Cargando…
Pretreatment Lymph Node Metastasis as a Prognostic Significance in Cervical Cancer: Comparison between Disease Status
PURPOSE: Lymph node metastasis (LNM) is the most significant prognostic factor in cervical cancer that was recently incorporated into the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system. This study was performed to evaluate whether the prognostic significance of LNM diffe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Korean Cancer Association
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7176965/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31671937 http://dx.doi.org/10.4143/crt.2019.328 |
_version_ | 1783525114639286272 |
---|---|
author | Jeong, Soo Young Park, Hyea Kim, Myeong Seon Kang, Jun Hyeok Paik, E Sun Lee, Yoo-Young Kim, Tae Joong Lee, Jeong Won Kim, Byoung-Gie Bae, Duk Soo Choi, Chel Hun |
author_facet | Jeong, Soo Young Park, Hyea Kim, Myeong Seon Kang, Jun Hyeok Paik, E Sun Lee, Yoo-Young Kim, Tae Joong Lee, Jeong Won Kim, Byoung-Gie Bae, Duk Soo Choi, Chel Hun |
author_sort | Jeong, Soo Young |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Lymph node metastasis (LNM) is the most significant prognostic factor in cervical cancer that was recently incorporated into the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system. This study was performed to evaluate whether the prognostic significance of LNM differs according to disease status. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with FIGO stage IB or higher cervical cancer who had pretreatment computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging studies as well as long-term follow-up were enrolled in this retrospective study. The hazard ratio (HR) of Cox regression was used to determine the prognostic significance of LNM. The HRs were compared between the different tumor groups (based on stage, histology, tumor size, primary treatment, age, parametrium involvement, and lymphovascular space invasion). RESULTS: A total of 970 patients treated between January 1999 and December 2007 were included. The pretreatment LNM had prognostic significance in patients with stage IB1/IIA (HR for progression-free survival 2.10, p=0.001; HR for overall survival 1.99, p=0.005). However, the significance gradually decreased or disappeared with advancing stages. Similarly, the prognostic significance of the pretreatment LNM decreased with advancing disease status, including old age, parametrial involvement or lymphovascular space involvement. In contrast, the tumor size was associated with the prognostic significance of LNM with advancing status. The significance of the clinical LNM did not reflect the significance of the clinical stage. In contrast, the tumor size, parametrial involvement, and significance of the pathologic LNM reflected the clinical stage. CONCLUSION: In patients with cervical cancer, pretreatment LNM on imaging has different clinical significance depending on the tumor status. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7176965 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Korean Cancer Association |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71769652020-04-27 Pretreatment Lymph Node Metastasis as a Prognostic Significance in Cervical Cancer: Comparison between Disease Status Jeong, Soo Young Park, Hyea Kim, Myeong Seon Kang, Jun Hyeok Paik, E Sun Lee, Yoo-Young Kim, Tae Joong Lee, Jeong Won Kim, Byoung-Gie Bae, Duk Soo Choi, Chel Hun Cancer Res Treat Original Article PURPOSE: Lymph node metastasis (LNM) is the most significant prognostic factor in cervical cancer that was recently incorporated into the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system. This study was performed to evaluate whether the prognostic significance of LNM differs according to disease status. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with FIGO stage IB or higher cervical cancer who had pretreatment computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging studies as well as long-term follow-up were enrolled in this retrospective study. The hazard ratio (HR) of Cox regression was used to determine the prognostic significance of LNM. The HRs were compared between the different tumor groups (based on stage, histology, tumor size, primary treatment, age, parametrium involvement, and lymphovascular space invasion). RESULTS: A total of 970 patients treated between January 1999 and December 2007 were included. The pretreatment LNM had prognostic significance in patients with stage IB1/IIA (HR for progression-free survival 2.10, p=0.001; HR for overall survival 1.99, p=0.005). However, the significance gradually decreased or disappeared with advancing stages. Similarly, the prognostic significance of the pretreatment LNM decreased with advancing disease status, including old age, parametrial involvement or lymphovascular space involvement. In contrast, the tumor size was associated with the prognostic significance of LNM with advancing status. The significance of the clinical LNM did not reflect the significance of the clinical stage. In contrast, the tumor size, parametrial involvement, and significance of the pathologic LNM reflected the clinical stage. CONCLUSION: In patients with cervical cancer, pretreatment LNM on imaging has different clinical significance depending on the tumor status. Korean Cancer Association 2020-04 2019-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7176965/ /pubmed/31671937 http://dx.doi.org/10.4143/crt.2019.328 Text en Copyright © 2020 by the Korean Cancer Association https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Jeong, Soo Young Park, Hyea Kim, Myeong Seon Kang, Jun Hyeok Paik, E Sun Lee, Yoo-Young Kim, Tae Joong Lee, Jeong Won Kim, Byoung-Gie Bae, Duk Soo Choi, Chel Hun Pretreatment Lymph Node Metastasis as a Prognostic Significance in Cervical Cancer: Comparison between Disease Status |
title | Pretreatment Lymph Node Metastasis as a Prognostic Significance in Cervical Cancer: Comparison between Disease Status |
title_full | Pretreatment Lymph Node Metastasis as a Prognostic Significance in Cervical Cancer: Comparison between Disease Status |
title_fullStr | Pretreatment Lymph Node Metastasis as a Prognostic Significance in Cervical Cancer: Comparison between Disease Status |
title_full_unstemmed | Pretreatment Lymph Node Metastasis as a Prognostic Significance in Cervical Cancer: Comparison between Disease Status |
title_short | Pretreatment Lymph Node Metastasis as a Prognostic Significance in Cervical Cancer: Comparison between Disease Status |
title_sort | pretreatment lymph node metastasis as a prognostic significance in cervical cancer: comparison between disease status |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7176965/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31671937 http://dx.doi.org/10.4143/crt.2019.328 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jeongsooyoung pretreatmentlymphnodemetastasisasaprognosticsignificanceincervicalcancercomparisonbetweendiseasestatus AT parkhyea pretreatmentlymphnodemetastasisasaprognosticsignificanceincervicalcancercomparisonbetweendiseasestatus AT kimmyeongseon pretreatmentlymphnodemetastasisasaprognosticsignificanceincervicalcancercomparisonbetweendiseasestatus AT kangjunhyeok pretreatmentlymphnodemetastasisasaprognosticsignificanceincervicalcancercomparisonbetweendiseasestatus AT paikesun pretreatmentlymphnodemetastasisasaprognosticsignificanceincervicalcancercomparisonbetweendiseasestatus AT leeyooyoung pretreatmentlymphnodemetastasisasaprognosticsignificanceincervicalcancercomparisonbetweendiseasestatus AT kimtaejoong pretreatmentlymphnodemetastasisasaprognosticsignificanceincervicalcancercomparisonbetweendiseasestatus AT leejeongwon pretreatmentlymphnodemetastasisasaprognosticsignificanceincervicalcancercomparisonbetweendiseasestatus AT kimbyounggie pretreatmentlymphnodemetastasisasaprognosticsignificanceincervicalcancercomparisonbetweendiseasestatus AT baeduksoo pretreatmentlymphnodemetastasisasaprognosticsignificanceincervicalcancercomparisonbetweendiseasestatus AT choichelhun pretreatmentlymphnodemetastasisasaprognosticsignificanceincervicalcancercomparisonbetweendiseasestatus |