Cargando…

The Prognostic Significance of Metastatic Nodal Size in Non-surgical Patients With Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Background: The present study aimed to determine the prognostic value of the size of metastatic lymph node (LN) in non-surgical patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Methods: Three hundred seventy-six ESCC patients treated with definitive (chemo-) radiotherapy from January 2013 to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhao, Zongxing, Zhang, Yanan, Wang, Xin, Wang, Peiliang, Geng, Xiaotao, Zhu, Liqiong, Li, Minghuan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7176819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32373526
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.00523
_version_ 1783525078315565056
author Zhao, Zongxing
Zhang, Yanan
Wang, Xin
Wang, Peiliang
Geng, Xiaotao
Zhu, Liqiong
Li, Minghuan
author_facet Zhao, Zongxing
Zhang, Yanan
Wang, Xin
Wang, Peiliang
Geng, Xiaotao
Zhu, Liqiong
Li, Minghuan
author_sort Zhao, Zongxing
collection PubMed
description Background: The present study aimed to determine the prognostic value of the size of metastatic lymph node (LN) in non-surgical patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Methods: Three hundred seventy-six ESCC patients treated with definitive (chemo-) radiotherapy from January 2013 to March 2016 were reviewed. We analyzed potential associations of metastatic nodal size with responses, patterns of failure, and survival. Log-rank testing and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess the impact of the clinical factors on survival. Results: The 3-years over survival (OS) rates following a median follow-up of 28.2 months were 53.2, 46.2, 35.5, and 22.7% for the N0 group, the >0.5 to ≤1 cm group, the >1 to ≤2 cm group, and the >2 cm group, respectively. The progression-free survival (PFS) rates for 2 years were 50.9, 44.2, 26.6, and 23.4% for the N0 group, the >0.5 to ≤1 cm group, the >1 to ≤2 cm group, and the >2 cm group, respectively. The objective response rates (ORR) for the 280 patients with metastatic LNs were 43.1% for the LN >0.5 to ≤1 cm group, 46.9% for the LN >1 to ≤2 cm group, and 25.5% for the LN ≥2 cm group. The LN >2 cm group had the worst ORR of the three groups with LNs. Gross tumor volume (GTV) failure was the most common failure pattern, followed by distant failure and out of GTV LN failure, with incidences of 47.9% (180 of 376), 42% (158 of 376), and 13.8% (52 of 376), respectively. Nodal size correlated statistically with GTV failure and distant failure but not with out-of-GTV nodal failure. After adjusting for age, sex, T category, Primary tumor location, and CRT, the size of metastatic LNs was an independent prognostic factor for OS and PFS in multivariate analyses. Conclusions: Nodal size is one of prognostic factors for non-surgical patients with ESCC and correlated statistically with GTV failure and distant failure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7176819
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71768192020-05-05 The Prognostic Significance of Metastatic Nodal Size in Non-surgical Patients With Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Zhao, Zongxing Zhang, Yanan Wang, Xin Wang, Peiliang Geng, Xiaotao Zhu, Liqiong Li, Minghuan Front Oncol Oncology Background: The present study aimed to determine the prognostic value of the size of metastatic lymph node (LN) in non-surgical patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Methods: Three hundred seventy-six ESCC patients treated with definitive (chemo-) radiotherapy from January 2013 to March 2016 were reviewed. We analyzed potential associations of metastatic nodal size with responses, patterns of failure, and survival. Log-rank testing and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to assess the impact of the clinical factors on survival. Results: The 3-years over survival (OS) rates following a median follow-up of 28.2 months were 53.2, 46.2, 35.5, and 22.7% for the N0 group, the >0.5 to ≤1 cm group, the >1 to ≤2 cm group, and the >2 cm group, respectively. The progression-free survival (PFS) rates for 2 years were 50.9, 44.2, 26.6, and 23.4% for the N0 group, the >0.5 to ≤1 cm group, the >1 to ≤2 cm group, and the >2 cm group, respectively. The objective response rates (ORR) for the 280 patients with metastatic LNs were 43.1% for the LN >0.5 to ≤1 cm group, 46.9% for the LN >1 to ≤2 cm group, and 25.5% for the LN ≥2 cm group. The LN >2 cm group had the worst ORR of the three groups with LNs. Gross tumor volume (GTV) failure was the most common failure pattern, followed by distant failure and out of GTV LN failure, with incidences of 47.9% (180 of 376), 42% (158 of 376), and 13.8% (52 of 376), respectively. Nodal size correlated statistically with GTV failure and distant failure but not with out-of-GTV nodal failure. After adjusting for age, sex, T category, Primary tumor location, and CRT, the size of metastatic LNs was an independent prognostic factor for OS and PFS in multivariate analyses. Conclusions: Nodal size is one of prognostic factors for non-surgical patients with ESCC and correlated statistically with GTV failure and distant failure. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7176819/ /pubmed/32373526 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.00523 Text en Copyright © 2020 Zhao, Zhang, Wang, Wang, Geng, Zhu and Li. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Zhao, Zongxing
Zhang, Yanan
Wang, Xin
Wang, Peiliang
Geng, Xiaotao
Zhu, Liqiong
Li, Minghuan
The Prognostic Significance of Metastatic Nodal Size in Non-surgical Patients With Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
title The Prognostic Significance of Metastatic Nodal Size in Non-surgical Patients With Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
title_full The Prognostic Significance of Metastatic Nodal Size in Non-surgical Patients With Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
title_fullStr The Prognostic Significance of Metastatic Nodal Size in Non-surgical Patients With Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed The Prognostic Significance of Metastatic Nodal Size in Non-surgical Patients With Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
title_short The Prognostic Significance of Metastatic Nodal Size in Non-surgical Patients With Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
title_sort prognostic significance of metastatic nodal size in non-surgical patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7176819/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32373526
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.00523
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaozongxing theprognosticsignificanceofmetastaticnodalsizeinnonsurgicalpatientswithesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT zhangyanan theprognosticsignificanceofmetastaticnodalsizeinnonsurgicalpatientswithesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT wangxin theprognosticsignificanceofmetastaticnodalsizeinnonsurgicalpatientswithesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT wangpeiliang theprognosticsignificanceofmetastaticnodalsizeinnonsurgicalpatientswithesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT gengxiaotao theprognosticsignificanceofmetastaticnodalsizeinnonsurgicalpatientswithesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT zhuliqiong theprognosticsignificanceofmetastaticnodalsizeinnonsurgicalpatientswithesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT liminghuan theprognosticsignificanceofmetastaticnodalsizeinnonsurgicalpatientswithesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT zhaozongxing prognosticsignificanceofmetastaticnodalsizeinnonsurgicalpatientswithesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT zhangyanan prognosticsignificanceofmetastaticnodalsizeinnonsurgicalpatientswithesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT wangxin prognosticsignificanceofmetastaticnodalsizeinnonsurgicalpatientswithesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT wangpeiliang prognosticsignificanceofmetastaticnodalsizeinnonsurgicalpatientswithesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT gengxiaotao prognosticsignificanceofmetastaticnodalsizeinnonsurgicalpatientswithesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT zhuliqiong prognosticsignificanceofmetastaticnodalsizeinnonsurgicalpatientswithesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma
AT liminghuan prognosticsignificanceofmetastaticnodalsizeinnonsurgicalpatientswithesophagealsquamouscellcarcinoma