Cargando…

Effectiveness of Mobile Applications Running on Smartphones to Promote Physical Activity: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis

Mobile applications reach a high number of individuals at low costs. This systematic review investigated the effectiveness of mobile application-based interventions to increase physical activity (PA) and self-efficacy and to decrease sedentarism. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Silva, Anabela G., Simões, Patrícia, Queirós, Alexandra, P Rocha, Nelson, Rodrigues, Mário
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7177448/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32230769
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17072251
_version_ 1783525222591234048
author Silva, Anabela G.
Simões, Patrícia
Queirós, Alexandra
P Rocha, Nelson
Rodrigues, Mário
author_facet Silva, Anabela G.
Simões, Patrícia
Queirós, Alexandra
P Rocha, Nelson
Rodrigues, Mário
author_sort Silva, Anabela G.
collection PubMed
description Mobile applications reach a high number of individuals at low costs. This systematic review investigated the effectiveness of mobile application-based interventions to increase physical activity (PA) and self-efficacy and to decrease sedentarism. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs investigating the effect of PA interventions using an app compared to no intervention or traditional interventions were included. Pooled effects using the standardized mean difference (SMD) or the weighted mean difference (WMD) were calculated and the overall quality of the evidence was rated using the GRADE. Eleven studies were included. In the short term, pooled estimates showed a small and positive effect in the number of steps favoring interventions using a mobile app when compared with no interventions (WMD = 1579.04, 95%CI 454.04 to 2703.38) and with traditional interventions (WMD = 665.96, 95%CI 167.92 to 1164.00). For self-efficacy and at follow-up, results favoured traditional interventions (WMD = −8.20, 95%CI −14.25 to −2.15). Non-significant results were found for the remaining comparisons. The quality of the evidence ranged from very low to low. There is very low to low quality evidence that interventions using mobile apps running on smartphones, when combined with traditional interventions, are superior to traditional interventions in the short term. Further high-quality studies are required.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7177448
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71774482020-04-28 Effectiveness of Mobile Applications Running on Smartphones to Promote Physical Activity: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis Silva, Anabela G. Simões, Patrícia Queirós, Alexandra P Rocha, Nelson Rodrigues, Mário Int J Environ Res Public Health Review Mobile applications reach a high number of individuals at low costs. This systematic review investigated the effectiveness of mobile application-based interventions to increase physical activity (PA) and self-efficacy and to decrease sedentarism. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs investigating the effect of PA interventions using an app compared to no intervention or traditional interventions were included. Pooled effects using the standardized mean difference (SMD) or the weighted mean difference (WMD) were calculated and the overall quality of the evidence was rated using the GRADE. Eleven studies were included. In the short term, pooled estimates showed a small and positive effect in the number of steps favoring interventions using a mobile app when compared with no interventions (WMD = 1579.04, 95%CI 454.04 to 2703.38) and with traditional interventions (WMD = 665.96, 95%CI 167.92 to 1164.00). For self-efficacy and at follow-up, results favoured traditional interventions (WMD = −8.20, 95%CI −14.25 to −2.15). Non-significant results were found for the remaining comparisons. The quality of the evidence ranged from very low to low. There is very low to low quality evidence that interventions using mobile apps running on smartphones, when combined with traditional interventions, are superior to traditional interventions in the short term. Further high-quality studies are required. MDPI 2020-03-27 2020-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7177448/ /pubmed/32230769 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17072251 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Silva, Anabela G.
Simões, Patrícia
Queirós, Alexandra
P Rocha, Nelson
Rodrigues, Mário
Effectiveness of Mobile Applications Running on Smartphones to Promote Physical Activity: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
title Effectiveness of Mobile Applications Running on Smartphones to Promote Physical Activity: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
title_full Effectiveness of Mobile Applications Running on Smartphones to Promote Physical Activity: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Effectiveness of Mobile Applications Running on Smartphones to Promote Physical Activity: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of Mobile Applications Running on Smartphones to Promote Physical Activity: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
title_short Effectiveness of Mobile Applications Running on Smartphones to Promote Physical Activity: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
title_sort effectiveness of mobile applications running on smartphones to promote physical activity: a systematic review with meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7177448/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32230769
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17072251
work_keys_str_mv AT silvaanabelag effectivenessofmobileapplicationsrunningonsmartphonestopromotephysicalactivityasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT simoespatricia effectivenessofmobileapplicationsrunningonsmartphonestopromotephysicalactivityasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT queirosalexandra effectivenessofmobileapplicationsrunningonsmartphonestopromotephysicalactivityasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT prochanelson effectivenessofmobileapplicationsrunningonsmartphonestopromotephysicalactivityasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis
AT rodriguesmario effectivenessofmobileapplicationsrunningonsmartphonestopromotephysicalactivityasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis