Cargando…

Evaluation of Profile Changes in Class II Individuals Treated by Means of Herbst Miniscope Appliance

Background: To evaluate the profile changes following orthopedic/orthodontic treatment with the Herbst Miniscope(®) appliance in subjects affected with Class II malocclusion with mandibular retrusion. Methods: A total of 44 patients presenting a skeletal Angle Class II malocclusion (ANB > 4°) due...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martina, Stefano, Di Stefano, Maria Luisa, Paduano, Francesco Paolo, Aiello, Domenico, Valletta, Rosa, Paduano, Sergio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7175301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32244893
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj8010027
_version_ 1783524805912297472
author Martina, Stefano
Di Stefano, Maria Luisa
Paduano, Francesco Paolo
Aiello, Domenico
Valletta, Rosa
Paduano, Sergio
author_facet Martina, Stefano
Di Stefano, Maria Luisa
Paduano, Francesco Paolo
Aiello, Domenico
Valletta, Rosa
Paduano, Sergio
author_sort Martina, Stefano
collection PubMed
description Background: To evaluate the profile changes following orthopedic/orthodontic treatment with the Herbst Miniscope(®) appliance in subjects affected with Class II malocclusion with mandibular retrusion. Methods: A total of 44 patients presenting a skeletal Angle Class II malocclusion (ANB > 4°) due to mandibular retrusion and a cervical maturation stage between CS2 and CS3 were included in the study. Of these 44 patients, 22 (mean age 11.9 ± 1.3, HBT group) were treated using the Herbst appliance, while 22 (mean age 10.6 ± 1.3, CTR group) were followed for a 12-month observational period. A cephalometric tracing was performed at the beginning of treatment (T0) and after 12 months (T1). Results: In both groups there was a significant advancement of soft tissue pogonion (HBT = 3.5 ± 3.0 mm, p < 0.001; CTR = 2.2 ± 2.9 mm, p < 0.001), but the difference between the two groups was not significant (p = 0.172). On the contrary, both groups had a significant advancement of the mandibular sulcus (HBT = 3.7 ± 2.8 mm, p < 0.001; CTR = 1.2 ± 2.2 mm, p < 0.001) and a lower lip protrusion (HBT = 3.45 ± 2.51 mm, p < 0.001; CTR = 1.7 ± 2.7 mm, p = 0.008), but in both cases the HBT group showed a statistically significant greater increase in sulcus protrusion (p = 0.002) and lower lip protrusion (p = 0.029) than controls. There were no statistically significant effects on the upper jaw. Conclusions: The Herbst appliance advanced the lower jaw soft tissues.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7175301
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71753012020-04-28 Evaluation of Profile Changes in Class II Individuals Treated by Means of Herbst Miniscope Appliance Martina, Stefano Di Stefano, Maria Luisa Paduano, Francesco Paolo Aiello, Domenico Valletta, Rosa Paduano, Sergio Dent J (Basel) Article Background: To evaluate the profile changes following orthopedic/orthodontic treatment with the Herbst Miniscope(®) appliance in subjects affected with Class II malocclusion with mandibular retrusion. Methods: A total of 44 patients presenting a skeletal Angle Class II malocclusion (ANB > 4°) due to mandibular retrusion and a cervical maturation stage between CS2 and CS3 were included in the study. Of these 44 patients, 22 (mean age 11.9 ± 1.3, HBT group) were treated using the Herbst appliance, while 22 (mean age 10.6 ± 1.3, CTR group) were followed for a 12-month observational period. A cephalometric tracing was performed at the beginning of treatment (T0) and after 12 months (T1). Results: In both groups there was a significant advancement of soft tissue pogonion (HBT = 3.5 ± 3.0 mm, p < 0.001; CTR = 2.2 ± 2.9 mm, p < 0.001), but the difference between the two groups was not significant (p = 0.172). On the contrary, both groups had a significant advancement of the mandibular sulcus (HBT = 3.7 ± 2.8 mm, p < 0.001; CTR = 1.2 ± 2.2 mm, p < 0.001) and a lower lip protrusion (HBT = 3.45 ± 2.51 mm, p < 0.001; CTR = 1.7 ± 2.7 mm, p = 0.008), but in both cases the HBT group showed a statistically significant greater increase in sulcus protrusion (p = 0.002) and lower lip protrusion (p = 0.029) than controls. There were no statistically significant effects on the upper jaw. Conclusions: The Herbst appliance advanced the lower jaw soft tissues. MDPI 2020-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7175301/ /pubmed/32244893 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj8010027 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Martina, Stefano
Di Stefano, Maria Luisa
Paduano, Francesco Paolo
Aiello, Domenico
Valletta, Rosa
Paduano, Sergio
Evaluation of Profile Changes in Class II Individuals Treated by Means of Herbst Miniscope Appliance
title Evaluation of Profile Changes in Class II Individuals Treated by Means of Herbst Miniscope Appliance
title_full Evaluation of Profile Changes in Class II Individuals Treated by Means of Herbst Miniscope Appliance
title_fullStr Evaluation of Profile Changes in Class II Individuals Treated by Means of Herbst Miniscope Appliance
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Profile Changes in Class II Individuals Treated by Means of Herbst Miniscope Appliance
title_short Evaluation of Profile Changes in Class II Individuals Treated by Means of Herbst Miniscope Appliance
title_sort evaluation of profile changes in class ii individuals treated by means of herbst miniscope appliance
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7175301/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32244893
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj8010027
work_keys_str_mv AT martinastefano evaluationofprofilechangesinclassiiindividualstreatedbymeansofherbstminiscopeappliance
AT distefanomarialuisa evaluationofprofilechangesinclassiiindividualstreatedbymeansofherbstminiscopeappliance
AT paduanofrancescopaolo evaluationofprofilechangesinclassiiindividualstreatedbymeansofherbstminiscopeappliance
AT aiellodomenico evaluationofprofilechangesinclassiiindividualstreatedbymeansofherbstminiscopeappliance
AT vallettarosa evaluationofprofilechangesinclassiiindividualstreatedbymeansofherbstminiscopeappliance
AT paduanosergio evaluationofprofilechangesinclassiiindividualstreatedbymeansofherbstminiscopeappliance