Cargando…

Development and validation of a 10‐gene prognostic signature for acute myeloid leukaemia

Acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) is the most common type of adult acute leukaemia and has a poor prognosis. Thus, optimal risk stratification is of greatest importance for reasonable choice of treatment and prognostic evaluation. For our study, a total of 1707 samples of AML patients from three public...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Zuyi, Shang, Jun, Li, Ning, Zhang, Liang, Tang, Tingting, Tian, Guoyan, Chen, Xiaohui
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7176885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32150667
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.15109
_version_ 1783525093943541760
author Yang, Zuyi
Shang, Jun
Li, Ning
Zhang, Liang
Tang, Tingting
Tian, Guoyan
Chen, Xiaohui
author_facet Yang, Zuyi
Shang, Jun
Li, Ning
Zhang, Liang
Tang, Tingting
Tian, Guoyan
Chen, Xiaohui
author_sort Yang, Zuyi
collection PubMed
description Acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) is the most common type of adult acute leukaemia and has a poor prognosis. Thus, optimal risk stratification is of greatest importance for reasonable choice of treatment and prognostic evaluation. For our study, a total of 1707 samples of AML patients from three public databases were divided into meta‐training, meta‐testing and validation sets. The meta‐training set was used to build risk prediction model, and the other four data sets were employed for validation. By log‐rank test and univariate COX regression analysis as well as LASSO‐COX, AML patients were divided into high‐risk and low‐risk groups based on AML risk score (AMLRS) which was constituted by 10 survival‐related genes. In meta‐training, meta‐testing and validation sets, the patient in the low‐risk group all had a significantly longer OS (overall survival) than those in the high‐risk group (P < .001), and the area under ROC curve (AUC) by time‐dependent ROC was 0.5854‐0.7905 for 1 year, 0.6652‐0.8066 for 3 years and 0.6622‐0.8034 for 5 years. Multivariate COX regression analysis indicated that AMLRS was an independent prognostic factor in four data sets. Nomogram combining the AMLRS and two clinical parameters performed well in predicting 1‐year, 3‐year and 5‐year OS. Finally, we created a web‐based prognostic model to predict the prognosis of AML patients (https://tcgi.shinyapps.io/amlrs_nomogram/).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7176885
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71768852020-04-24 Development and validation of a 10‐gene prognostic signature for acute myeloid leukaemia Yang, Zuyi Shang, Jun Li, Ning Zhang, Liang Tang, Tingting Tian, Guoyan Chen, Xiaohui J Cell Mol Med Original Articles Acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) is the most common type of adult acute leukaemia and has a poor prognosis. Thus, optimal risk stratification is of greatest importance for reasonable choice of treatment and prognostic evaluation. For our study, a total of 1707 samples of AML patients from three public databases were divided into meta‐training, meta‐testing and validation sets. The meta‐training set was used to build risk prediction model, and the other four data sets were employed for validation. By log‐rank test and univariate COX regression analysis as well as LASSO‐COX, AML patients were divided into high‐risk and low‐risk groups based on AML risk score (AMLRS) which was constituted by 10 survival‐related genes. In meta‐training, meta‐testing and validation sets, the patient in the low‐risk group all had a significantly longer OS (overall survival) than those in the high‐risk group (P < .001), and the area under ROC curve (AUC) by time‐dependent ROC was 0.5854‐0.7905 for 1 year, 0.6652‐0.8066 for 3 years and 0.6622‐0.8034 for 5 years. Multivariate COX regression analysis indicated that AMLRS was an independent prognostic factor in four data sets. Nomogram combining the AMLRS and two clinical parameters performed well in predicting 1‐year, 3‐year and 5‐year OS. Finally, we created a web‐based prognostic model to predict the prognosis of AML patients (https://tcgi.shinyapps.io/amlrs_nomogram/). John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-03-09 2020-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7176885/ /pubmed/32150667 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.15109 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine published by Foundation for Cellular and Molecular Medicine and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Yang, Zuyi
Shang, Jun
Li, Ning
Zhang, Liang
Tang, Tingting
Tian, Guoyan
Chen, Xiaohui
Development and validation of a 10‐gene prognostic signature for acute myeloid leukaemia
title Development and validation of a 10‐gene prognostic signature for acute myeloid leukaemia
title_full Development and validation of a 10‐gene prognostic signature for acute myeloid leukaemia
title_fullStr Development and validation of a 10‐gene prognostic signature for acute myeloid leukaemia
title_full_unstemmed Development and validation of a 10‐gene prognostic signature for acute myeloid leukaemia
title_short Development and validation of a 10‐gene prognostic signature for acute myeloid leukaemia
title_sort development and validation of a 10‐gene prognostic signature for acute myeloid leukaemia
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7176885/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32150667
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jcmm.15109
work_keys_str_mv AT yangzuyi developmentandvalidationofa10geneprognosticsignatureforacutemyeloidleukaemia
AT shangjun developmentandvalidationofa10geneprognosticsignatureforacutemyeloidleukaemia
AT lining developmentandvalidationofa10geneprognosticsignatureforacutemyeloidleukaemia
AT zhangliang developmentandvalidationofa10geneprognosticsignatureforacutemyeloidleukaemia
AT tangtingting developmentandvalidationofa10geneprognosticsignatureforacutemyeloidleukaemia
AT tianguoyan developmentandvalidationofa10geneprognosticsignatureforacutemyeloidleukaemia
AT chenxiaohui developmentandvalidationofa10geneprognosticsignatureforacutemyeloidleukaemia