Cargando…

Rationale of the rare cancer list: a consensus paper from the Joint Action on Rare Cancers (JARC) of the European Union (EU)

BACKGROUND: The Surveillance of Rare Cancers in Europe (RARECARE) project proposed a definition and a list of rare cancers. The Joint Action on Rare Cancers (JARC), launched by the European Union and involving 18 member states and 34 partners, promoted a wide consensus effort to review the list. PAT...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Casali, Paolo G, Trama, Annalisa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7174011/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32220947
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/esmoopen-2019-000666
_version_ 1783524553616523264
author Casali, Paolo G
Trama, Annalisa
author_facet Casali, Paolo G
Trama, Annalisa
author_sort Casali, Paolo G
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Surveillance of Rare Cancers in Europe (RARECARE) project proposed a definition and a list of rare cancers. The Joint Action on Rare Cancers (JARC), launched by the European Union and involving 18 member states and 34 partners, promoted a wide consensus effort to review the list. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A group of experts was set up, including scientific societies, member state representatives of JARC, representatives of the European Reference Networks dedicated to rare cancers and rare cancer patient advocates. The definition and the list of rare clinical entities, based on the incidence data provided by two European projects (RARECARE and RARECAREnet), were rediscussed through a consensus meeting of the expert panel. RESULTS: By consensus, it was reiterated that the best criterion for a definition of rare cancers is incidence, rather than prevalence. By consensus, the experts slightly modified the composition of the tiers of rare cancers, according to the definition based on an incidence threshold <6/100 000/year, and grouped all rare cancers within 12 families of rare cancers. Even when defined conservatively this way, rare cancers are not rare collectively, since they correspond to 10%–20% of all cancer cases. CONCLUSIONS: The list of rare cancers reviewed by JARC should be viewed as a tool in the fight against rare cancers and rare diseases. It may help to appreciate that rare cancers are cancers and rare diseases at the same time, combining issues and difficulties of both. We hope that refinements to the list and a wider understanding of its implications may contribute to increase awareness of problems posed by rare cancers and to improve quality of care in a large group of patients with cancer, who may be discriminated against just because of the low frequency of their diseases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7174011
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71740112020-04-27 Rationale of the rare cancer list: a consensus paper from the Joint Action on Rare Cancers (JARC) of the European Union (EU) Casali, Paolo G Trama, Annalisa ESMO Open Original Research BACKGROUND: The Surveillance of Rare Cancers in Europe (RARECARE) project proposed a definition and a list of rare cancers. The Joint Action on Rare Cancers (JARC), launched by the European Union and involving 18 member states and 34 partners, promoted a wide consensus effort to review the list. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A group of experts was set up, including scientific societies, member state representatives of JARC, representatives of the European Reference Networks dedicated to rare cancers and rare cancer patient advocates. The definition and the list of rare clinical entities, based on the incidence data provided by two European projects (RARECARE and RARECAREnet), were rediscussed through a consensus meeting of the expert panel. RESULTS: By consensus, it was reiterated that the best criterion for a definition of rare cancers is incidence, rather than prevalence. By consensus, the experts slightly modified the composition of the tiers of rare cancers, according to the definition based on an incidence threshold <6/100 000/year, and grouped all rare cancers within 12 families of rare cancers. Even when defined conservatively this way, rare cancers are not rare collectively, since they correspond to 10%–20% of all cancer cases. CONCLUSIONS: The list of rare cancers reviewed by JARC should be viewed as a tool in the fight against rare cancers and rare diseases. It may help to appreciate that rare cancers are cancers and rare diseases at the same time, combining issues and difficulties of both. We hope that refinements to the list and a wider understanding of its implications may contribute to increase awareness of problems posed by rare cancers and to improve quality of care in a large group of patients with cancer, who may be discriminated against just because of the low frequency of their diseases. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-03-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7174011/ /pubmed/32220947 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/esmoopen-2019-000666 Text en © Author (s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. Published by BMJ on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, any changes made are indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Casali, Paolo G
Trama, Annalisa
Rationale of the rare cancer list: a consensus paper from the Joint Action on Rare Cancers (JARC) of the European Union (EU)
title Rationale of the rare cancer list: a consensus paper from the Joint Action on Rare Cancers (JARC) of the European Union (EU)
title_full Rationale of the rare cancer list: a consensus paper from the Joint Action on Rare Cancers (JARC) of the European Union (EU)
title_fullStr Rationale of the rare cancer list: a consensus paper from the Joint Action on Rare Cancers (JARC) of the European Union (EU)
title_full_unstemmed Rationale of the rare cancer list: a consensus paper from the Joint Action on Rare Cancers (JARC) of the European Union (EU)
title_short Rationale of the rare cancer list: a consensus paper from the Joint Action on Rare Cancers (JARC) of the European Union (EU)
title_sort rationale of the rare cancer list: a consensus paper from the joint action on rare cancers (jarc) of the european union (eu)
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7174011/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32220947
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/esmoopen-2019-000666
work_keys_str_mv AT casalipaolog rationaleoftherarecancerlistaconsensuspaperfromthejointactiononrarecancersjarcoftheeuropeanunioneu
AT tramaannalisa rationaleoftherarecancerlistaconsensuspaperfromthejointactiononrarecancersjarcoftheeuropeanunioneu