Cargando…
Measuring Efficiency of Semi-automated Brain Tumor Segmentation by Simulating User Interaction
Traditionally, radiologists have crudely quantified tumor extent by measuring the longest and shortest dimension by dragging a cursor between opposite boundary points across a single image rather than full segmentation of the volumetric extent. For algorithmic-based volumetric segmentation, the degr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7177174/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32372938 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2020.00032 |
_version_ | 1783525163003805696 |
---|---|
author | Gering, David Kotrotsou, Aikaterini Young-Moxon, Brett Miller, Neal Avery, Aaron Kohli, Lisa Knapp, Haley Hoffman, Jeffrey Chylla, Roger Peitzman, Linda Mackie, Thomas R. |
author_facet | Gering, David Kotrotsou, Aikaterini Young-Moxon, Brett Miller, Neal Avery, Aaron Kohli, Lisa Knapp, Haley Hoffman, Jeffrey Chylla, Roger Peitzman, Linda Mackie, Thomas R. |
author_sort | Gering, David |
collection | PubMed |
description | Traditionally, radiologists have crudely quantified tumor extent by measuring the longest and shortest dimension by dragging a cursor between opposite boundary points across a single image rather than full segmentation of the volumetric extent. For algorithmic-based volumetric segmentation, the degree of radiologist experiential involvement varies from confirming a fully automated segmentation, to making a single drag on an image to initiate semi-automated segmentation, to making multiple drags and clicks on multiple images during interactive segmentation. An experiment was designed to test an algorithm that allows various levels of interaction. Given the ground-truth of the BraTS training data, which delimits the brain tumors of 285 patients on multi-spectral MR, a computer simulation mimicked the process that a radiologist would follow to perform segmentation with real-time interaction. Clicks and drags were placed only where needed in response to the deviation between real-time segmentation results and assumed radiologist's goal, as provided by the ground-truth. Results of accuracy for various levels of interaction are presented along with estimated elapsed time, in order to measure efficiency. Average total elapsed time, including loading the study through confirming 3D contours, was 46 s. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7177174 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71771742020-05-05 Measuring Efficiency of Semi-automated Brain Tumor Segmentation by Simulating User Interaction Gering, David Kotrotsou, Aikaterini Young-Moxon, Brett Miller, Neal Avery, Aaron Kohli, Lisa Knapp, Haley Hoffman, Jeffrey Chylla, Roger Peitzman, Linda Mackie, Thomas R. Front Comput Neurosci Neuroscience Traditionally, radiologists have crudely quantified tumor extent by measuring the longest and shortest dimension by dragging a cursor between opposite boundary points across a single image rather than full segmentation of the volumetric extent. For algorithmic-based volumetric segmentation, the degree of radiologist experiential involvement varies from confirming a fully automated segmentation, to making a single drag on an image to initiate semi-automated segmentation, to making multiple drags and clicks on multiple images during interactive segmentation. An experiment was designed to test an algorithm that allows various levels of interaction. Given the ground-truth of the BraTS training data, which delimits the brain tumors of 285 patients on multi-spectral MR, a computer simulation mimicked the process that a radiologist would follow to perform segmentation with real-time interaction. Clicks and drags were placed only where needed in response to the deviation between real-time segmentation results and assumed radiologist's goal, as provided by the ground-truth. Results of accuracy for various levels of interaction are presented along with estimated elapsed time, in order to measure efficiency. Average total elapsed time, including loading the study through confirming 3D contours, was 46 s. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7177174/ /pubmed/32372938 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2020.00032 Text en Copyright © 2020 Gering, Kotrotsou, Young-Moxon, Miller, Avery, Kohli, Knapp, Hoffman, Chylla, Peitzman and Mackie. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Neuroscience Gering, David Kotrotsou, Aikaterini Young-Moxon, Brett Miller, Neal Avery, Aaron Kohli, Lisa Knapp, Haley Hoffman, Jeffrey Chylla, Roger Peitzman, Linda Mackie, Thomas R. Measuring Efficiency of Semi-automated Brain Tumor Segmentation by Simulating User Interaction |
title | Measuring Efficiency of Semi-automated Brain Tumor Segmentation by Simulating User Interaction |
title_full | Measuring Efficiency of Semi-automated Brain Tumor Segmentation by Simulating User Interaction |
title_fullStr | Measuring Efficiency of Semi-automated Brain Tumor Segmentation by Simulating User Interaction |
title_full_unstemmed | Measuring Efficiency of Semi-automated Brain Tumor Segmentation by Simulating User Interaction |
title_short | Measuring Efficiency of Semi-automated Brain Tumor Segmentation by Simulating User Interaction |
title_sort | measuring efficiency of semi-automated brain tumor segmentation by simulating user interaction |
topic | Neuroscience |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7177174/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32372938 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fncom.2020.00032 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT geringdavid measuringefficiencyofsemiautomatedbraintumorsegmentationbysimulatinguserinteraction AT kotrotsouaikaterini measuringefficiencyofsemiautomatedbraintumorsegmentationbysimulatinguserinteraction AT youngmoxonbrett measuringefficiencyofsemiautomatedbraintumorsegmentationbysimulatinguserinteraction AT millerneal measuringefficiencyofsemiautomatedbraintumorsegmentationbysimulatinguserinteraction AT averyaaron measuringefficiencyofsemiautomatedbraintumorsegmentationbysimulatinguserinteraction AT kohlilisa measuringefficiencyofsemiautomatedbraintumorsegmentationbysimulatinguserinteraction AT knapphaley measuringefficiencyofsemiautomatedbraintumorsegmentationbysimulatinguserinteraction AT hoffmanjeffrey measuringefficiencyofsemiautomatedbraintumorsegmentationbysimulatinguserinteraction AT chyllaroger measuringefficiencyofsemiautomatedbraintumorsegmentationbysimulatinguserinteraction AT peitzmanlinda measuringefficiencyofsemiautomatedbraintumorsegmentationbysimulatinguserinteraction AT mackiethomasr measuringefficiencyofsemiautomatedbraintumorsegmentationbysimulatinguserinteraction |