Cargando…
Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation Does Not Affect Verbal Memory Performance in Healthy Volunteers
INTRODUCTION: Invasive vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) improves word recognition memory in patients with epilepsy. Recent studies with transcutaneous VNS (tVNS) have also shown positive effects on various subdomains of cognitive functioning in healthy volunteers. In this randomized, controlled, crosso...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7174665/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32351421 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00551 |
_version_ | 1783524672026968064 |
---|---|
author | Mertens, Ann Naert, Lien Miatton, Marijke Poppa, Tasha Carrette, Evelien Gadeyne, Stefanie Raedt, Robrecht Boon, Paul Vonck, Kristl |
author_facet | Mertens, Ann Naert, Lien Miatton, Marijke Poppa, Tasha Carrette, Evelien Gadeyne, Stefanie Raedt, Robrecht Boon, Paul Vonck, Kristl |
author_sort | Mertens, Ann |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Invasive vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) improves word recognition memory in patients with epilepsy. Recent studies with transcutaneous VNS (tVNS) have also shown positive effects on various subdomains of cognitive functioning in healthy volunteers. In this randomized, controlled, crossover study, we investigated the effect of tVNS on a word recognition memory paradigm in healthy volunteers to further investigate the potential of tVNS in the treatment of cognitive disorders. METHODS: We included 41 healthy participants aged between 18 and 30 years (young age group) and 24 healthy participants aged between 45 and 80 years (older age group). Each participant completed a word recognition memory paradigm during three different conditions: true tVNS, sham, and control. During true tVNS, stimulation was delivered at the cymba conchae. Sham stimulation was delivered by stimulating the earlobe. In the control condition, no stimulation was given. In each condition, participants were asked to remember highlighted words from three test paragraphs. Accuracy scores were calculated for immediate recall after each test paragraph and for delayed recognition at the end of the paradigm. We hypothesized that highlighted words from paragraphs in the true tVNS condition would be more accurately recalled and/or recognized compared to highlighted words from paragraphs in the sham or control condition. RESULTS: In this randomized study, tVNS did not affect the accuracy scores for immediate recall or delayed recognition in both age groups. The younger group showed significantly higher accuracy scores than the older group. The accuracy scores improved over time, and the most recently learned words were better recognized. Participants rated true tVNS as significantly more painful; however, pain was not found to affect accuracy scores. CONCLUSION: In this study, tVNS did not affect verbal memory performance in healthy volunteers. Our results could not replicate the positive effects of invasive VNS on word recognition memory in epilepsy patients. Future research with the aim of improving cognitive function should focus on the rational identification of optimized and individualized stimulation settings primarily in patients with cognitive deficits. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7174665 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71746652020-04-29 Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation Does Not Affect Verbal Memory Performance in Healthy Volunteers Mertens, Ann Naert, Lien Miatton, Marijke Poppa, Tasha Carrette, Evelien Gadeyne, Stefanie Raedt, Robrecht Boon, Paul Vonck, Kristl Front Psychol Psychology INTRODUCTION: Invasive vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) improves word recognition memory in patients with epilepsy. Recent studies with transcutaneous VNS (tVNS) have also shown positive effects on various subdomains of cognitive functioning in healthy volunteers. In this randomized, controlled, crossover study, we investigated the effect of tVNS on a word recognition memory paradigm in healthy volunteers to further investigate the potential of tVNS in the treatment of cognitive disorders. METHODS: We included 41 healthy participants aged between 18 and 30 years (young age group) and 24 healthy participants aged between 45 and 80 years (older age group). Each participant completed a word recognition memory paradigm during three different conditions: true tVNS, sham, and control. During true tVNS, stimulation was delivered at the cymba conchae. Sham stimulation was delivered by stimulating the earlobe. In the control condition, no stimulation was given. In each condition, participants were asked to remember highlighted words from three test paragraphs. Accuracy scores were calculated for immediate recall after each test paragraph and for delayed recognition at the end of the paradigm. We hypothesized that highlighted words from paragraphs in the true tVNS condition would be more accurately recalled and/or recognized compared to highlighted words from paragraphs in the sham or control condition. RESULTS: In this randomized study, tVNS did not affect the accuracy scores for immediate recall or delayed recognition in both age groups. The younger group showed significantly higher accuracy scores than the older group. The accuracy scores improved over time, and the most recently learned words were better recognized. Participants rated true tVNS as significantly more painful; however, pain was not found to affect accuracy scores. CONCLUSION: In this study, tVNS did not affect verbal memory performance in healthy volunteers. Our results could not replicate the positive effects of invasive VNS on word recognition memory in epilepsy patients. Future research with the aim of improving cognitive function should focus on the rational identification of optimized and individualized stimulation settings primarily in patients with cognitive deficits. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-04-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7174665/ /pubmed/32351421 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00551 Text en Copyright © 2020 Mertens, Naert, Miatton, Poppa, Carrette, Gadeyne, Raedt, Boon and Vonck. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Mertens, Ann Naert, Lien Miatton, Marijke Poppa, Tasha Carrette, Evelien Gadeyne, Stefanie Raedt, Robrecht Boon, Paul Vonck, Kristl Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation Does Not Affect Verbal Memory Performance in Healthy Volunteers |
title | Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation Does Not Affect Verbal Memory Performance in Healthy Volunteers |
title_full | Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation Does Not Affect Verbal Memory Performance in Healthy Volunteers |
title_fullStr | Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation Does Not Affect Verbal Memory Performance in Healthy Volunteers |
title_full_unstemmed | Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation Does Not Affect Verbal Memory Performance in Healthy Volunteers |
title_short | Transcutaneous Vagus Nerve Stimulation Does Not Affect Verbal Memory Performance in Healthy Volunteers |
title_sort | transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation does not affect verbal memory performance in healthy volunteers |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7174665/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32351421 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00551 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mertensann transcutaneousvagusnervestimulationdoesnotaffectverbalmemoryperformanceinhealthyvolunteers AT naertlien transcutaneousvagusnervestimulationdoesnotaffectverbalmemoryperformanceinhealthyvolunteers AT miattonmarijke transcutaneousvagusnervestimulationdoesnotaffectverbalmemoryperformanceinhealthyvolunteers AT poppatasha transcutaneousvagusnervestimulationdoesnotaffectverbalmemoryperformanceinhealthyvolunteers AT carretteevelien transcutaneousvagusnervestimulationdoesnotaffectverbalmemoryperformanceinhealthyvolunteers AT gadeynestefanie transcutaneousvagusnervestimulationdoesnotaffectverbalmemoryperformanceinhealthyvolunteers AT raedtrobrecht transcutaneousvagusnervestimulationdoesnotaffectverbalmemoryperformanceinhealthyvolunteers AT boonpaul transcutaneousvagusnervestimulationdoesnotaffectverbalmemoryperformanceinhealthyvolunteers AT vonckkristl transcutaneousvagusnervestimulationdoesnotaffectverbalmemoryperformanceinhealthyvolunteers |