Cargando…

Surface modified cellulose scaffolds for tissue engineering

We report the ability of cellulose to support cells without the use of matrix ligands on the surface of the material, thus creating a two-component system for tissue engineering of cells and materials. Sheets of bacterial cellulose, grown from a culture medium containing Acetobacter organism were ch...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Courtenay, James C., Johns, Marcus A., Galembeck, Fernando, Deneke, Christoph, Lanzoni, Evandro M., Costa, Carlos A., Scott, Janet L., Sharma, Ram I.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Netherlands 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7175690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32355428
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10570-016-1111-y
_version_ 1783524882023186432
author Courtenay, James C.
Johns, Marcus A.
Galembeck, Fernando
Deneke, Christoph
Lanzoni, Evandro M.
Costa, Carlos A.
Scott, Janet L.
Sharma, Ram I.
author_facet Courtenay, James C.
Johns, Marcus A.
Galembeck, Fernando
Deneke, Christoph
Lanzoni, Evandro M.
Costa, Carlos A.
Scott, Janet L.
Sharma, Ram I.
author_sort Courtenay, James C.
collection PubMed
description We report the ability of cellulose to support cells without the use of matrix ligands on the surface of the material, thus creating a two-component system for tissue engineering of cells and materials. Sheets of bacterial cellulose, grown from a culture medium containing Acetobacter organism were chemically modified with glycidyltrimethylammonium chloride or by oxidation with sodium hypochlorite in the presence of sodium bromide and 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpipiridine 1-oxyl radical to introduce a positive, or negative, charge, respectively. This modification process did not degrade the mechanical properties of the bulk material, but grafting of a positively charged moiety to the cellulose surface (cationic cellulose) increased cell attachment by 70% compared to unmodified cellulose, while negatively charged, oxidised cellulose films (anionic cellulose), showed low levels of cell attachment comparable to those seen for unmodified cellulose. Only a minimal level of cationic surface derivitisation (ca 3% degree of substitution) was required for increased cell attachment and no mediating proteins were required. Cell adhesion studies exhibited the same trends as the attachment studies, while the mean cell area and aspect ratio was highest on the cationic surfaces. Overall, we demonstrated the utility of positively charged bacterial cellulose in tissue engineering in the absence of proteins for cell attachment. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10570-016-1111-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7175690
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Springer Netherlands
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71756902020-04-28 Surface modified cellulose scaffolds for tissue engineering Courtenay, James C. Johns, Marcus A. Galembeck, Fernando Deneke, Christoph Lanzoni, Evandro M. Costa, Carlos A. Scott, Janet L. Sharma, Ram I. Cellulose (Lond) Original Paper We report the ability of cellulose to support cells without the use of matrix ligands on the surface of the material, thus creating a two-component system for tissue engineering of cells and materials. Sheets of bacterial cellulose, grown from a culture medium containing Acetobacter organism were chemically modified with glycidyltrimethylammonium chloride or by oxidation with sodium hypochlorite in the presence of sodium bromide and 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpipiridine 1-oxyl radical to introduce a positive, or negative, charge, respectively. This modification process did not degrade the mechanical properties of the bulk material, but grafting of a positively charged moiety to the cellulose surface (cationic cellulose) increased cell attachment by 70% compared to unmodified cellulose, while negatively charged, oxidised cellulose films (anionic cellulose), showed low levels of cell attachment comparable to those seen for unmodified cellulose. Only a minimal level of cationic surface derivitisation (ca 3% degree of substitution) was required for increased cell attachment and no mediating proteins were required. Cell adhesion studies exhibited the same trends as the attachment studies, while the mean cell area and aspect ratio was highest on the cationic surfaces. Overall, we demonstrated the utility of positively charged bacterial cellulose in tissue engineering in the absence of proteins for cell attachment. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s10570-016-1111-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Netherlands 2016-11-09 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC7175690/ /pubmed/32355428 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10570-016-1111-y Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Courtenay, James C.
Johns, Marcus A.
Galembeck, Fernando
Deneke, Christoph
Lanzoni, Evandro M.
Costa, Carlos A.
Scott, Janet L.
Sharma, Ram I.
Surface modified cellulose scaffolds for tissue engineering
title Surface modified cellulose scaffolds for tissue engineering
title_full Surface modified cellulose scaffolds for tissue engineering
title_fullStr Surface modified cellulose scaffolds for tissue engineering
title_full_unstemmed Surface modified cellulose scaffolds for tissue engineering
title_short Surface modified cellulose scaffolds for tissue engineering
title_sort surface modified cellulose scaffolds for tissue engineering
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7175690/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32355428
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10570-016-1111-y
work_keys_str_mv AT courtenayjamesc surfacemodifiedcellulosescaffoldsfortissueengineering
AT johnsmarcusa surfacemodifiedcellulosescaffoldsfortissueengineering
AT galembeckfernando surfacemodifiedcellulosescaffoldsfortissueengineering
AT denekechristoph surfacemodifiedcellulosescaffoldsfortissueengineering
AT lanzonievandrom surfacemodifiedcellulosescaffoldsfortissueengineering
AT costacarlosa surfacemodifiedcellulosescaffoldsfortissueengineering
AT scottjanetl surfacemodifiedcellulosescaffoldsfortissueengineering
AT sharmarami surfacemodifiedcellulosescaffoldsfortissueengineering