Cargando…

Pretreatment Lymph Node Metastasis as a Prognostic Significance in Cervical Cancer: Comparison between Disease Status

PURPOSE: Lymph node metastasis (LNM) is the most significant prognostic factor in cervical cancer that was recently incorporated into the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system. This study was performed to evaluate whether the prognostic significance of LNM diffe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jeong, Soo Young, Park, Hyea, Kim, Myeong Seon, Kang, Jun Hyeok, Paik, E Sun, Lee, Yoo-Young, Kim, Tae Joong, Lee, Jeong Won, Kim, Byoung-Gie, Bae, Duk Soo, Choi, Chel Hun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Cancer Association 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7176965/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31671937
http://dx.doi.org/10.4143/crt.2019.328
_version_ 1783525114639286272
author Jeong, Soo Young
Park, Hyea
Kim, Myeong Seon
Kang, Jun Hyeok
Paik, E Sun
Lee, Yoo-Young
Kim, Tae Joong
Lee, Jeong Won
Kim, Byoung-Gie
Bae, Duk Soo
Choi, Chel Hun
author_facet Jeong, Soo Young
Park, Hyea
Kim, Myeong Seon
Kang, Jun Hyeok
Paik, E Sun
Lee, Yoo-Young
Kim, Tae Joong
Lee, Jeong Won
Kim, Byoung-Gie
Bae, Duk Soo
Choi, Chel Hun
author_sort Jeong, Soo Young
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Lymph node metastasis (LNM) is the most significant prognostic factor in cervical cancer that was recently incorporated into the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system. This study was performed to evaluate whether the prognostic significance of LNM differs according to disease status. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with FIGO stage IB or higher cervical cancer who had pretreatment computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging studies as well as long-term follow-up were enrolled in this retrospective study. The hazard ratio (HR) of Cox regression was used to determine the prognostic significance of LNM. The HRs were compared between the different tumor groups (based on stage, histology, tumor size, primary treatment, age, parametrium involvement, and lymphovascular space invasion). RESULTS: A total of 970 patients treated between January 1999 and December 2007 were included. The pretreatment LNM had prognostic significance in patients with stage IB1/IIA (HR for progression-free survival 2.10, p=0.001; HR for overall survival 1.99, p=0.005). However, the significance gradually decreased or disappeared with advancing stages. Similarly, the prognostic significance of the pretreatment LNM decreased with advancing disease status, including old age, parametrial involvement or lymphovascular space involvement. In contrast, the tumor size was associated with the prognostic significance of LNM with advancing status. The significance of the clinical LNM did not reflect the significance of the clinical stage. In contrast, the tumor size, parametrial involvement, and significance of the pathologic LNM reflected the clinical stage. CONCLUSION: In patients with cervical cancer, pretreatment LNM on imaging has different clinical significance depending on the tumor status.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7176965
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Korean Cancer Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71769652020-04-27 Pretreatment Lymph Node Metastasis as a Prognostic Significance in Cervical Cancer: Comparison between Disease Status Jeong, Soo Young Park, Hyea Kim, Myeong Seon Kang, Jun Hyeok Paik, E Sun Lee, Yoo-Young Kim, Tae Joong Lee, Jeong Won Kim, Byoung-Gie Bae, Duk Soo Choi, Chel Hun Cancer Res Treat Original Article PURPOSE: Lymph node metastasis (LNM) is the most significant prognostic factor in cervical cancer that was recently incorporated into the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system. This study was performed to evaluate whether the prognostic significance of LNM differs according to disease status. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with FIGO stage IB or higher cervical cancer who had pretreatment computed tomography and/or magnetic resonance imaging studies as well as long-term follow-up were enrolled in this retrospective study. The hazard ratio (HR) of Cox regression was used to determine the prognostic significance of LNM. The HRs were compared between the different tumor groups (based on stage, histology, tumor size, primary treatment, age, parametrium involvement, and lymphovascular space invasion). RESULTS: A total of 970 patients treated between January 1999 and December 2007 were included. The pretreatment LNM had prognostic significance in patients with stage IB1/IIA (HR for progression-free survival 2.10, p=0.001; HR for overall survival 1.99, p=0.005). However, the significance gradually decreased or disappeared with advancing stages. Similarly, the prognostic significance of the pretreatment LNM decreased with advancing disease status, including old age, parametrial involvement or lymphovascular space involvement. In contrast, the tumor size was associated with the prognostic significance of LNM with advancing status. The significance of the clinical LNM did not reflect the significance of the clinical stage. In contrast, the tumor size, parametrial involvement, and significance of the pathologic LNM reflected the clinical stage. CONCLUSION: In patients with cervical cancer, pretreatment LNM on imaging has different clinical significance depending on the tumor status. Korean Cancer Association 2020-04 2019-10-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7176965/ /pubmed/31671937 http://dx.doi.org/10.4143/crt.2019.328 Text en Copyright © 2020 by the Korean Cancer Association https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) ) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Jeong, Soo Young
Park, Hyea
Kim, Myeong Seon
Kang, Jun Hyeok
Paik, E Sun
Lee, Yoo-Young
Kim, Tae Joong
Lee, Jeong Won
Kim, Byoung-Gie
Bae, Duk Soo
Choi, Chel Hun
Pretreatment Lymph Node Metastasis as a Prognostic Significance in Cervical Cancer: Comparison between Disease Status
title Pretreatment Lymph Node Metastasis as a Prognostic Significance in Cervical Cancer: Comparison between Disease Status
title_full Pretreatment Lymph Node Metastasis as a Prognostic Significance in Cervical Cancer: Comparison between Disease Status
title_fullStr Pretreatment Lymph Node Metastasis as a Prognostic Significance in Cervical Cancer: Comparison between Disease Status
title_full_unstemmed Pretreatment Lymph Node Metastasis as a Prognostic Significance in Cervical Cancer: Comparison between Disease Status
title_short Pretreatment Lymph Node Metastasis as a Prognostic Significance in Cervical Cancer: Comparison between Disease Status
title_sort pretreatment lymph node metastasis as a prognostic significance in cervical cancer: comparison between disease status
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7176965/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31671937
http://dx.doi.org/10.4143/crt.2019.328
work_keys_str_mv AT jeongsooyoung pretreatmentlymphnodemetastasisasaprognosticsignificanceincervicalcancercomparisonbetweendiseasestatus
AT parkhyea pretreatmentlymphnodemetastasisasaprognosticsignificanceincervicalcancercomparisonbetweendiseasestatus
AT kimmyeongseon pretreatmentlymphnodemetastasisasaprognosticsignificanceincervicalcancercomparisonbetweendiseasestatus
AT kangjunhyeok pretreatmentlymphnodemetastasisasaprognosticsignificanceincervicalcancercomparisonbetweendiseasestatus
AT paikesun pretreatmentlymphnodemetastasisasaprognosticsignificanceincervicalcancercomparisonbetweendiseasestatus
AT leeyooyoung pretreatmentlymphnodemetastasisasaprognosticsignificanceincervicalcancercomparisonbetweendiseasestatus
AT kimtaejoong pretreatmentlymphnodemetastasisasaprognosticsignificanceincervicalcancercomparisonbetweendiseasestatus
AT leejeongwon pretreatmentlymphnodemetastasisasaprognosticsignificanceincervicalcancercomparisonbetweendiseasestatus
AT kimbyounggie pretreatmentlymphnodemetastasisasaprognosticsignificanceincervicalcancercomparisonbetweendiseasestatus
AT baeduksoo pretreatmentlymphnodemetastasisasaprognosticsignificanceincervicalcancercomparisonbetweendiseasestatus
AT choichelhun pretreatmentlymphnodemetastasisasaprognosticsignificanceincervicalcancercomparisonbetweendiseasestatus