Cargando…
Machine Learning to Identify Flexibility Signatures of Class A GPCR Inhibition
We show that machine learning can pinpoint features distinguishing inactive from active states in proteins, in particular identifying key ligand binding site flexibility transitions in GPCRs that are triggered by biologically active ligands. Our analysis was performed on the helical segments and loo...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7175283/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32183371 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biom10030454 |
_version_ | 1783524801927708672 |
---|---|
author | Bemister-Buffington, Joseph Wolf, Alex J. Raschka, Sebastian Kuhn, Leslie A. |
author_facet | Bemister-Buffington, Joseph Wolf, Alex J. Raschka, Sebastian Kuhn, Leslie A. |
author_sort | Bemister-Buffington, Joseph |
collection | PubMed |
description | We show that machine learning can pinpoint features distinguishing inactive from active states in proteins, in particular identifying key ligand binding site flexibility transitions in GPCRs that are triggered by biologically active ligands. Our analysis was performed on the helical segments and loops in 18 inactive and 9 active class A G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). These three-dimensional (3D) structures were determined in complex with ligands. However, considering the flexible versus rigid state identified by graph-theoretic ProFlex rigidity analysis for each helix and loop segment with the ligand removed, followed by feature selection and k-nearest neighbor classification, was sufficient to identify four segments surrounding the ligand binding site whose flexibility/rigidity accurately predicts whether a GPCR is in an active or inactive state. GPCRs bound to inhibitors were similar in their pattern of flexible versus rigid regions, whereas agonist-bound GPCRs were more flexible and diverse. This new ligand-proximal flexibility signature of GPCR activity was identified without knowledge of the ligand binding mode or previously defined switch regions, while being adjacent to the known transmission switch. Following this proof of concept, the ProFlex flexibility analysis coupled with pattern recognition and activity classification may be useful for predicting whether newly designed ligands behave as activators or inhibitors in protein families in general, based on the pattern of flexibility they induce in the protein. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7175283 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71752832020-04-28 Machine Learning to Identify Flexibility Signatures of Class A GPCR Inhibition Bemister-Buffington, Joseph Wolf, Alex J. Raschka, Sebastian Kuhn, Leslie A. Biomolecules Article We show that machine learning can pinpoint features distinguishing inactive from active states in proteins, in particular identifying key ligand binding site flexibility transitions in GPCRs that are triggered by biologically active ligands. Our analysis was performed on the helical segments and loops in 18 inactive and 9 active class A G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). These three-dimensional (3D) structures were determined in complex with ligands. However, considering the flexible versus rigid state identified by graph-theoretic ProFlex rigidity analysis for each helix and loop segment with the ligand removed, followed by feature selection and k-nearest neighbor classification, was sufficient to identify four segments surrounding the ligand binding site whose flexibility/rigidity accurately predicts whether a GPCR is in an active or inactive state. GPCRs bound to inhibitors were similar in their pattern of flexible versus rigid regions, whereas agonist-bound GPCRs were more flexible and diverse. This new ligand-proximal flexibility signature of GPCR activity was identified without knowledge of the ligand binding mode or previously defined switch regions, while being adjacent to the known transmission switch. Following this proof of concept, the ProFlex flexibility analysis coupled with pattern recognition and activity classification may be useful for predicting whether newly designed ligands behave as activators or inhibitors in protein families in general, based on the pattern of flexibility they induce in the protein. MDPI 2020-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7175283/ /pubmed/32183371 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biom10030454 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Bemister-Buffington, Joseph Wolf, Alex J. Raschka, Sebastian Kuhn, Leslie A. Machine Learning to Identify Flexibility Signatures of Class A GPCR Inhibition |
title | Machine Learning to Identify Flexibility Signatures of Class A GPCR Inhibition |
title_full | Machine Learning to Identify Flexibility Signatures of Class A GPCR Inhibition |
title_fullStr | Machine Learning to Identify Flexibility Signatures of Class A GPCR Inhibition |
title_full_unstemmed | Machine Learning to Identify Flexibility Signatures of Class A GPCR Inhibition |
title_short | Machine Learning to Identify Flexibility Signatures of Class A GPCR Inhibition |
title_sort | machine learning to identify flexibility signatures of class a gpcr inhibition |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7175283/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32183371 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biom10030454 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bemisterbuffingtonjoseph machinelearningtoidentifyflexibilitysignaturesofclassagpcrinhibition AT wolfalexj machinelearningtoidentifyflexibilitysignaturesofclassagpcrinhibition AT raschkasebastian machinelearningtoidentifyflexibilitysignaturesofclassagpcrinhibition AT kuhnlesliea machinelearningtoidentifyflexibilitysignaturesofclassagpcrinhibition |