Cargando…

Measuring outcomes in self-harm trials: what is important and what is achievable?

There are a number of candidates as useful outcomes in self-harm research – repetition of self-harm; symptom states; quality of life, social participation. Repetition of self-harm has been the predominant choice of researchers, not least because of its status as a risk for eventual suicide. Use of a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: House, Allan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7176835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32046812
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2020.5
_version_ 1783525082133430272
author House, Allan
author_facet House, Allan
author_sort House, Allan
collection PubMed
description There are a number of candidates as useful outcomes in self-harm research – repetition of self-harm; symptom states; quality of life, social participation. Repetition of self-harm has been the predominant choice of researchers, not least because of its status as a risk for eventual suicide. Use of alternatives would respond to the preferences of study participants, but there are substantial methodological constraints. Nonetheless more attention could be given to the use of outcomes other than repetition. Another option is to broaden the approach to evaluation design, incorporating advances in the use of observational data either alone or linked to data from trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7176835
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71768352020-04-28 Measuring outcomes in self-harm trials: what is important and what is achievable? House, Allan BJPsych Open Editorial There are a number of candidates as useful outcomes in self-harm research – repetition of self-harm; symptom states; quality of life, social participation. Repetition of self-harm has been the predominant choice of researchers, not least because of its status as a risk for eventual suicide. Use of alternatives would respond to the preferences of study participants, but there are substantial methodological constraints. Nonetheless more attention could be given to the use of outcomes other than repetition. Another option is to broaden the approach to evaluation design, incorporating advances in the use of observational data either alone or linked to data from trials. Cambridge University Press 2020-02-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7176835/ /pubmed/32046812 http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2020.5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Editorial
House, Allan
Measuring outcomes in self-harm trials: what is important and what is achievable?
title Measuring outcomes in self-harm trials: what is important and what is achievable?
title_full Measuring outcomes in self-harm trials: what is important and what is achievable?
title_fullStr Measuring outcomes in self-harm trials: what is important and what is achievable?
title_full_unstemmed Measuring outcomes in self-harm trials: what is important and what is achievable?
title_short Measuring outcomes in self-harm trials: what is important and what is achievable?
title_sort measuring outcomes in self-harm trials: what is important and what is achievable?
topic Editorial
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7176835/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32046812
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2020.5
work_keys_str_mv AT houseallan measuringoutcomesinselfharmtrialswhatisimportantandwhatisachievable