Cargando…

Causative factors of discomfort in esophagogastroduodenoscopy: A large-scale cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND: It is important to reduce patient discomfort in esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Remedial measures can be taken to alleviate discomfort if the causative factors are determined; however, all the factors have not been elucidated yet. AIM: To clearly determine the factors influencing discomfort...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Majima, Kenichiro, Shimamoto, Takeshi, Muraki, Yosuke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7177206/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32341749
http://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v12.i4.128
_version_ 1783525167559868416
author Majima, Kenichiro
Shimamoto, Takeshi
Muraki, Yosuke
author_facet Majima, Kenichiro
Shimamoto, Takeshi
Muraki, Yosuke
author_sort Majima, Kenichiro
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: It is important to reduce patient discomfort in esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Remedial measures can be taken to alleviate discomfort if the causative factors are determined; however, all the factors have not been elucidated yet. AIM: To clearly determine the factors influencing discomfort in transoral esophagogastroduodenoscopy using a large-size cross-sectional study with readily available data. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent screening transoral esophagogastroduodenoscopy consecutively between August 2017 and October 2017 at a health check-up center were included. Discomfort was evaluated using a face scale between 0 and 10 with a 6-level questionnaire. Univariate and multiple regression analyses were performed to investigate the factors related to the discomfort in esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Univariate analysis was performed in both the unsedated and sedated study groups. Age, sex, height, body mass index, smoking status, alcohol intake, hiatal hernia, history of gastrectomy, biopsy during examination, Lugol’s solution usage, administration of butylscopolamine with/without a sedative (pethidine, midazolam, or both), endoscope model, history of endoscopy, and endoscopists were considered as possible factors of discomfort. RESULTS: Finally, 1715 patients were enrolled in this study. Overall, the median discomfort score was 2 and the interquartile range was 2-4. High discomfort (score ≥ 6) was recorded in 18% of the participants. According to univariate analysis, in the unsedated group, young age (P < 0.001), female sex (P < 0.001), and no history of endoscopy (P < 0.001) were factors associated with increased discomfort. Significant differences were also noted for height (P = 0.007), smoking status (P = 0.003), and endoscopists (P < 0.001). In the sedation group, young age (P < 0.001), female sex (P < 0.001), and no history of endoscopy (P = 0.004) were associated with increased discomfort; additionally, significant differences were found in smoking status (P < 0.001), type of sedation (P < 0.001), and endoscopists (P = 0.027). There was also a marginal difference due to alcohol intake (P = 0.055). Based on multiple regression analysis, young age, female sex, less height, current smoking status, and presence of hiatal hernia [regression coefficients of 0.08, P < 0.001 (for -1 years); 0.45, P = 0.013; 0.02, P = 0.024 (for -1 cm); 0.35, P = 0.036; and 0.34, P = 0.003, respectively] were factors that significantly increased discomfort in esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Alternatively, sedation significantly reduced discomfort and pethidine (regression coefficient: -1.47, P < 0.001) and midazolam (regression coefficient: -1.63, P = 0.001) significantly reduced the discomfort both individually and in combination (regression coefficient: -2.92, P < 0.001). A difference in the endoscopist performing the procedure was also associated with discomfort. CONCLUSION: Young age, female sex, and smoking are associated with esophagogastroduodenoscopy discomfort. Additionally, heavy alcohol consumption diminished the effects of sedation. These factors are easily obtained and are thus useful.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7177206
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71772062020-04-27 Causative factors of discomfort in esophagogastroduodenoscopy: A large-scale cross-sectional study Majima, Kenichiro Shimamoto, Takeshi Muraki, Yosuke World J Gastrointest Endosc Observational Study BACKGROUND: It is important to reduce patient discomfort in esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Remedial measures can be taken to alleviate discomfort if the causative factors are determined; however, all the factors have not been elucidated yet. AIM: To clearly determine the factors influencing discomfort in transoral esophagogastroduodenoscopy using a large-size cross-sectional study with readily available data. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent screening transoral esophagogastroduodenoscopy consecutively between August 2017 and October 2017 at a health check-up center were included. Discomfort was evaluated using a face scale between 0 and 10 with a 6-level questionnaire. Univariate and multiple regression analyses were performed to investigate the factors related to the discomfort in esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Univariate analysis was performed in both the unsedated and sedated study groups. Age, sex, height, body mass index, smoking status, alcohol intake, hiatal hernia, history of gastrectomy, biopsy during examination, Lugol’s solution usage, administration of butylscopolamine with/without a sedative (pethidine, midazolam, or both), endoscope model, history of endoscopy, and endoscopists were considered as possible factors of discomfort. RESULTS: Finally, 1715 patients were enrolled in this study. Overall, the median discomfort score was 2 and the interquartile range was 2-4. High discomfort (score ≥ 6) was recorded in 18% of the participants. According to univariate analysis, in the unsedated group, young age (P < 0.001), female sex (P < 0.001), and no history of endoscopy (P < 0.001) were factors associated with increased discomfort. Significant differences were also noted for height (P = 0.007), smoking status (P = 0.003), and endoscopists (P < 0.001). In the sedation group, young age (P < 0.001), female sex (P < 0.001), and no history of endoscopy (P = 0.004) were associated with increased discomfort; additionally, significant differences were found in smoking status (P < 0.001), type of sedation (P < 0.001), and endoscopists (P = 0.027). There was also a marginal difference due to alcohol intake (P = 0.055). Based on multiple regression analysis, young age, female sex, less height, current smoking status, and presence of hiatal hernia [regression coefficients of 0.08, P < 0.001 (for -1 years); 0.45, P = 0.013; 0.02, P = 0.024 (for -1 cm); 0.35, P = 0.036; and 0.34, P = 0.003, respectively] were factors that significantly increased discomfort in esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Alternatively, sedation significantly reduced discomfort and pethidine (regression coefficient: -1.47, P < 0.001) and midazolam (regression coefficient: -1.63, P = 0.001) significantly reduced the discomfort both individually and in combination (regression coefficient: -2.92, P < 0.001). A difference in the endoscopist performing the procedure was also associated with discomfort. CONCLUSION: Young age, female sex, and smoking are associated with esophagogastroduodenoscopy discomfort. Additionally, heavy alcohol consumption diminished the effects of sedation. These factors are easily obtained and are thus useful. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2020-04-16 2020-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7177206/ /pubmed/32341749 http://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v12.i4.128 Text en ©The Author(s) 2020. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.
spellingShingle Observational Study
Majima, Kenichiro
Shimamoto, Takeshi
Muraki, Yosuke
Causative factors of discomfort in esophagogastroduodenoscopy: A large-scale cross-sectional study
title Causative factors of discomfort in esophagogastroduodenoscopy: A large-scale cross-sectional study
title_full Causative factors of discomfort in esophagogastroduodenoscopy: A large-scale cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Causative factors of discomfort in esophagogastroduodenoscopy: A large-scale cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Causative factors of discomfort in esophagogastroduodenoscopy: A large-scale cross-sectional study
title_short Causative factors of discomfort in esophagogastroduodenoscopy: A large-scale cross-sectional study
title_sort causative factors of discomfort in esophagogastroduodenoscopy: a large-scale cross-sectional study
topic Observational Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7177206/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32341749
http://dx.doi.org/10.4253/wjge.v12.i4.128
work_keys_str_mv AT majimakenichiro causativefactorsofdiscomfortinesophagogastroduodenoscopyalargescalecrosssectionalstudy
AT shimamototakeshi causativefactorsofdiscomfortinesophagogastroduodenoscopyalargescalecrosssectionalstudy
AT murakiyosuke causativefactorsofdiscomfortinesophagogastroduodenoscopyalargescalecrosssectionalstudy