Cargando…

Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference of SGRQ-I and K-BILD in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) specific version of St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ-I) and King’s Brief Interstitial Lung Disease questionnaire (K-BILD) are validated health-related quality of life (HRQL) instruments, but no or limited data exist on their responsiveness...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Prior, Thomas Skovhus, Hoyer, Nils, Hilberg, Ole, Shaker, Saher Burhan, Davidsen, Jesper Rømhild, Bendstrup, Elisabeth
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7175493/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32316976
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-020-01359-3
_version_ 1783524842201415680
author Prior, Thomas Skovhus
Hoyer, Nils
Hilberg, Ole
Shaker, Saher Burhan
Davidsen, Jesper Rømhild
Bendstrup, Elisabeth
author_facet Prior, Thomas Skovhus
Hoyer, Nils
Hilberg, Ole
Shaker, Saher Burhan
Davidsen, Jesper Rømhild
Bendstrup, Elisabeth
author_sort Prior, Thomas Skovhus
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) specific version of St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ-I) and King’s Brief Interstitial Lung Disease questionnaire (K-BILD) are validated health-related quality of life (HRQL) instruments, but no or limited data exist on their responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference (MCID). The objectives of this study were to assess responsiveness of SGRQ-I and K-BILD and determine MCID separately for deterioration and improvement in a large, prospective cohort of patients with IPF in a real-world setting. METHODS: Consecutive patients with IPF were recruited. SGRQ-I, K-BILD, SGRQ, Shortness of Breath Questionnaire, pulmonary function tests and 6-min walk test measurements were obtained at baseline and at six and 12 months; at six and 12 months, patients also completed Global Rating of Change Scales. Responsiveness was assessed using correlation coefficients and linear regression. Cox regression was used for mortality analyses. MCID was estimated using receiver operating characteristic curves with separate analyses for improvement and deterioration. RESULTS: A total of 150 IPF patients were included and 124 completed the 12-month follow-up. Based on all HRQL anchors and most physiological anchors, responsiveness analyses supported the evidence pointing towards SGRQ-I and K-BILD as responsive instruments. Multivariate analyses showed an association between SGRQ-I and mortality (HR: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.02 to 1.36, p = 0.03) and a trend was found for K-BILD (HR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.64 to 1.05, p = 0.12). MCID was estimated for all domains of SGRQ-I and K-BILD. MCID for improvement differed from deterioration for both SGRQ-I Total (3.9 and 4.9) and K-BILD Total (4.7 and 2.7). CONCLUSIONS: SGRQ-I and K-BILD were responsive to change concerning both HRQL and most physiological anchors. MCID was determined separately for improvement and deterioration, resulting in different estimates; especially a smaller estimate for deterioration compared to improvement in K-BILD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, no. NCT02818712. Registered 30 June 2016.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7175493
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71754932020-04-24 Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference of SGRQ-I and K-BILD in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis Prior, Thomas Skovhus Hoyer, Nils Hilberg, Ole Shaker, Saher Burhan Davidsen, Jesper Rømhild Bendstrup, Elisabeth Respir Res Research BACKGROUND: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) specific version of St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ-I) and King’s Brief Interstitial Lung Disease questionnaire (K-BILD) are validated health-related quality of life (HRQL) instruments, but no or limited data exist on their responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference (MCID). The objectives of this study were to assess responsiveness of SGRQ-I and K-BILD and determine MCID separately for deterioration and improvement in a large, prospective cohort of patients with IPF in a real-world setting. METHODS: Consecutive patients with IPF were recruited. SGRQ-I, K-BILD, SGRQ, Shortness of Breath Questionnaire, pulmonary function tests and 6-min walk test measurements were obtained at baseline and at six and 12 months; at six and 12 months, patients also completed Global Rating of Change Scales. Responsiveness was assessed using correlation coefficients and linear regression. Cox regression was used for mortality analyses. MCID was estimated using receiver operating characteristic curves with separate analyses for improvement and deterioration. RESULTS: A total of 150 IPF patients were included and 124 completed the 12-month follow-up. Based on all HRQL anchors and most physiological anchors, responsiveness analyses supported the evidence pointing towards SGRQ-I and K-BILD as responsive instruments. Multivariate analyses showed an association between SGRQ-I and mortality (HR: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.02 to 1.36, p = 0.03) and a trend was found for K-BILD (HR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.64 to 1.05, p = 0.12). MCID was estimated for all domains of SGRQ-I and K-BILD. MCID for improvement differed from deterioration for both SGRQ-I Total (3.9 and 4.9) and K-BILD Total (4.7 and 2.7). CONCLUSIONS: SGRQ-I and K-BILD were responsive to change concerning both HRQL and most physiological anchors. MCID was determined separately for improvement and deterioration, resulting in different estimates; especially a smaller estimate for deterioration compared to improvement in K-BILD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, no. NCT02818712. Registered 30 June 2016. BioMed Central 2020-04-21 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7175493/ /pubmed/32316976 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-020-01359-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Prior, Thomas Skovhus
Hoyer, Nils
Hilberg, Ole
Shaker, Saher Burhan
Davidsen, Jesper Rømhild
Bendstrup, Elisabeth
Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference of SGRQ-I and K-BILD in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
title Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference of SGRQ-I and K-BILD in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
title_full Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference of SGRQ-I and K-BILD in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
title_fullStr Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference of SGRQ-I and K-BILD in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
title_full_unstemmed Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference of SGRQ-I and K-BILD in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
title_short Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference of SGRQ-I and K-BILD in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
title_sort responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference of sgrq-i and k-bild in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7175493/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32316976
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12931-020-01359-3
work_keys_str_mv AT priorthomasskovhus responsivenessandminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceofsgrqiandkbildinidiopathicpulmonaryfibrosis
AT hoyernils responsivenessandminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceofsgrqiandkbildinidiopathicpulmonaryfibrosis
AT hilbergole responsivenessandminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceofsgrqiandkbildinidiopathicpulmonaryfibrosis
AT shakersaherburhan responsivenessandminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceofsgrqiandkbildinidiopathicpulmonaryfibrosis
AT davidsenjesperrømhild responsivenessandminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceofsgrqiandkbildinidiopathicpulmonaryfibrosis
AT bendstrupelisabeth responsivenessandminimalclinicallyimportantdifferenceofsgrqiandkbildinidiopathicpulmonaryfibrosis