Cargando…

Development and feasibility of an intervention featuring individual supported work placements to aid return to work for unemployed people living with chronic pain

BACKGROUND: Working in good jobs is associated with good health. High unemployment rates are reported in those disabled with musculoskeletal pain. Supported employment interventions work well for helping people with mental health difficulties to gain and retain employment. With adaptation, these may...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Froud, Robert, Grant, Mary, Burton, Kim, Foss, Jonathan, Ellard, David R., Seers, Kate, Smith, Deb, Barillec, Mariana, Patel, Shilpa, Haywood, Kirstie, Underwood, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7175501/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32337065
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-020-00581-6
_version_ 1783524844093046784
author Froud, Robert
Grant, Mary
Burton, Kim
Foss, Jonathan
Ellard, David R.
Seers, Kate
Smith, Deb
Barillec, Mariana
Patel, Shilpa
Haywood, Kirstie
Underwood, Martin
author_facet Froud, Robert
Grant, Mary
Burton, Kim
Foss, Jonathan
Ellard, David R.
Seers, Kate
Smith, Deb
Barillec, Mariana
Patel, Shilpa
Haywood, Kirstie
Underwood, Martin
author_sort Froud, Robert
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Working in good jobs is associated with good health. High unemployment rates are reported in those disabled with musculoskeletal pain. Supported employment interventions work well for helping people with mental health difficulties to gain and retain employment. With adaptation, these may be useful for people with chronic pain. We aimed to develop and explore the feasibility of delivering such an adapted intervention. METHODS: We developed an intervention and recruited unemployed people with chronic pain from NHS pain clinics and employment services. We trained case managers to assess participants and match them to six-week work placements in the Midlands and provide ongoing support to them and their managers. Participants attended a two-day work preparation session prior to placement. Outcome measures included quality of life at baseline, six- weeks, 14-weeks, and six-months, and return to work at 14-weeks and six-months. We held focus groups or interviews with stakeholders to examine acceptability and experiences of the intervention. RESULTS: We developed an intervention consisting of work preparation sessions, work experience placements, and individualised employment support. We enrolled 31 people; 27 attended work preparation sessions, and 15 attended placements. Four of our participants started jobs during the study period. We are aware of two others starting jobs shortly after cessation of follow-up. We experienced challenges to recruitment in one area where we had many and diverse placement opportunities and good recruitment in another area where we had a smaller range of placement opportunities. All stakeholders found the intervention acceptable, and it was valued by those given a placement. While there was some disappointment among those not placed, this group still valued the work preparation sessions. CONCLUSIONS: The developed intervention was acceptable to participants and partners. Trialling the developed intervention could be feasible with attention to three main processes. To ensure advanced availability of a sufficiently wide range of work placements in each area, multiple partners would be needed. Multiple recruitment sites and focus on employment services will yield better recruitment rates than reliance on NHS pain clinics. Maintaining an adequate follow-up response rate will likely require additional approaches with more than the usual effort.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7175501
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71755012020-04-24 Development and feasibility of an intervention featuring individual supported work placements to aid return to work for unemployed people living with chronic pain Froud, Robert Grant, Mary Burton, Kim Foss, Jonathan Ellard, David R. Seers, Kate Smith, Deb Barillec, Mariana Patel, Shilpa Haywood, Kirstie Underwood, Martin Pilot Feasibility Stud Research BACKGROUND: Working in good jobs is associated with good health. High unemployment rates are reported in those disabled with musculoskeletal pain. Supported employment interventions work well for helping people with mental health difficulties to gain and retain employment. With adaptation, these may be useful for people with chronic pain. We aimed to develop and explore the feasibility of delivering such an adapted intervention. METHODS: We developed an intervention and recruited unemployed people with chronic pain from NHS pain clinics and employment services. We trained case managers to assess participants and match them to six-week work placements in the Midlands and provide ongoing support to them and their managers. Participants attended a two-day work preparation session prior to placement. Outcome measures included quality of life at baseline, six- weeks, 14-weeks, and six-months, and return to work at 14-weeks and six-months. We held focus groups or interviews with stakeholders to examine acceptability and experiences of the intervention. RESULTS: We developed an intervention consisting of work preparation sessions, work experience placements, and individualised employment support. We enrolled 31 people; 27 attended work preparation sessions, and 15 attended placements. Four of our participants started jobs during the study period. We are aware of two others starting jobs shortly after cessation of follow-up. We experienced challenges to recruitment in one area where we had many and diverse placement opportunities and good recruitment in another area where we had a smaller range of placement opportunities. All stakeholders found the intervention acceptable, and it was valued by those given a placement. While there was some disappointment among those not placed, this group still valued the work preparation sessions. CONCLUSIONS: The developed intervention was acceptable to participants and partners. Trialling the developed intervention could be feasible with attention to three main processes. To ensure advanced availability of a sufficiently wide range of work placements in each area, multiple partners would be needed. Multiple recruitment sites and focus on employment services will yield better recruitment rates than reliance on NHS pain clinics. Maintaining an adequate follow-up response rate will likely require additional approaches with more than the usual effort. BioMed Central 2020-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7175501/ /pubmed/32337065 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-020-00581-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Froud, Robert
Grant, Mary
Burton, Kim
Foss, Jonathan
Ellard, David R.
Seers, Kate
Smith, Deb
Barillec, Mariana
Patel, Shilpa
Haywood, Kirstie
Underwood, Martin
Development and feasibility of an intervention featuring individual supported work placements to aid return to work for unemployed people living with chronic pain
title Development and feasibility of an intervention featuring individual supported work placements to aid return to work for unemployed people living with chronic pain
title_full Development and feasibility of an intervention featuring individual supported work placements to aid return to work for unemployed people living with chronic pain
title_fullStr Development and feasibility of an intervention featuring individual supported work placements to aid return to work for unemployed people living with chronic pain
title_full_unstemmed Development and feasibility of an intervention featuring individual supported work placements to aid return to work for unemployed people living with chronic pain
title_short Development and feasibility of an intervention featuring individual supported work placements to aid return to work for unemployed people living with chronic pain
title_sort development and feasibility of an intervention featuring individual supported work placements to aid return to work for unemployed people living with chronic pain
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7175501/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32337065
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40814-020-00581-6
work_keys_str_mv AT froudrobert developmentandfeasibilityofaninterventionfeaturingindividualsupportedworkplacementstoaidreturntoworkforunemployedpeoplelivingwithchronicpain
AT grantmary developmentandfeasibilityofaninterventionfeaturingindividualsupportedworkplacementstoaidreturntoworkforunemployedpeoplelivingwithchronicpain
AT burtonkim developmentandfeasibilityofaninterventionfeaturingindividualsupportedworkplacementstoaidreturntoworkforunemployedpeoplelivingwithchronicpain
AT fossjonathan developmentandfeasibilityofaninterventionfeaturingindividualsupportedworkplacementstoaidreturntoworkforunemployedpeoplelivingwithchronicpain
AT ellarddavidr developmentandfeasibilityofaninterventionfeaturingindividualsupportedworkplacementstoaidreturntoworkforunemployedpeoplelivingwithchronicpain
AT seerskate developmentandfeasibilityofaninterventionfeaturingindividualsupportedworkplacementstoaidreturntoworkforunemployedpeoplelivingwithchronicpain
AT smithdeb developmentandfeasibilityofaninterventionfeaturingindividualsupportedworkplacementstoaidreturntoworkforunemployedpeoplelivingwithchronicpain
AT barillecmariana developmentandfeasibilityofaninterventionfeaturingindividualsupportedworkplacementstoaidreturntoworkforunemployedpeoplelivingwithchronicpain
AT patelshilpa developmentandfeasibilityofaninterventionfeaturingindividualsupportedworkplacementstoaidreturntoworkforunemployedpeoplelivingwithchronicpain
AT haywoodkirstie developmentandfeasibilityofaninterventionfeaturingindividualsupportedworkplacementstoaidreturntoworkforunemployedpeoplelivingwithchronicpain
AT underwoodmartin developmentandfeasibilityofaninterventionfeaturingindividualsupportedworkplacementstoaidreturntoworkforunemployedpeoplelivingwithchronicpain