Cargando…

Machine Learning to Identify Flexibility Signatures of Class A GPCR Inhibition

We show that machine learning can pinpoint features distinguishing inactive from active states in proteins, in particular identifying key ligand binding site flexibility transitions in GPCRs that are triggered by biologically active ligands. Our analysis was performed on the helical segments and loo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bemister-Buffington, Joseph, Wolf, Alex J., Raschka, Sebastian, Kuhn, Leslie A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7175283/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32183371
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biom10030454
_version_ 1783524801927708672
author Bemister-Buffington, Joseph
Wolf, Alex J.
Raschka, Sebastian
Kuhn, Leslie A.
author_facet Bemister-Buffington, Joseph
Wolf, Alex J.
Raschka, Sebastian
Kuhn, Leslie A.
author_sort Bemister-Buffington, Joseph
collection PubMed
description We show that machine learning can pinpoint features distinguishing inactive from active states in proteins, in particular identifying key ligand binding site flexibility transitions in GPCRs that are triggered by biologically active ligands. Our analysis was performed on the helical segments and loops in 18 inactive and 9 active class A G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). These three-dimensional (3D) structures were determined in complex with ligands. However, considering the flexible versus rigid state identified by graph-theoretic ProFlex rigidity analysis for each helix and loop segment with the ligand removed, followed by feature selection and k-nearest neighbor classification, was sufficient to identify four segments surrounding the ligand binding site whose flexibility/rigidity accurately predicts whether a GPCR is in an active or inactive state. GPCRs bound to inhibitors were similar in their pattern of flexible versus rigid regions, whereas agonist-bound GPCRs were more flexible and diverse. This new ligand-proximal flexibility signature of GPCR activity was identified without knowledge of the ligand binding mode or previously defined switch regions, while being adjacent to the known transmission switch. Following this proof of concept, the ProFlex flexibility analysis coupled with pattern recognition and activity classification may be useful for predicting whether newly designed ligands behave as activators or inhibitors in protein families in general, based on the pattern of flexibility they induce in the protein.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7175283
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71752832020-04-28 Machine Learning to Identify Flexibility Signatures of Class A GPCR Inhibition Bemister-Buffington, Joseph Wolf, Alex J. Raschka, Sebastian Kuhn, Leslie A. Biomolecules Article We show that machine learning can pinpoint features distinguishing inactive from active states in proteins, in particular identifying key ligand binding site flexibility transitions in GPCRs that are triggered by biologically active ligands. Our analysis was performed on the helical segments and loops in 18 inactive and 9 active class A G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). These three-dimensional (3D) structures were determined in complex with ligands. However, considering the flexible versus rigid state identified by graph-theoretic ProFlex rigidity analysis for each helix and loop segment with the ligand removed, followed by feature selection and k-nearest neighbor classification, was sufficient to identify four segments surrounding the ligand binding site whose flexibility/rigidity accurately predicts whether a GPCR is in an active or inactive state. GPCRs bound to inhibitors were similar in their pattern of flexible versus rigid regions, whereas agonist-bound GPCRs were more flexible and diverse. This new ligand-proximal flexibility signature of GPCR activity was identified without knowledge of the ligand binding mode or previously defined switch regions, while being adjacent to the known transmission switch. Following this proof of concept, the ProFlex flexibility analysis coupled with pattern recognition and activity classification may be useful for predicting whether newly designed ligands behave as activators or inhibitors in protein families in general, based on the pattern of flexibility they induce in the protein. MDPI 2020-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7175283/ /pubmed/32183371 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biom10030454 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Bemister-Buffington, Joseph
Wolf, Alex J.
Raschka, Sebastian
Kuhn, Leslie A.
Machine Learning to Identify Flexibility Signatures of Class A GPCR Inhibition
title Machine Learning to Identify Flexibility Signatures of Class A GPCR Inhibition
title_full Machine Learning to Identify Flexibility Signatures of Class A GPCR Inhibition
title_fullStr Machine Learning to Identify Flexibility Signatures of Class A GPCR Inhibition
title_full_unstemmed Machine Learning to Identify Flexibility Signatures of Class A GPCR Inhibition
title_short Machine Learning to Identify Flexibility Signatures of Class A GPCR Inhibition
title_sort machine learning to identify flexibility signatures of class a gpcr inhibition
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7175283/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32183371
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biom10030454
work_keys_str_mv AT bemisterbuffingtonjoseph machinelearningtoidentifyflexibilitysignaturesofclassagpcrinhibition
AT wolfalexj machinelearningtoidentifyflexibilitysignaturesofclassagpcrinhibition
AT raschkasebastian machinelearningtoidentifyflexibilitysignaturesofclassagpcrinhibition
AT kuhnlesliea machinelearningtoidentifyflexibilitysignaturesofclassagpcrinhibition