Cargando…

A prospective study comparing water only with positive oral contrast in patients undergoing abdominal CT scan

Consecutive adults scheduled to undergo abdominal CT with oral contrast were asked to choose between 1000 ml water only or positive oral contrast (50 ml Télébrix-Gastro diluted in 950 ml water). Two abdominal radiologists independently reviewed each scan for image quality of the abdomen, the diagnos...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Wit, Pascale A. M., Tielbeek, Jeroen A. W., van Diepen, Pascal R., Oulad Abdennabi, Ikrame, Beenen, Ludo F. M., Bipat, Shandra
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7176630/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32321959
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63838-3
_version_ 1783525044711849984
author de Wit, Pascale A. M.
Tielbeek, Jeroen A. W.
van Diepen, Pascal R.
Oulad Abdennabi, Ikrame
Beenen, Ludo F. M.
Bipat, Shandra
author_facet de Wit, Pascale A. M.
Tielbeek, Jeroen A. W.
van Diepen, Pascal R.
Oulad Abdennabi, Ikrame
Beenen, Ludo F. M.
Bipat, Shandra
author_sort de Wit, Pascale A. M.
collection PubMed
description Consecutive adults scheduled to undergo abdominal CT with oral contrast were asked to choose between 1000 ml water only or positive oral contrast (50 ml Télébrix-Gastro diluted in 950 ml water). Two abdominal radiologists independently reviewed each scan for image quality of the abdomen, the diagnostic confidence per system (gastrointestinalsystem/organs/peritoneum/retroperitoneum/lymph nodes) and overall diagnostic confidence to address the clinical question (not able/partial able/fully able). Radiation exposure was extracted from dose reports. Differences between both groups were evaluated by Student’s t-test, Mann-Whitney-U-test or chi-square-test. Of the 320participants, 233chose water only. All baseline characteristics, image quality of the abdomen and the diagnostic confidence of the organs were comparable between groups and both observers. Diagnostic confidence in the water only group was more commonly scored as less than good by observer1. The results were as follows: the gastrointestinal system(18/233vs1/87; p = 0.031), peritoneum (21/233vs1/87; p = 0.012), retroperitoneum (11/233vs0/87; p = 0.040) and lymph nodes (11/233vs0/87; p = 0.040). These structures were scored as comparable between both groups by observer2. The diagnostic confidence to address the clinical question could be partially addressed in 6/233 vs 0/87 patients (p = 0.259). The water only group showed a tendency towards less radiation exposure. In summary, most scan ratings were comparable between positive contrast and water only, but slightly favored positive oral contrast for one reader for some abdominal structures. Therefore, water only can replace positive oral contrast in the majority of the outpatients scheduled to undergo an abdominal CT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7176630
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71766302020-04-27 A prospective study comparing water only with positive oral contrast in patients undergoing abdominal CT scan de Wit, Pascale A. M. Tielbeek, Jeroen A. W. van Diepen, Pascal R. Oulad Abdennabi, Ikrame Beenen, Ludo F. M. Bipat, Shandra Sci Rep Article Consecutive adults scheduled to undergo abdominal CT with oral contrast were asked to choose between 1000 ml water only or positive oral contrast (50 ml Télébrix-Gastro diluted in 950 ml water). Two abdominal radiologists independently reviewed each scan for image quality of the abdomen, the diagnostic confidence per system (gastrointestinalsystem/organs/peritoneum/retroperitoneum/lymph nodes) and overall diagnostic confidence to address the clinical question (not able/partial able/fully able). Radiation exposure was extracted from dose reports. Differences between both groups were evaluated by Student’s t-test, Mann-Whitney-U-test or chi-square-test. Of the 320participants, 233chose water only. All baseline characteristics, image quality of the abdomen and the diagnostic confidence of the organs were comparable between groups and both observers. Diagnostic confidence in the water only group was more commonly scored as less than good by observer1. The results were as follows: the gastrointestinal system(18/233vs1/87; p = 0.031), peritoneum (21/233vs1/87; p = 0.012), retroperitoneum (11/233vs0/87; p = 0.040) and lymph nodes (11/233vs0/87; p = 0.040). These structures were scored as comparable between both groups by observer2. The diagnostic confidence to address the clinical question could be partially addressed in 6/233 vs 0/87 patients (p = 0.259). The water only group showed a tendency towards less radiation exposure. In summary, most scan ratings were comparable between positive contrast and water only, but slightly favored positive oral contrast for one reader for some abdominal structures. Therefore, water only can replace positive oral contrast in the majority of the outpatients scheduled to undergo an abdominal CT. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7176630/ /pubmed/32321959 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63838-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
de Wit, Pascale A. M.
Tielbeek, Jeroen A. W.
van Diepen, Pascal R.
Oulad Abdennabi, Ikrame
Beenen, Ludo F. M.
Bipat, Shandra
A prospective study comparing water only with positive oral contrast in patients undergoing abdominal CT scan
title A prospective study comparing water only with positive oral contrast in patients undergoing abdominal CT scan
title_full A prospective study comparing water only with positive oral contrast in patients undergoing abdominal CT scan
title_fullStr A prospective study comparing water only with positive oral contrast in patients undergoing abdominal CT scan
title_full_unstemmed A prospective study comparing water only with positive oral contrast in patients undergoing abdominal CT scan
title_short A prospective study comparing water only with positive oral contrast in patients undergoing abdominal CT scan
title_sort prospective study comparing water only with positive oral contrast in patients undergoing abdominal ct scan
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7176630/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32321959
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63838-3
work_keys_str_mv AT dewitpascaleam aprospectivestudycomparingwateronlywithpositiveoralcontrastinpatientsundergoingabdominalctscan
AT tielbeekjeroenaw aprospectivestudycomparingwateronlywithpositiveoralcontrastinpatientsundergoingabdominalctscan
AT vandiepenpascalr aprospectivestudycomparingwateronlywithpositiveoralcontrastinpatientsundergoingabdominalctscan
AT ouladabdennabiikrame aprospectivestudycomparingwateronlywithpositiveoralcontrastinpatientsundergoingabdominalctscan
AT beenenludofm aprospectivestudycomparingwateronlywithpositiveoralcontrastinpatientsundergoingabdominalctscan
AT bipatshandra aprospectivestudycomparingwateronlywithpositiveoralcontrastinpatientsundergoingabdominalctscan
AT dewitpascaleam prospectivestudycomparingwateronlywithpositiveoralcontrastinpatientsundergoingabdominalctscan
AT tielbeekjeroenaw prospectivestudycomparingwateronlywithpositiveoralcontrastinpatientsundergoingabdominalctscan
AT vandiepenpascalr prospectivestudycomparingwateronlywithpositiveoralcontrastinpatientsundergoingabdominalctscan
AT ouladabdennabiikrame prospectivestudycomparingwateronlywithpositiveoralcontrastinpatientsundergoingabdominalctscan
AT beenenludofm prospectivestudycomparingwateronlywithpositiveoralcontrastinpatientsundergoingabdominalctscan
AT bipatshandra prospectivestudycomparingwateronlywithpositiveoralcontrastinpatientsundergoingabdominalctscan