Cargando…
Development and Validation of a Medication Selection Model Under Clinical Application of Renin-Angiotensin Inhibitor Combined with Calcium Channel Blocker for Hypertension Patients
BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the impact of clinical features and concomitant conditions on the clinical selection of different renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors in patients with hypertension, and built a renin-angiotensin inhibitors selection model (RAISM) to provide a reference for clin...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
International Scientific Literature, Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7174895/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32285846 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.923696 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the impact of clinical features and concomitant conditions on the clinical selection of different renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors in patients with hypertension, and built a renin-angiotensin inhibitors selection model (RAISM) to provide a reference for clinical decision making. MATERIAL/METHODS: We included 213 hypertensive patients in the study cohort; patients were divided into two groups: the angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) combined with calcium channel blocker (CCB) group (ACEI+CCB group) and the angiotensin receptor antagonist (ARB) combined with CCB group (ARB+CCB group). Basic demographic characteristics and concomitant conditions of the patients were compared. Single-factor and multi-factor analysis was performed by adopting logistic regression model. The RAISM was established by utilizing the nomograph technology. C-index and calibration curve were used to evaluate the model’s efficacy. RESULTS: In the study, 34.27% of the patients used ACEI+CCB and 65.73% of patients used ARB+CCB. The difference in age, body mass index (BMI), elderly patient, diabetes, renal dysfunction, and hyperlipidemia between the 2 groups determined medication selection. To be specific, compared to the group using ARB+CCB, the odds ratios and 95% confidence interval (CI) of the aforementioned factors for the ACEI+CCB group were 0.476 (0.319–0.711), 1.274 (1.001–1.622), 0.365 (0.180–0.743), 0.471 (0.203–1.092), 0.542 (0.268–1.094), and 0.270 (0.100–0.728), respectively; The C-index of RAISM acquired from the model construction parameters was 0.699, and the correction curve demonstrated that the model has good discriminative ability. CONCLUSIONS: The outcome of our study suggests that independent discriminating factors that influence the clinical selection of different RAS inhibitors were elderly patient, renal insufficiency, and hyperlipidemia; and the RAISM constructed in this study has good predictability and clinical benefit. |
---|