Cargando…
Job Insecurity and Subsequent Actual Turnover: Rumination as a Valid Explanation?
Job insecurity is a work stressor with many negative consequences for the individual as well as the organization. However, currently, little is known about why job insecurity is related to these outcomes. In the present study, actual turnover was investigated as a possible consequence of job insecur...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7177002/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32373033 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00712 |
_version_ | 1783525123026845696 |
---|---|
author | Richter, Anne Vander Elst, Tinne De Witte, Hans |
author_facet | Richter, Anne Vander Elst, Tinne De Witte, Hans |
author_sort | Richter, Anne |
collection | PubMed |
description | Job insecurity is a work stressor with many negative consequences for the individual as well as the organization. However, currently, little is known about why job insecurity is related to these outcomes. In the present study, actual turnover was investigated as a possible consequence of job insecurity. Additionally, rumination about a possible job loss (i.e., the act of intensified thinking about the future of the job) was investigated as an explanatory mechanism. Relationships were tested using longitudinal data from a sample of 699 Belgian employees. Results of structural equation modeling analyses show that job insecurity was related to turnover 1 year later. This relationship was mediated by rumination about job insecurity. Actual turnover was investigated over time as a potential consequence of job insecurity, compared to many studies that used turnover intention as a proxy to predict actual turnover. Moreover, a job insecurity-specific mechanism—namely, rumination about job insecurity—was studied, which increased our understanding of how job insecurity develops into its consequences. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7177002 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71770022020-05-05 Job Insecurity and Subsequent Actual Turnover: Rumination as a Valid Explanation? Richter, Anne Vander Elst, Tinne De Witte, Hans Front Psychol Psychology Job insecurity is a work stressor with many negative consequences for the individual as well as the organization. However, currently, little is known about why job insecurity is related to these outcomes. In the present study, actual turnover was investigated as a possible consequence of job insecurity. Additionally, rumination about a possible job loss (i.e., the act of intensified thinking about the future of the job) was investigated as an explanatory mechanism. Relationships were tested using longitudinal data from a sample of 699 Belgian employees. Results of structural equation modeling analyses show that job insecurity was related to turnover 1 year later. This relationship was mediated by rumination about job insecurity. Actual turnover was investigated over time as a potential consequence of job insecurity, compared to many studies that used turnover intention as a proxy to predict actual turnover. Moreover, a job insecurity-specific mechanism—namely, rumination about job insecurity—was studied, which increased our understanding of how job insecurity develops into its consequences. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7177002/ /pubmed/32373033 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00712 Text en Copyright © 2020 Richter, Vander Elst and De Witte. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Richter, Anne Vander Elst, Tinne De Witte, Hans Job Insecurity and Subsequent Actual Turnover: Rumination as a Valid Explanation? |
title | Job Insecurity and Subsequent Actual Turnover: Rumination as a Valid Explanation? |
title_full | Job Insecurity and Subsequent Actual Turnover: Rumination as a Valid Explanation? |
title_fullStr | Job Insecurity and Subsequent Actual Turnover: Rumination as a Valid Explanation? |
title_full_unstemmed | Job Insecurity and Subsequent Actual Turnover: Rumination as a Valid Explanation? |
title_short | Job Insecurity and Subsequent Actual Turnover: Rumination as a Valid Explanation? |
title_sort | job insecurity and subsequent actual turnover: rumination as a valid explanation? |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7177002/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32373033 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00712 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT richteranne jobinsecurityandsubsequentactualturnoverruminationasavalidexplanation AT vanderelsttinne jobinsecurityandsubsequentactualturnoverruminationasavalidexplanation AT dewittehans jobinsecurityandsubsequentactualturnoverruminationasavalidexplanation |