Cargando…
A prospective study comparing water only with positive oral contrast in patients undergoing abdominal CT scan
Consecutive adults scheduled to undergo abdominal CT with oral contrast were asked to choose between 1000 ml water only or positive oral contrast (50 ml Télébrix-Gastro diluted in 950 ml water). Two abdominal radiologists independently reviewed each scan for image quality of the abdomen, the diagnos...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7176630/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32321959 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63838-3 |
_version_ | 1783525044711849984 |
---|---|
author | de Wit, Pascale A. M. Tielbeek, Jeroen A. W. van Diepen, Pascal R. Oulad Abdennabi, Ikrame Beenen, Ludo F. M. Bipat, Shandra |
author_facet | de Wit, Pascale A. M. Tielbeek, Jeroen A. W. van Diepen, Pascal R. Oulad Abdennabi, Ikrame Beenen, Ludo F. M. Bipat, Shandra |
author_sort | de Wit, Pascale A. M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Consecutive adults scheduled to undergo abdominal CT with oral contrast were asked to choose between 1000 ml water only or positive oral contrast (50 ml Télébrix-Gastro diluted in 950 ml water). Two abdominal radiologists independently reviewed each scan for image quality of the abdomen, the diagnostic confidence per system (gastrointestinalsystem/organs/peritoneum/retroperitoneum/lymph nodes) and overall diagnostic confidence to address the clinical question (not able/partial able/fully able). Radiation exposure was extracted from dose reports. Differences between both groups were evaluated by Student’s t-test, Mann-Whitney-U-test or chi-square-test. Of the 320participants, 233chose water only. All baseline characteristics, image quality of the abdomen and the diagnostic confidence of the organs were comparable between groups and both observers. Diagnostic confidence in the water only group was more commonly scored as less than good by observer1. The results were as follows: the gastrointestinal system(18/233vs1/87; p = 0.031), peritoneum (21/233vs1/87; p = 0.012), retroperitoneum (11/233vs0/87; p = 0.040) and lymph nodes (11/233vs0/87; p = 0.040). These structures were scored as comparable between both groups by observer2. The diagnostic confidence to address the clinical question could be partially addressed in 6/233 vs 0/87 patients (p = 0.259). The water only group showed a tendency towards less radiation exposure. In summary, most scan ratings were comparable between positive contrast and water only, but slightly favored positive oral contrast for one reader for some abdominal structures. Therefore, water only can replace positive oral contrast in the majority of the outpatients scheduled to undergo an abdominal CT. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7176630 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71766302020-04-27 A prospective study comparing water only with positive oral contrast in patients undergoing abdominal CT scan de Wit, Pascale A. M. Tielbeek, Jeroen A. W. van Diepen, Pascal R. Oulad Abdennabi, Ikrame Beenen, Ludo F. M. Bipat, Shandra Sci Rep Article Consecutive adults scheduled to undergo abdominal CT with oral contrast were asked to choose between 1000 ml water only or positive oral contrast (50 ml Télébrix-Gastro diluted in 950 ml water). Two abdominal radiologists independently reviewed each scan for image quality of the abdomen, the diagnostic confidence per system (gastrointestinalsystem/organs/peritoneum/retroperitoneum/lymph nodes) and overall diagnostic confidence to address the clinical question (not able/partial able/fully able). Radiation exposure was extracted from dose reports. Differences between both groups were evaluated by Student’s t-test, Mann-Whitney-U-test or chi-square-test. Of the 320participants, 233chose water only. All baseline characteristics, image quality of the abdomen and the diagnostic confidence of the organs were comparable between groups and both observers. Diagnostic confidence in the water only group was more commonly scored as less than good by observer1. The results were as follows: the gastrointestinal system(18/233vs1/87; p = 0.031), peritoneum (21/233vs1/87; p = 0.012), retroperitoneum (11/233vs0/87; p = 0.040) and lymph nodes (11/233vs0/87; p = 0.040). These structures were scored as comparable between both groups by observer2. The diagnostic confidence to address the clinical question could be partially addressed in 6/233 vs 0/87 patients (p = 0.259). The water only group showed a tendency towards less radiation exposure. In summary, most scan ratings were comparable between positive contrast and water only, but slightly favored positive oral contrast for one reader for some abdominal structures. Therefore, water only can replace positive oral contrast in the majority of the outpatients scheduled to undergo an abdominal CT. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7176630/ /pubmed/32321959 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63838-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article de Wit, Pascale A. M. Tielbeek, Jeroen A. W. van Diepen, Pascal R. Oulad Abdennabi, Ikrame Beenen, Ludo F. M. Bipat, Shandra A prospective study comparing water only with positive oral contrast in patients undergoing abdominal CT scan |
title | A prospective study comparing water only with positive oral contrast in patients undergoing abdominal CT scan |
title_full | A prospective study comparing water only with positive oral contrast in patients undergoing abdominal CT scan |
title_fullStr | A prospective study comparing water only with positive oral contrast in patients undergoing abdominal CT scan |
title_full_unstemmed | A prospective study comparing water only with positive oral contrast in patients undergoing abdominal CT scan |
title_short | A prospective study comparing water only with positive oral contrast in patients undergoing abdominal CT scan |
title_sort | prospective study comparing water only with positive oral contrast in patients undergoing abdominal ct scan |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7176630/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32321959 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-63838-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dewitpascaleam aprospectivestudycomparingwateronlywithpositiveoralcontrastinpatientsundergoingabdominalctscan AT tielbeekjeroenaw aprospectivestudycomparingwateronlywithpositiveoralcontrastinpatientsundergoingabdominalctscan AT vandiepenpascalr aprospectivestudycomparingwateronlywithpositiveoralcontrastinpatientsundergoingabdominalctscan AT ouladabdennabiikrame aprospectivestudycomparingwateronlywithpositiveoralcontrastinpatientsundergoingabdominalctscan AT beenenludofm aprospectivestudycomparingwateronlywithpositiveoralcontrastinpatientsundergoingabdominalctscan AT bipatshandra aprospectivestudycomparingwateronlywithpositiveoralcontrastinpatientsundergoingabdominalctscan AT dewitpascaleam prospectivestudycomparingwateronlywithpositiveoralcontrastinpatientsundergoingabdominalctscan AT tielbeekjeroenaw prospectivestudycomparingwateronlywithpositiveoralcontrastinpatientsundergoingabdominalctscan AT vandiepenpascalr prospectivestudycomparingwateronlywithpositiveoralcontrastinpatientsundergoingabdominalctscan AT ouladabdennabiikrame prospectivestudycomparingwateronlywithpositiveoralcontrastinpatientsundergoingabdominalctscan AT beenenludofm prospectivestudycomparingwateronlywithpositiveoralcontrastinpatientsundergoingabdominalctscan AT bipatshandra prospectivestudycomparingwateronlywithpositiveoralcontrastinpatientsundergoingabdominalctscan |