Cargando…

The effect of coenzyme Q10 supplementation on oxidative stress: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials

Some evidence exists in supporting the beneficial effects of coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) on oxidative stress. Since the findings of studies over the impact of CoQ10 supplementation on oxidative stress are contradictory, this study was conducted. The aim was to evaluate CoQ10 supplementation effect on total...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sangsefidi, Zohreh Sadat, Yaghoubi, Fatemeh, Hajiahmadi, Salimeh, Hosseinzadeh, Mahdieh
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7174219/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32328242
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.1492
_version_ 1783524590018887680
author Sangsefidi, Zohreh Sadat
Yaghoubi, Fatemeh
Hajiahmadi, Salimeh
Hosseinzadeh, Mahdieh
author_facet Sangsefidi, Zohreh Sadat
Yaghoubi, Fatemeh
Hajiahmadi, Salimeh
Hosseinzadeh, Mahdieh
author_sort Sangsefidi, Zohreh Sadat
collection PubMed
description Some evidence exists in supporting the beneficial effects of coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) on oxidative stress. Since the findings of studies over the impact of CoQ10 supplementation on oxidative stress are contradictory, this study was conducted. The aim was to evaluate CoQ10 supplementation effect on total antioxidant capacity (TAC), malondialdehyde (MDA), glutathione peroxidase (GPx), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and catalase (CAT) levels using data collected from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Several databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Scopus were comprehensively searched up to 23 January 2019 to identify RCTs. A random‐effects model, standardized mean difference (SMD), and 95% confidence interval (CI) were applied for data analysis. According to the meta‐analysis results on 19 eligible studies, CoQ10 increased the levels of TAC (SMD = 1.29; 95% CI = 0.35–2.23; p = .007), GPX (SMD = 0.45; 95% CI = 0.17–0.74; p = .002), SOD (SMD = 0.63; 95% CI = 0.29–0.97; p < .0001), and CAT (SMD = 1.67; 95% CI = 0.29–3.10; p = .018) significantly. This supplementation also caused a significant reduction in MDA levels (SMD = −1.12; 95% CI = −1.58 to −0.65; p < .0001). However, the results of SOD and CAT should be stated carefully due to the publication bias. In conclusion, this research indicated that CoQ10 supplementation had beneficial effects on oxidative stress markers. However, further studies are needed to confirm these findings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7174219
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71742192020-04-23 The effect of coenzyme Q10 supplementation on oxidative stress: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials Sangsefidi, Zohreh Sadat Yaghoubi, Fatemeh Hajiahmadi, Salimeh Hosseinzadeh, Mahdieh Food Sci Nutr Reviews Some evidence exists in supporting the beneficial effects of coenzyme Q10 (CoQ10) on oxidative stress. Since the findings of studies over the impact of CoQ10 supplementation on oxidative stress are contradictory, this study was conducted. The aim was to evaluate CoQ10 supplementation effect on total antioxidant capacity (TAC), malondialdehyde (MDA), glutathione peroxidase (GPx), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and catalase (CAT) levels using data collected from randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Several databases including PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Scopus were comprehensively searched up to 23 January 2019 to identify RCTs. A random‐effects model, standardized mean difference (SMD), and 95% confidence interval (CI) were applied for data analysis. According to the meta‐analysis results on 19 eligible studies, CoQ10 increased the levels of TAC (SMD = 1.29; 95% CI = 0.35–2.23; p = .007), GPX (SMD = 0.45; 95% CI = 0.17–0.74; p = .002), SOD (SMD = 0.63; 95% CI = 0.29–0.97; p < .0001), and CAT (SMD = 1.67; 95% CI = 0.29–3.10; p = .018) significantly. This supplementation also caused a significant reduction in MDA levels (SMD = −1.12; 95% CI = −1.58 to −0.65; p < .0001). However, the results of SOD and CAT should be stated carefully due to the publication bias. In conclusion, this research indicated that CoQ10 supplementation had beneficial effects on oxidative stress markers. However, further studies are needed to confirm these findings. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-03-19 /pmc/articles/PMC7174219/ /pubmed/32328242 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.1492 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Food Science & Nutrition published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Reviews
Sangsefidi, Zohreh Sadat
Yaghoubi, Fatemeh
Hajiahmadi, Salimeh
Hosseinzadeh, Mahdieh
The effect of coenzyme Q10 supplementation on oxidative stress: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials
title The effect of coenzyme Q10 supplementation on oxidative stress: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials
title_full The effect of coenzyme Q10 supplementation on oxidative stress: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials
title_fullStr The effect of coenzyme Q10 supplementation on oxidative stress: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials
title_full_unstemmed The effect of coenzyme Q10 supplementation on oxidative stress: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials
title_short The effect of coenzyme Q10 supplementation on oxidative stress: A systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials
title_sort effect of coenzyme q10 supplementation on oxidative stress: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials
topic Reviews
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7174219/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32328242
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.1492
work_keys_str_mv AT sangsefidizohrehsadat theeffectofcoenzymeq10supplementationonoxidativestressasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrials
AT yaghoubifatemeh theeffectofcoenzymeq10supplementationonoxidativestressasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrials
AT hajiahmadisalimeh theeffectofcoenzymeq10supplementationonoxidativestressasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrials
AT hosseinzadehmahdieh theeffectofcoenzymeq10supplementationonoxidativestressasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrials
AT sangsefidizohrehsadat effectofcoenzymeq10supplementationonoxidativestressasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrials
AT yaghoubifatemeh effectofcoenzymeq10supplementationonoxidativestressasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrials
AT hajiahmadisalimeh effectofcoenzymeq10supplementationonoxidativestressasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrials
AT hosseinzadehmahdieh effectofcoenzymeq10supplementationonoxidativestressasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledclinicaltrials