Cargando…

Erysipelothrix Spp.: Past, Present, and Future Directions in Vaccine Research

Erysipelothrix spp. comprise a group of small Gram-positive bacteria that can infect a variety of hosts including mammals, fish, birds, reptiles and insects. Among the eight Erysipelothrix species that have been described to date, only Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae plays a major role in farmed livest...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Opriessnig, Tanja, Forde, Taya, Shimoji, Yoshihiro
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7174600/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32351978
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00174
_version_ 1783524656746070016
author Opriessnig, Tanja
Forde, Taya
Shimoji, Yoshihiro
author_facet Opriessnig, Tanja
Forde, Taya
Shimoji, Yoshihiro
author_sort Opriessnig, Tanja
collection PubMed
description Erysipelothrix spp. comprise a group of small Gram-positive bacteria that can infect a variety of hosts including mammals, fish, birds, reptiles and insects. Among the eight Erysipelothrix species that have been described to date, only Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae plays a major role in farmed livestock where it is the causative agent of erysipelas. E. rhusiopathiae also has zoonotic potential and can cause erysipeloid in humans with a clear occupational link to meat and fish industries. While there are 28 known Erysipelothrix serovars, over 80% of identified isolates belong to serovars 1 or 2. Vaccines to protect pigs against E. rhusiopathiae first became available in 1883 as a response to an epizootic of swine erysipelas in southern France. The overall vaccine repertoire was notably enlarged between the 1940s and 1960s following major outbreaks of swine erysipelas in the Midwest USA and has changed little since. Traditionally, E. rhusiopathiae serovar 1a or 2 isolates were inactivated (bacterins) or attenuated and these types of vaccines are still used today on a global basis. E. rhusiopathiae vaccines are most commonly used in pigs, poultry, and sheep where the bacterium can cause considerable economic losses. In addition, erysipelas vaccination is also utilized in selected vulnerable susceptible populations, such as marine mammals in aquariums, which are commonly vaccinated at regular intervals. While commercially produced erysipelas vaccines appear to provide good protection against clinical disease, in recent years there has been an increase in perceived vaccine failures in farmed animals, especially in organic outdoor operations. Moreover, clinical erysipelas outbreaks have been reported in animal populations not previously considered at risk. This has raised concerns over a possible lack of vaccine protection across various production species. This review focuses on summarizing the history and the present status of E. rhusiopathiae vaccines, the current knowledge on protection including surface antigens, and also provides an outlook into future directions for vaccine development.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7174600
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71746002020-04-29 Erysipelothrix Spp.: Past, Present, and Future Directions in Vaccine Research Opriessnig, Tanja Forde, Taya Shimoji, Yoshihiro Front Vet Sci Veterinary Science Erysipelothrix spp. comprise a group of small Gram-positive bacteria that can infect a variety of hosts including mammals, fish, birds, reptiles and insects. Among the eight Erysipelothrix species that have been described to date, only Erysipelothrix rhusiopathiae plays a major role in farmed livestock where it is the causative agent of erysipelas. E. rhusiopathiae also has zoonotic potential and can cause erysipeloid in humans with a clear occupational link to meat and fish industries. While there are 28 known Erysipelothrix serovars, over 80% of identified isolates belong to serovars 1 or 2. Vaccines to protect pigs against E. rhusiopathiae first became available in 1883 as a response to an epizootic of swine erysipelas in southern France. The overall vaccine repertoire was notably enlarged between the 1940s and 1960s following major outbreaks of swine erysipelas in the Midwest USA and has changed little since. Traditionally, E. rhusiopathiae serovar 1a or 2 isolates were inactivated (bacterins) or attenuated and these types of vaccines are still used today on a global basis. E. rhusiopathiae vaccines are most commonly used in pigs, poultry, and sheep where the bacterium can cause considerable economic losses. In addition, erysipelas vaccination is also utilized in selected vulnerable susceptible populations, such as marine mammals in aquariums, which are commonly vaccinated at regular intervals. While commercially produced erysipelas vaccines appear to provide good protection against clinical disease, in recent years there has been an increase in perceived vaccine failures in farmed animals, especially in organic outdoor operations. Moreover, clinical erysipelas outbreaks have been reported in animal populations not previously considered at risk. This has raised concerns over a possible lack of vaccine protection across various production species. This review focuses on summarizing the history and the present status of E. rhusiopathiae vaccines, the current knowledge on protection including surface antigens, and also provides an outlook into future directions for vaccine development. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7174600/ /pubmed/32351978 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00174 Text en Copyright © 2020 Opriessnig, Forde and Shimoji. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Veterinary Science
Opriessnig, Tanja
Forde, Taya
Shimoji, Yoshihiro
Erysipelothrix Spp.: Past, Present, and Future Directions in Vaccine Research
title Erysipelothrix Spp.: Past, Present, and Future Directions in Vaccine Research
title_full Erysipelothrix Spp.: Past, Present, and Future Directions in Vaccine Research
title_fullStr Erysipelothrix Spp.: Past, Present, and Future Directions in Vaccine Research
title_full_unstemmed Erysipelothrix Spp.: Past, Present, and Future Directions in Vaccine Research
title_short Erysipelothrix Spp.: Past, Present, and Future Directions in Vaccine Research
title_sort erysipelothrix spp.: past, present, and future directions in vaccine research
topic Veterinary Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7174600/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32351978
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2020.00174
work_keys_str_mv AT opriessnigtanja erysipelothrixspppastpresentandfuturedirectionsinvaccineresearch
AT fordetaya erysipelothrixspppastpresentandfuturedirectionsinvaccineresearch
AT shimojiyoshihiro erysipelothrixspppastpresentandfuturedirectionsinvaccineresearch