Cargando…

Monitoring of radiologic disease activity by serum neurofilaments in MS

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) levels are associated with recent MRI activity in patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS). METHODS: This observational study included 163 patients (405 samples) with early RRMS from the Study of Early interferon-beta1a (IFN-β...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Uher, Tomas, Schaedelin, Sabine, Srpova, Barbora, Barro, Christian, Bergsland, Niels, Dwyer, Michael, Tyblova, Michaela, Vodehnalova, Karolina, Benkert, Pascal, Oechtering, Johanna, Leppert, David, Naegelin, Yvonne, Krasensky, Jan, Vaneckova, Manuela, Kubala Havrdova, Eva, Kappos, Ludwig, Zivadinov, Robert, Horakova, Dana, Kuhle, Jens, Kalincik, Tomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7176248/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32273481
http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/NXI.0000000000000714
_version_ 1783524986295681024
author Uher, Tomas
Schaedelin, Sabine
Srpova, Barbora
Barro, Christian
Bergsland, Niels
Dwyer, Michael
Tyblova, Michaela
Vodehnalova, Karolina
Benkert, Pascal
Oechtering, Johanna
Leppert, David
Naegelin, Yvonne
Krasensky, Jan
Vaneckova, Manuela
Kubala Havrdova, Eva
Kappos, Ludwig
Zivadinov, Robert
Horakova, Dana
Kuhle, Jens
Kalincik, Tomas
author_facet Uher, Tomas
Schaedelin, Sabine
Srpova, Barbora
Barro, Christian
Bergsland, Niels
Dwyer, Michael
Tyblova, Michaela
Vodehnalova, Karolina
Benkert, Pascal
Oechtering, Johanna
Leppert, David
Naegelin, Yvonne
Krasensky, Jan
Vaneckova, Manuela
Kubala Havrdova, Eva
Kappos, Ludwig
Zivadinov, Robert
Horakova, Dana
Kuhle, Jens
Kalincik, Tomas
author_sort Uher, Tomas
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To determine whether serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) levels are associated with recent MRI activity in patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS). METHODS: This observational study included 163 patients (405 samples) with early RRMS from the Study of Early interferon-beta1a (IFN-β1a) Treatment (SET) cohort and 179 patients (664 samples) with more advanced RRMS from the Genome-Wide Association Study of Multiple Sclerosis (GeneMSA) cohort. Based on annual brain MRI, we assessed the ability of sNfL cutoffs to reflect the presence of combined unique active lesions, defined as new/enlarging lesion compared with MRI in the preceding year or contrast-enhancing lesion. The probability of active MRI lesions among patients with different sNfL levels was estimated with generalized estimating equations models. RESULTS: From the sNfL samples ≥90th percentile, 81.6% of the SET (OR = 3.4, 95% CI = 1.8-6.4) and 48.9% of the GeneMSA cohort samples (OR = 2.6, 95% CI = 1.7-3.9) was associated with radiological disease activity on MRI. The sNfL level between the 10th and 30th percentile was reflective of negligible MRI activity: 1.4% (SET) and 6.5% (GeneMSA) of patients developed ≥3 active lesions, 5.8% (SET) and 6.5% (GeneMSA) developed ≥2 active lesions, and 34.8% (SET) and 11.8% (GeneMSA) showed ≥1 active lesion on brain MRI. The sNfL level <10th percentile was associated with even lower MRI activity. Similar results were found in a subgroup of clinically stable patients. CONCLUSIONS: Low sNfL levels (≤30th percentile) help identify patients with MS with very low probability of recent radiologic disease activity during the preceding year. This result suggests that in future, sNfL assessment may substitute the need for annual brain MRI monitoring in considerable number (23.1%–36.4%) of visits in clinically stable patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7176248
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71762482020-05-04 Monitoring of radiologic disease activity by serum neurofilaments in MS Uher, Tomas Schaedelin, Sabine Srpova, Barbora Barro, Christian Bergsland, Niels Dwyer, Michael Tyblova, Michaela Vodehnalova, Karolina Benkert, Pascal Oechtering, Johanna Leppert, David Naegelin, Yvonne Krasensky, Jan Vaneckova, Manuela Kubala Havrdova, Eva Kappos, Ludwig Zivadinov, Robert Horakova, Dana Kuhle, Jens Kalincik, Tomas Neurol Neuroimmunol Neuroinflamm Article OBJECTIVE: To determine whether serum neurofilament light chain (sNfL) levels are associated with recent MRI activity in patients with relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS). METHODS: This observational study included 163 patients (405 samples) with early RRMS from the Study of Early interferon-beta1a (IFN-β1a) Treatment (SET) cohort and 179 patients (664 samples) with more advanced RRMS from the Genome-Wide Association Study of Multiple Sclerosis (GeneMSA) cohort. Based on annual brain MRI, we assessed the ability of sNfL cutoffs to reflect the presence of combined unique active lesions, defined as new/enlarging lesion compared with MRI in the preceding year or contrast-enhancing lesion. The probability of active MRI lesions among patients with different sNfL levels was estimated with generalized estimating equations models. RESULTS: From the sNfL samples ≥90th percentile, 81.6% of the SET (OR = 3.4, 95% CI = 1.8-6.4) and 48.9% of the GeneMSA cohort samples (OR = 2.6, 95% CI = 1.7-3.9) was associated with radiological disease activity on MRI. The sNfL level between the 10th and 30th percentile was reflective of negligible MRI activity: 1.4% (SET) and 6.5% (GeneMSA) of patients developed ≥3 active lesions, 5.8% (SET) and 6.5% (GeneMSA) developed ≥2 active lesions, and 34.8% (SET) and 11.8% (GeneMSA) showed ≥1 active lesion on brain MRI. The sNfL level <10th percentile was associated with even lower MRI activity. Similar results were found in a subgroup of clinically stable patients. CONCLUSIONS: Low sNfL levels (≤30th percentile) help identify patients with MS with very low probability of recent radiologic disease activity during the preceding year. This result suggests that in future, sNfL assessment may substitute the need for annual brain MRI monitoring in considerable number (23.1%–36.4%) of visits in clinically stable patients. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-04-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7176248/ /pubmed/32273481 http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/NXI.0000000000000714 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Neurology. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , which permits downloading and sharing the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Article
Uher, Tomas
Schaedelin, Sabine
Srpova, Barbora
Barro, Christian
Bergsland, Niels
Dwyer, Michael
Tyblova, Michaela
Vodehnalova, Karolina
Benkert, Pascal
Oechtering, Johanna
Leppert, David
Naegelin, Yvonne
Krasensky, Jan
Vaneckova, Manuela
Kubala Havrdova, Eva
Kappos, Ludwig
Zivadinov, Robert
Horakova, Dana
Kuhle, Jens
Kalincik, Tomas
Monitoring of radiologic disease activity by serum neurofilaments in MS
title Monitoring of radiologic disease activity by serum neurofilaments in MS
title_full Monitoring of radiologic disease activity by serum neurofilaments in MS
title_fullStr Monitoring of radiologic disease activity by serum neurofilaments in MS
title_full_unstemmed Monitoring of radiologic disease activity by serum neurofilaments in MS
title_short Monitoring of radiologic disease activity by serum neurofilaments in MS
title_sort monitoring of radiologic disease activity by serum neurofilaments in ms
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7176248/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32273481
http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/NXI.0000000000000714
work_keys_str_mv AT uhertomas monitoringofradiologicdiseaseactivitybyserumneurofilamentsinms
AT schaedelinsabine monitoringofradiologicdiseaseactivitybyserumneurofilamentsinms
AT srpovabarbora monitoringofradiologicdiseaseactivitybyserumneurofilamentsinms
AT barrochristian monitoringofradiologicdiseaseactivitybyserumneurofilamentsinms
AT bergslandniels monitoringofradiologicdiseaseactivitybyserumneurofilamentsinms
AT dwyermichael monitoringofradiologicdiseaseactivitybyserumneurofilamentsinms
AT tyblovamichaela monitoringofradiologicdiseaseactivitybyserumneurofilamentsinms
AT vodehnalovakarolina monitoringofradiologicdiseaseactivitybyserumneurofilamentsinms
AT benkertpascal monitoringofradiologicdiseaseactivitybyserumneurofilamentsinms
AT oechteringjohanna monitoringofradiologicdiseaseactivitybyserumneurofilamentsinms
AT leppertdavid monitoringofradiologicdiseaseactivitybyserumneurofilamentsinms
AT naegelinyvonne monitoringofradiologicdiseaseactivitybyserumneurofilamentsinms
AT krasenskyjan monitoringofradiologicdiseaseactivitybyserumneurofilamentsinms
AT vaneckovamanuela monitoringofradiologicdiseaseactivitybyserumneurofilamentsinms
AT kubalahavrdovaeva monitoringofradiologicdiseaseactivitybyserumneurofilamentsinms
AT kapposludwig monitoringofradiologicdiseaseactivitybyserumneurofilamentsinms
AT zivadinovrobert monitoringofradiologicdiseaseactivitybyserumneurofilamentsinms
AT horakovadana monitoringofradiologicdiseaseactivitybyserumneurofilamentsinms
AT kuhlejens monitoringofradiologicdiseaseactivitybyserumneurofilamentsinms
AT kalinciktomas monitoringofradiologicdiseaseactivitybyserumneurofilamentsinms