Cargando…

Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation Does Not Affect Verbal Memory Performance in Healthy Volunteers

INTRODUCTION: Invasive vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) improves word recognition memory in patients with epilepsy. Recent studies with transcutaneous VNS (tVNS) have also shown positive effects on various subdomains of cognitive functioning in healthy volunteers. In this randomized, controlled, crosso...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mertens, Ann, Naert, Lien, Miatton, Marijke, Poppa, Tasha, Carrette, Evelien, Gadeyne, Stefanie, Raedt, Robrecht, Boon, Paul, Vonck, Kristl
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7174665/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32351421
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00551
_version_ 1783524672026968064
author Mertens, Ann
Naert, Lien
Miatton, Marijke
Poppa, Tasha
Carrette, Evelien
Gadeyne, Stefanie
Raedt, Robrecht
Boon, Paul
Vonck, Kristl
author_facet Mertens, Ann
Naert, Lien
Miatton, Marijke
Poppa, Tasha
Carrette, Evelien
Gadeyne, Stefanie
Raedt, Robrecht
Boon, Paul
Vonck, Kristl
author_sort Mertens, Ann
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Invasive vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) improves word recognition memory in patients with epilepsy. Recent studies with transcutaneous VNS (tVNS) have also shown positive effects on various subdomains of cognitive functioning in healthy volunteers. In this randomized, controlled, crossover study, we investigated the effect of tVNS on a word recognition memory paradigm in healthy volunteers to further investigate the potential of tVNS in the treatment of cognitive disorders. METHODS: We included 41 healthy participants aged between 18 and 30 years (young age group) and 24 healthy participants aged between 45 and 80 years (older age group). Each participant completed a word recognition memory paradigm during three different conditions: true tVNS, sham, and control. During true tVNS, stimulation was delivered at the cymba conchae. Sham stimulation was delivered by stimulating the earlobe. In the control condition, no stimulation was given. In each condition, participants were asked to remember highlighted words from three test paragraphs. Accuracy scores were calculated for immediate recall after each test paragraph and for delayed recognition at the end of the paradigm. We hypothesized that highlighted words from paragraphs in the true tVNS condition would be more accurately recalled and/or recognized compared to highlighted words from paragraphs in the sham or control condition. RESULTS: In this randomized study, tVNS did not affect the accuracy scores for immediate recall or delayed recognition in both age groups. The younger group showed significantly higher accuracy scores than the older group. The accuracy scores improved over time, and the most recently learned words were better recognized. Participants rated true tVNS as significantly more painful; however, pain was not found to affect accuracy scores. CONCLUSION: In this study, tVNS did not affect verbal memory performance in healthy volunteers. Our results could not replicate the positive effects of invasive VNS on word recognition memory in epilepsy patients. Future research with the aim of improving cognitive function should focus on the rational identification of optimized and individualized stimulation settings primarily in patients with cognitive deficits.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7174665
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71746652020-04-29 Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation Does Not Affect Verbal Memory Performance in Healthy Volunteers Mertens, Ann Naert, Lien Miatton, Marijke Poppa, Tasha Carrette, Evelien Gadeyne, Stefanie Raedt, Robrecht Boon, Paul Vonck, Kristl Front Psychol Psychology INTRODUCTION: Invasive vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) improves word recognition memory in patients with epilepsy. Recent studies with transcutaneous VNS (tVNS) have also shown positive effects on various subdomains of cognitive functioning in healthy volunteers. In this randomized, controlled, crossover study, we investigated the effect of tVNS on a word recognition memory paradigm in healthy volunteers to further investigate the potential of tVNS in the treatment of cognitive disorders. METHODS: We included 41 healthy participants aged between 18 and 30 years (young age group) and 24 healthy participants aged between 45 and 80 years (older age group). Each participant completed a word recognition memory paradigm during three different conditions: true tVNS, sham, and control. During true tVNS, stimulation was delivered at the cymba conchae. Sham stimulation was delivered by stimulating the earlobe. In the control condition, no stimulation was given. In each condition, participants were asked to remember highlighted words from three test paragraphs. Accuracy scores were calculated for immediate recall after each test paragraph and for delayed recognition at the end of the paradigm. We hypothesized that highlighted words from paragraphs in the true tVNS condition would be more accurately recalled and/or recognized compared to highlighted words from paragraphs in the sham or control condition. RESULTS: In this randomized study, tVNS did not affect the accuracy scores for immediate recall or delayed recognition in both age groups. The younger group showed significantly higher accuracy scores than the older group. The accuracy scores improved over time, and the most recently learned words were better recognized. Participants rated true tVNS as significantly more painful; however, pain was not found to affect accuracy scores. CONCLUSION: In this study, tVNS did not affect verbal memory performance in healthy volunteers. Our results could not replicate the positive effects of invasive VNS on word recognition memory in epilepsy patients. Future research with the aim of improving cognitive function should focus on the rational identification of optimized and individualized stimulation settings primarily in patients with cognitive deficits. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7174665/ /pubmed/32351421 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00551 Text en Copyright © 2020 Mertens, Naert, Miatton, Poppa, Carrette, Gadeyne, Raedt, Boon and Vonck. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Mertens, Ann
Naert, Lien
Miatton, Marijke
Poppa, Tasha
Carrette, Evelien
Gadeyne, Stefanie
Raedt, Robrecht
Boon, Paul
Vonck, Kristl
Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation Does Not Affect Verbal Memory Performance in Healthy Volunteers
title Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation Does Not Affect Verbal Memory Performance in Healthy Volunteers
title_full Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation Does Not Affect Verbal Memory Performance in Healthy Volunteers
title_fullStr Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation Does Not Affect Verbal Memory Performance in Healthy Volunteers
title_full_unstemmed Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation Does Not Affect Verbal Memory Performance in Healthy Volunteers
title_short Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation Does Not Affect Verbal Memory Performance in Healthy Volunteers
title_sort transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation does not affect verbal memory performance in healthy volunteers
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7174665/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32351421
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00551
work_keys_str_mv AT mertensann transcutaneousvagusnervestimulationdoesnotaffectverbalmemoryperformanceinhealthyvolunteers
AT naertlien transcutaneousvagusnervestimulationdoesnotaffectverbalmemoryperformanceinhealthyvolunteers
AT miattonmarijke transcutaneousvagusnervestimulationdoesnotaffectverbalmemoryperformanceinhealthyvolunteers
AT poppatasha transcutaneousvagusnervestimulationdoesnotaffectverbalmemoryperformanceinhealthyvolunteers
AT carretteevelien transcutaneousvagusnervestimulationdoesnotaffectverbalmemoryperformanceinhealthyvolunteers
AT gadeynestefanie transcutaneousvagusnervestimulationdoesnotaffectverbalmemoryperformanceinhealthyvolunteers
AT raedtrobrecht transcutaneousvagusnervestimulationdoesnotaffectverbalmemoryperformanceinhealthyvolunteers
AT boonpaul transcutaneousvagusnervestimulationdoesnotaffectverbalmemoryperformanceinhealthyvolunteers
AT vonckkristl transcutaneousvagusnervestimulationdoesnotaffectverbalmemoryperformanceinhealthyvolunteers