Cargando…

Key components of mechanical work predict outcomes in robotic stroke therapy

BACKGROUND: Clinical practice typically emphasizes active involvement during therapy. However, traditional approaches can offer only general guidance on the form of involvement that would be most helpful to recovery. Beyond assisting movement, robots allow comprehensive methods for measuring practic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wright, Zachary A., Majeed, Yazan A., Patton, James L., Huang, Felix C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7175566/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32316977
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-020-00672-8
_version_ 1783524859001700352
author Wright, Zachary A.
Majeed, Yazan A.
Patton, James L.
Huang, Felix C.
author_facet Wright, Zachary A.
Majeed, Yazan A.
Patton, James L.
Huang, Felix C.
author_sort Wright, Zachary A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Clinical practice typically emphasizes active involvement during therapy. However, traditional approaches can offer only general guidance on the form of involvement that would be most helpful to recovery. Beyond assisting movement, robots allow comprehensive methods for measuring practice behaviors, including the energetic input of the learner. Using data from our previous study of robot-assisted therapy, we examined how separate components of mechanical work contribute to predicting training outcomes. METHODS: Stroke survivors (n = 11) completed six sessions in two-weeks of upper extremity motor exploration (self-directed movement practice) training with customized forces, while a control group (n = 11) trained without assistance. We employed multiple regression analysis to predict patient outcomes with computed mechanical work as independent variables, including separate features for elbow versus shoulder joints, positive (concentric) and negative (eccentric), flexion and extension. RESULTS: Our analysis showed that increases in total mechanical work during therapy were positively correlated with our final outcome metric, velocity range. Further analysis revealed that greater amounts of negative work at the shoulder and positive work at the elbow as the most important predictors of recovery (using cross-validated regression, R(2) = 52%). However, the work features were likely mutually correlated, suggesting a prediction model that first removed shared variance (using PCA, R(2) = 65–85%). CONCLUSIONS: These results support robotic training for stroke survivors that increases energetic activity in eccentric shoulder and concentric elbow actions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier: NCT02570256. Registered 7 October 2015 – Retrospectively registered,
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7175566
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71755662020-04-24 Key components of mechanical work predict outcomes in robotic stroke therapy Wright, Zachary A. Majeed, Yazan A. Patton, James L. Huang, Felix C. J Neuroeng Rehabil Research BACKGROUND: Clinical practice typically emphasizes active involvement during therapy. However, traditional approaches can offer only general guidance on the form of involvement that would be most helpful to recovery. Beyond assisting movement, robots allow comprehensive methods for measuring practice behaviors, including the energetic input of the learner. Using data from our previous study of robot-assisted therapy, we examined how separate components of mechanical work contribute to predicting training outcomes. METHODS: Stroke survivors (n = 11) completed six sessions in two-weeks of upper extremity motor exploration (self-directed movement practice) training with customized forces, while a control group (n = 11) trained without assistance. We employed multiple regression analysis to predict patient outcomes with computed mechanical work as independent variables, including separate features for elbow versus shoulder joints, positive (concentric) and negative (eccentric), flexion and extension. RESULTS: Our analysis showed that increases in total mechanical work during therapy were positively correlated with our final outcome metric, velocity range. Further analysis revealed that greater amounts of negative work at the shoulder and positive work at the elbow as the most important predictors of recovery (using cross-validated regression, R(2) = 52%). However, the work features were likely mutually correlated, suggesting a prediction model that first removed shared variance (using PCA, R(2) = 65–85%). CONCLUSIONS: These results support robotic training for stroke survivors that increases energetic activity in eccentric shoulder and concentric elbow actions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier: NCT02570256. Registered 7 October 2015 – Retrospectively registered, BioMed Central 2020-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7175566/ /pubmed/32316977 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-020-00672-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Wright, Zachary A.
Majeed, Yazan A.
Patton, James L.
Huang, Felix C.
Key components of mechanical work predict outcomes in robotic stroke therapy
title Key components of mechanical work predict outcomes in robotic stroke therapy
title_full Key components of mechanical work predict outcomes in robotic stroke therapy
title_fullStr Key components of mechanical work predict outcomes in robotic stroke therapy
title_full_unstemmed Key components of mechanical work predict outcomes in robotic stroke therapy
title_short Key components of mechanical work predict outcomes in robotic stroke therapy
title_sort key components of mechanical work predict outcomes in robotic stroke therapy
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7175566/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32316977
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12984-020-00672-8
work_keys_str_mv AT wrightzacharya keycomponentsofmechanicalworkpredictoutcomesinroboticstroketherapy
AT majeedyazana keycomponentsofmechanicalworkpredictoutcomesinroboticstroketherapy
AT pattonjamesl keycomponentsofmechanicalworkpredictoutcomesinroboticstroketherapy
AT huangfelixc keycomponentsofmechanicalworkpredictoutcomesinroboticstroketherapy