Cargando…

Are genetic databases sufficiently populated to detect non-indigenous species?

Correct species identifications are of tremendous importance for invasion ecology, as mistakes could lead to misdirecting limited resources against harmless species or inaction against problematic ones. DNA barcoding is becoming a promising and reliable tool for species identifications, however the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Briski, Elizabeta, Ghabooli, Sara, Bailey, Sarah A., MacIsaac, Hugh J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7175672/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32355454
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10530-016-1134-1
_version_ 1783524877833076736
author Briski, Elizabeta
Ghabooli, Sara
Bailey, Sarah A.
MacIsaac, Hugh J.
author_facet Briski, Elizabeta
Ghabooli, Sara
Bailey, Sarah A.
MacIsaac, Hugh J.
author_sort Briski, Elizabeta
collection PubMed
description Correct species identifications are of tremendous importance for invasion ecology, as mistakes could lead to misdirecting limited resources against harmless species or inaction against problematic ones. DNA barcoding is becoming a promising and reliable tool for species identifications, however the efficacy of such molecular taxonomy depends on gene region(s) that provide a unique sequence to differentiate among species and on availability of reference sequences in existing genetic databases. Here, we assembled a list of aquatic and terrestrial non-indigenous species (NIS) and checked two leading genetic databases for corresponding sequences of six genome regions used for DNA barcoding. The genetic databases were checked in 2010, 2012, and 2016. All four aquatic kingdoms (Animalia, Chromista, Plantae and Protozoa) were initially equally represented in the genetic databases, with 64, 65, 69, and 61 % of NIS included, respectively. Sequences for terrestrial NIS were present at rates of 58 and 78 % for Animalia and Plantae, respectively. Six years later, the number of sequences for aquatic NIS increased to 75, 75, 74, and 63 % respectively, while those for terrestrial NIS increased to 74 and 88 % respectively. Genetic databases are marginally better populated with sequences of terrestrial NIS of plants compared to aquatic NIS and terrestrial NIS of animals. The rate at which sequences are added to databases is not equal among taxa. Though some groups of NIS are not detectable at all based on available data—mostly aquatic ones—encouragingly, current availability of sequences of taxa with environmental and/or economic impact is relatively good and continues to increase with time. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10530-016-1134-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7175672
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71756722020-04-28 Are genetic databases sufficiently populated to detect non-indigenous species? Briski, Elizabeta Ghabooli, Sara Bailey, Sarah A. MacIsaac, Hugh J. Biol Invasions Original Paper Correct species identifications are of tremendous importance for invasion ecology, as mistakes could lead to misdirecting limited resources against harmless species or inaction against problematic ones. DNA barcoding is becoming a promising and reliable tool for species identifications, however the efficacy of such molecular taxonomy depends on gene region(s) that provide a unique sequence to differentiate among species and on availability of reference sequences in existing genetic databases. Here, we assembled a list of aquatic and terrestrial non-indigenous species (NIS) and checked two leading genetic databases for corresponding sequences of six genome regions used for DNA barcoding. The genetic databases were checked in 2010, 2012, and 2016. All four aquatic kingdoms (Animalia, Chromista, Plantae and Protozoa) were initially equally represented in the genetic databases, with 64, 65, 69, and 61 % of NIS included, respectively. Sequences for terrestrial NIS were present at rates of 58 and 78 % for Animalia and Plantae, respectively. Six years later, the number of sequences for aquatic NIS increased to 75, 75, 74, and 63 % respectively, while those for terrestrial NIS increased to 74 and 88 % respectively. Genetic databases are marginally better populated with sequences of terrestrial NIS of plants compared to aquatic NIS and terrestrial NIS of animals. The rate at which sequences are added to databases is not equal among taxa. Though some groups of NIS are not detectable at all based on available data—mostly aquatic ones—encouragingly, current availability of sequences of taxa with environmental and/or economic impact is relatively good and continues to increase with time. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10530-016-1134-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2016-04-05 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC7175672/ /pubmed/32355454 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10530-016-1134-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Briski, Elizabeta
Ghabooli, Sara
Bailey, Sarah A.
MacIsaac, Hugh J.
Are genetic databases sufficiently populated to detect non-indigenous species?
title Are genetic databases sufficiently populated to detect non-indigenous species?
title_full Are genetic databases sufficiently populated to detect non-indigenous species?
title_fullStr Are genetic databases sufficiently populated to detect non-indigenous species?
title_full_unstemmed Are genetic databases sufficiently populated to detect non-indigenous species?
title_short Are genetic databases sufficiently populated to detect non-indigenous species?
title_sort are genetic databases sufficiently populated to detect non-indigenous species?
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7175672/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32355454
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10530-016-1134-1
work_keys_str_mv AT briskielizabeta aregeneticdatabasessufficientlypopulatedtodetectnonindigenousspecies
AT ghaboolisara aregeneticdatabasessufficientlypopulatedtodetectnonindigenousspecies
AT baileysaraha aregeneticdatabasessufficientlypopulatedtodetectnonindigenousspecies
AT macisaachughj aregeneticdatabasessufficientlypopulatedtodetectnonindigenousspecies