Cargando…

Pitfalls in quantitative myocardial PET perfusion II: Arterial input function

RATIONALE: We aimed to define the impact of variable arterial input function on myocardial perfusion severity that may misguide interventional decisions and relates to limited capacity of 3D PET for high-count arterial input function of standard bolus R-82. METHODS: We used GE Discovery-ST 16 slice...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bui, Linh, Kitkungvan, Danai, Roby, Amanda E., Nguyen, Tung T., Gould, K. Lance
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7174279/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32128675
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12350-020-02074-8
_version_ 1783524604382281728
author Bui, Linh
Kitkungvan, Danai
Roby, Amanda E.
Nguyen, Tung T.
Gould, K. Lance
author_facet Bui, Linh
Kitkungvan, Danai
Roby, Amanda E.
Nguyen, Tung T.
Gould, K. Lance
author_sort Bui, Linh
collection PubMed
description RATIONALE: We aimed to define the impact of variable arterial input function on myocardial perfusion severity that may misguide interventional decisions and relates to limited capacity of 3D PET for high-count arterial input function of standard bolus R-82. METHODS: We used GE Discovery-ST 16 slice PET-CT, serial 2D and 3D acquisitions of variable Rb-82 dose in a dynamic circulating arterial function model, static resolution and uniformity phantoms, and in patients with dipyridamole stress to quantify per-pixel rest and stress cc·min(−1)·g(−1), CFR and CFC with (+) and (−) 10% simulated change in arterial input. RESULTS: For intermediate, border zone severity of stress perfusion, CFR and CFC comprising 7% of 3987 cases, simulated arterial input variability of ± 10% may cause over or underestimation of perfusion severity altering interventional decisions. In phantom tests, current 3D PET has capacity for quantifying high activity of arterial input and high-count per-pixel values of perfusion metrics per artery or branches. CONCLUSIONS: Accurate, reproducible arterial input function is essential for at least 7% of patients at thresholds of perfusion severity for optimally guiding interventions and providing high-activity regional per-pixel perfusion metrics by 3D PET for displaying complex quantitative perfusion readily understood (“owned”) by interventionalists to guide procedures. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12350-020-02074-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7174279
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71742792020-04-23 Pitfalls in quantitative myocardial PET perfusion II: Arterial input function Bui, Linh Kitkungvan, Danai Roby, Amanda E. Nguyen, Tung T. Gould, K. Lance J Nucl Cardiol Original Article RATIONALE: We aimed to define the impact of variable arterial input function on myocardial perfusion severity that may misguide interventional decisions and relates to limited capacity of 3D PET for high-count arterial input function of standard bolus R-82. METHODS: We used GE Discovery-ST 16 slice PET-CT, serial 2D and 3D acquisitions of variable Rb-82 dose in a dynamic circulating arterial function model, static resolution and uniformity phantoms, and in patients with dipyridamole stress to quantify per-pixel rest and stress cc·min(−1)·g(−1), CFR and CFC with (+) and (−) 10% simulated change in arterial input. RESULTS: For intermediate, border zone severity of stress perfusion, CFR and CFC comprising 7% of 3987 cases, simulated arterial input variability of ± 10% may cause over or underestimation of perfusion severity altering interventional decisions. In phantom tests, current 3D PET has capacity for quantifying high activity of arterial input and high-count per-pixel values of perfusion metrics per artery or branches. CONCLUSIONS: Accurate, reproducible arterial input function is essential for at least 7% of patients at thresholds of perfusion severity for optimally guiding interventions and providing high-activity regional per-pixel perfusion metrics by 3D PET for displaying complex quantitative perfusion readily understood (“owned”) by interventionalists to guide procedures. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12350-020-02074-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2020-03-03 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7174279/ /pubmed/32128675 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12350-020-02074-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Article
Bui, Linh
Kitkungvan, Danai
Roby, Amanda E.
Nguyen, Tung T.
Gould, K. Lance
Pitfalls in quantitative myocardial PET perfusion II: Arterial input function
title Pitfalls in quantitative myocardial PET perfusion II: Arterial input function
title_full Pitfalls in quantitative myocardial PET perfusion II: Arterial input function
title_fullStr Pitfalls in quantitative myocardial PET perfusion II: Arterial input function
title_full_unstemmed Pitfalls in quantitative myocardial PET perfusion II: Arterial input function
title_short Pitfalls in quantitative myocardial PET perfusion II: Arterial input function
title_sort pitfalls in quantitative myocardial pet perfusion ii: arterial input function
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7174279/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32128675
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12350-020-02074-8
work_keys_str_mv AT builinh pitfallsinquantitativemyocardialpetperfusioniiarterialinputfunction
AT kitkungvandanai pitfallsinquantitativemyocardialpetperfusioniiarterialinputfunction
AT robyamandae pitfallsinquantitativemyocardialpetperfusioniiarterialinputfunction
AT nguyentungt pitfallsinquantitativemyocardialpetperfusioniiarterialinputfunction
AT gouldklance pitfallsinquantitativemyocardialpetperfusioniiarterialinputfunction