Cargando…

Implementation outcomes and strategies for depression interventions in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review

BACKGROUND: We systematically reviewed implementation research targeting depression interventions in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) to assess gaps in methodological coverage. METHODS: PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and EMBASE were searched for evaluations of depression interventions in LMICs re...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wagenaar, Bradley H., Hammett, Wilson H., Jackson, Courtney, Atkins, Dana L., Belus, Jennifer M., Kemp, Christopher G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Cambridge University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7176918/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32346482
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2020.1
_version_ 1783525101744947200
author Wagenaar, Bradley H.
Hammett, Wilson H.
Jackson, Courtney
Atkins, Dana L.
Belus, Jennifer M.
Kemp, Christopher G.
author_facet Wagenaar, Bradley H.
Hammett, Wilson H.
Jackson, Courtney
Atkins, Dana L.
Belus, Jennifer M.
Kemp, Christopher G.
author_sort Wagenaar, Bradley H.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We systematically reviewed implementation research targeting depression interventions in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) to assess gaps in methodological coverage. METHODS: PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and EMBASE were searched for evaluations of depression interventions in LMICs reporting at least one implementation outcome published through March 2019. RESULTS: A total of 8714 studies were screened, 759 were assessed for eligibility, and 79 studies met inclusion criteria. Common implementation outcomes reported were acceptability (n = 50; 63.3%), feasibility (n = 28; 35.4%), and fidelity (n = 18; 22.8%). Only four studies (5.1%) reported adoption or penetration, and three (3.8%) reported sustainability. The Sub-Saharan Africa region (n = 29; 36.7%) had the most studies. The majority of studies (n = 59; 74.7%) reported outcomes for a depression intervention implemented in pilot researcher-controlled settings. Studies commonly focused on Hybrid Type-1 effectiveness-implementation designs (n = 53; 67.1), followed by Hybrid Type-3 (n = 16; 20.3%). Only 21 studies (26.6%) tested an implementation strategy, with the most common being revising professional roles (n = 10; 47.6%). The most common intervention modality was individual psychotherapy (n = 30; 38.0%). Common study designs were mixed methods (n = 27; 34.2%), quasi-experimental uncontrolled pre-post (n = 17; 21.5%), and individual randomized trials (n = 16; 20.3). CONCLUSIONS: Existing research has focused on early-stage implementation outcomes. Most studies have utilized Hybrid Type-1 designs, with the primary aim to test intervention effectiveness delivered in researcher-controlled settings. Future research should focus on testing and optimizing implementation strategies to promote scale-up of evidence-based depression interventions in routine care. These studies should use high-quality pragmatic designs and focus on later-stage implementation outcomes such as cost, penetration, and sustainability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7176918
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71769182020-04-28 Implementation outcomes and strategies for depression interventions in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review Wagenaar, Bradley H. Hammett, Wilson H. Jackson, Courtney Atkins, Dana L. Belus, Jennifer M. Kemp, Christopher G. Glob Ment Health (Camb) Review BACKGROUND: We systematically reviewed implementation research targeting depression interventions in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) to assess gaps in methodological coverage. METHODS: PubMed, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and EMBASE were searched for evaluations of depression interventions in LMICs reporting at least one implementation outcome published through March 2019. RESULTS: A total of 8714 studies were screened, 759 were assessed for eligibility, and 79 studies met inclusion criteria. Common implementation outcomes reported were acceptability (n = 50; 63.3%), feasibility (n = 28; 35.4%), and fidelity (n = 18; 22.8%). Only four studies (5.1%) reported adoption or penetration, and three (3.8%) reported sustainability. The Sub-Saharan Africa region (n = 29; 36.7%) had the most studies. The majority of studies (n = 59; 74.7%) reported outcomes for a depression intervention implemented in pilot researcher-controlled settings. Studies commonly focused on Hybrid Type-1 effectiveness-implementation designs (n = 53; 67.1), followed by Hybrid Type-3 (n = 16; 20.3%). Only 21 studies (26.6%) tested an implementation strategy, with the most common being revising professional roles (n = 10; 47.6%). The most common intervention modality was individual psychotherapy (n = 30; 38.0%). Common study designs were mixed methods (n = 27; 34.2%), quasi-experimental uncontrolled pre-post (n = 17; 21.5%), and individual randomized trials (n = 16; 20.3). CONCLUSIONS: Existing research has focused on early-stage implementation outcomes. Most studies have utilized Hybrid Type-1 designs, with the primary aim to test intervention effectiveness delivered in researcher-controlled settings. Future research should focus on testing and optimizing implementation strategies to promote scale-up of evidence-based depression interventions in routine care. These studies should use high-quality pragmatic designs and focus on later-stage implementation outcomes such as cost, penetration, and sustainability. Cambridge University Press 2020-03-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7176918/ /pubmed/32346482 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2020.1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Wagenaar, Bradley H.
Hammett, Wilson H.
Jackson, Courtney
Atkins, Dana L.
Belus, Jennifer M.
Kemp, Christopher G.
Implementation outcomes and strategies for depression interventions in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review
title Implementation outcomes and strategies for depression interventions in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review
title_full Implementation outcomes and strategies for depression interventions in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review
title_fullStr Implementation outcomes and strategies for depression interventions in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Implementation outcomes and strategies for depression interventions in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review
title_short Implementation outcomes and strategies for depression interventions in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review
title_sort implementation outcomes and strategies for depression interventions in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7176918/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32346482
http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/gmh.2020.1
work_keys_str_mv AT wagenaarbradleyh implementationoutcomesandstrategiesfordepressioninterventionsinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreview
AT hammettwilsonh implementationoutcomesandstrategiesfordepressioninterventionsinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreview
AT jacksoncourtney implementationoutcomesandstrategiesfordepressioninterventionsinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreview
AT atkinsdanal implementationoutcomesandstrategiesfordepressioninterventionsinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreview
AT belusjenniferm implementationoutcomesandstrategiesfordepressioninterventionsinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreview
AT kempchristopherg implementationoutcomesandstrategiesfordepressioninterventionsinlowandmiddleincomecountriesasystematicreview