Cargando…
Evaluation of Profile Changes in Class II Individuals Treated by Means of Herbst Miniscope Appliance
Background: To evaluate the profile changes following orthopedic/orthodontic treatment with the Herbst Miniscope(®) appliance in subjects affected with Class II malocclusion with mandibular retrusion. Methods: A total of 44 patients presenting a skeletal Angle Class II malocclusion (ANB > 4°) due...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7175301/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32244893 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj8010027 |
_version_ | 1783524805912297472 |
---|---|
author | Martina, Stefano Di Stefano, Maria Luisa Paduano, Francesco Paolo Aiello, Domenico Valletta, Rosa Paduano, Sergio |
author_facet | Martina, Stefano Di Stefano, Maria Luisa Paduano, Francesco Paolo Aiello, Domenico Valletta, Rosa Paduano, Sergio |
author_sort | Martina, Stefano |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: To evaluate the profile changes following orthopedic/orthodontic treatment with the Herbst Miniscope(®) appliance in subjects affected with Class II malocclusion with mandibular retrusion. Methods: A total of 44 patients presenting a skeletal Angle Class II malocclusion (ANB > 4°) due to mandibular retrusion and a cervical maturation stage between CS2 and CS3 were included in the study. Of these 44 patients, 22 (mean age 11.9 ± 1.3, HBT group) were treated using the Herbst appliance, while 22 (mean age 10.6 ± 1.3, CTR group) were followed for a 12-month observational period. A cephalometric tracing was performed at the beginning of treatment (T0) and after 12 months (T1). Results: In both groups there was a significant advancement of soft tissue pogonion (HBT = 3.5 ± 3.0 mm, p < 0.001; CTR = 2.2 ± 2.9 mm, p < 0.001), but the difference between the two groups was not significant (p = 0.172). On the contrary, both groups had a significant advancement of the mandibular sulcus (HBT = 3.7 ± 2.8 mm, p < 0.001; CTR = 1.2 ± 2.2 mm, p < 0.001) and a lower lip protrusion (HBT = 3.45 ± 2.51 mm, p < 0.001; CTR = 1.7 ± 2.7 mm, p = 0.008), but in both cases the HBT group showed a statistically significant greater increase in sulcus protrusion (p = 0.002) and lower lip protrusion (p = 0.029) than controls. There were no statistically significant effects on the upper jaw. Conclusions: The Herbst appliance advanced the lower jaw soft tissues. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7175301 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71753012020-04-28 Evaluation of Profile Changes in Class II Individuals Treated by Means of Herbst Miniscope Appliance Martina, Stefano Di Stefano, Maria Luisa Paduano, Francesco Paolo Aiello, Domenico Valletta, Rosa Paduano, Sergio Dent J (Basel) Article Background: To evaluate the profile changes following orthopedic/orthodontic treatment with the Herbst Miniscope(®) appliance in subjects affected with Class II malocclusion with mandibular retrusion. Methods: A total of 44 patients presenting a skeletal Angle Class II malocclusion (ANB > 4°) due to mandibular retrusion and a cervical maturation stage between CS2 and CS3 were included in the study. Of these 44 patients, 22 (mean age 11.9 ± 1.3, HBT group) were treated using the Herbst appliance, while 22 (mean age 10.6 ± 1.3, CTR group) were followed for a 12-month observational period. A cephalometric tracing was performed at the beginning of treatment (T0) and after 12 months (T1). Results: In both groups there was a significant advancement of soft tissue pogonion (HBT = 3.5 ± 3.0 mm, p < 0.001; CTR = 2.2 ± 2.9 mm, p < 0.001), but the difference between the two groups was not significant (p = 0.172). On the contrary, both groups had a significant advancement of the mandibular sulcus (HBT = 3.7 ± 2.8 mm, p < 0.001; CTR = 1.2 ± 2.2 mm, p < 0.001) and a lower lip protrusion (HBT = 3.45 ± 2.51 mm, p < 0.001; CTR = 1.7 ± 2.7 mm, p = 0.008), but in both cases the HBT group showed a statistically significant greater increase in sulcus protrusion (p = 0.002) and lower lip protrusion (p = 0.029) than controls. There were no statistically significant effects on the upper jaw. Conclusions: The Herbst appliance advanced the lower jaw soft tissues. MDPI 2020-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC7175301/ /pubmed/32244893 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj8010027 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Martina, Stefano Di Stefano, Maria Luisa Paduano, Francesco Paolo Aiello, Domenico Valletta, Rosa Paduano, Sergio Evaluation of Profile Changes in Class II Individuals Treated by Means of Herbst Miniscope Appliance |
title | Evaluation of Profile Changes in Class II Individuals Treated by Means of Herbst Miniscope Appliance |
title_full | Evaluation of Profile Changes in Class II Individuals Treated by Means of Herbst Miniscope Appliance |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Profile Changes in Class II Individuals Treated by Means of Herbst Miniscope Appliance |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Profile Changes in Class II Individuals Treated by Means of Herbst Miniscope Appliance |
title_short | Evaluation of Profile Changes in Class II Individuals Treated by Means of Herbst Miniscope Appliance |
title_sort | evaluation of profile changes in class ii individuals treated by means of herbst miniscope appliance |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7175301/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32244893 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/dj8010027 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT martinastefano evaluationofprofilechangesinclassiiindividualstreatedbymeansofherbstminiscopeappliance AT distefanomarialuisa evaluationofprofilechangesinclassiiindividualstreatedbymeansofherbstminiscopeappliance AT paduanofrancescopaolo evaluationofprofilechangesinclassiiindividualstreatedbymeansofherbstminiscopeappliance AT aiellodomenico evaluationofprofilechangesinclassiiindividualstreatedbymeansofherbstminiscopeappliance AT vallettarosa evaluationofprofilechangesinclassiiindividualstreatedbymeansofherbstminiscopeappliance AT paduanosergio evaluationofprofilechangesinclassiiindividualstreatedbymeansofherbstminiscopeappliance |