise excessive load/stress on other components of the kinetic chain. OBJECTIVE: To identify and evaluate mobility, motor control, work capacity and strength thoracic exercises for use in athletes. DESIGN: Systematic review involving expert reviewers at key stages: searches and screening (n=1), eligibility, evaluation, data extraction and evaluation (n=3). Key databases and social media sources were searched to 16 August 2019. Eligible exercises were thoracic exercises to promote mobility, motor control, work capacity and strength. A narrative synthesis enabled an outcome-based classification of exercises, with level of evidence of individual sources informing overall level of evidence for each outcome (Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine). RESULTS: From 2348 sources (social media, database searches and other sources), 38 exercises were included. Sources included images, video clips and written descriptions of exercises. Exercises targeting all planes of motion were evaluated and classified according to outcome. Exercises comprised functional and non-functional exercises for mobility (n=9), work capacity (n=15), motor control (n=7) and strength (n=7). Overall level of evidence for each outcome was level 5. CONCLUSION: This synthesis and evaluation of exercises has captured the scope of thoracic exercises used in ‘practice’. Evaluation against an expert-derived outcome-based classification provides practitioners with a framework to facilitate exercise prescription. Evaluation of validity and effectiveness of exercises on outcomes is now required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7173996
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71739962020-04-27 Clinical reasoning framework for thoracic spine exercise prescription in sport: a systematic review and narrative synthesis Heneghan, Nicola R Lokhaug, Svein M Tyros, Isaak Longvastøl, Sigurd Rushton, Alison BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med Review BACKGROUND: The thoracic spine is critical for athletic kinetic chain functioning yet widely overlooked in terms of specific evidenced-based exercise prescription. Thoracic mobility, motor control and strength are required to optimise performance in sport and minimise excessive load/stress on other components of the kinetic chain. OBJECTIVE: To identify and evaluate mobility, motor control, work capacity and strength thoracic exercises for use in athletes. DESIGN: Systematic review involving expert reviewers at key stages: searches and screening (n=1), eligibility, evaluation, data extraction and evaluation (n=3). Key databases and social media sources were searched to 16 August 2019. Eligible exercises were thoracic exercises to promote mobility, motor control, work capacity and strength. A narrative synthesis enabled an outcome-based classification of exercises, with level of evidence of individual sources informing overall level of evidence for each outcome (Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine). RESULTS: From 2348 sources (social media, database searches and other sources), 38 exercises were included. Sources included images, video clips and written descriptions of exercises. Exercises targeting all planes of motion were evaluated and classified according to outcome. Exercises comprised functional and non-functional exercises for mobility (n=9), work capacity (n=15), motor control (n=7) and strength (n=7). Overall level of evidence for each outcome was level 5. CONCLUSION: This synthesis and evaluation of exercises has captured the scope of thoracic exercises used in ‘practice’. Evaluation against an expert-derived outcome-based classification provides practitioners with a framework to facilitate exercise prescription. Evaluation of validity and effectiveness of exercises on outcomes is now required. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7173996/ /pubmed/32341799 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2019-000713 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Review
Heneghan, Nicola R
Lokhaug, Svein M
Tyros, Isaak
Longvastøl, Sigurd
Rushton, Alison
Clinical reasoning framework for thoracic spine exercise prescription in sport: a systematic review and narrative synthesis
title Clinical reasoning framework for thoracic spine exercise prescription in sport: a systematic review and narrative synthesis
title_full Clinical reasoning framework for thoracic spine exercise prescription in sport: a systematic review and narrative synthesis
title_fullStr Clinical reasoning framework for thoracic spine exercise prescription in sport: a systematic review and narrative synthesis
title_full_unstemmed Clinical reasoning framework for thoracic spine exercise prescription in sport: a systematic review and narrative synthesis
title_short Clinical reasoning framework for thoracic spine exercise prescription in sport: a systematic review and narrative synthesis
title_sort clinical reasoning framework for thoracic spine exercise prescription in sport: a systematic review and narrative synthesis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7173996/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32341799
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjsem-2019-000713
work_keys_str_mv AT heneghannicolar clinicalreasoningframeworkforthoracicspineexerciseprescriptioninsportasystematicreviewandnarrativesynthesis
AT lokhaugsveinm clinicalreasoningframeworkforthoracicspineexerciseprescriptioninsportasystematicreviewandnarrativesynthesis
AT tyrosisaak clinicalreasoningframeworkforthoracicspineexerciseprescriptioninsportasystematicreviewandnarrativesynthesis
AT longvastølsigurd clinicalreasoningframeworkforthoracicspineexerciseprescriptioninsportasystematicreviewandnarrativesynthesis
AT rushtonalison clinicalreasoningframeworkforthoracicspineexerciseprescriptioninsportasystematicreviewandnarrativesynthesis