Cargando…
Effectiveness of Mobile Applications Running on Smartphones to Promote Physical Activity: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis
Mobile applications reach a high number of individuals at low costs. This systematic review investigated the effectiveness of mobile application-based interventions to increase physical activity (PA) and self-efficacy and to decrease sedentarism. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs in...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7177448/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32230769 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17072251 |
_version_ | 1783525222591234048 |
---|---|
author | Silva, Anabela G. Simões, Patrícia Queirós, Alexandra P Rocha, Nelson Rodrigues, Mário |
author_facet | Silva, Anabela G. Simões, Patrícia Queirós, Alexandra P Rocha, Nelson Rodrigues, Mário |
author_sort | Silva, Anabela G. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Mobile applications reach a high number of individuals at low costs. This systematic review investigated the effectiveness of mobile application-based interventions to increase physical activity (PA) and self-efficacy and to decrease sedentarism. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs investigating the effect of PA interventions using an app compared to no intervention or traditional interventions were included. Pooled effects using the standardized mean difference (SMD) or the weighted mean difference (WMD) were calculated and the overall quality of the evidence was rated using the GRADE. Eleven studies were included. In the short term, pooled estimates showed a small and positive effect in the number of steps favoring interventions using a mobile app when compared with no interventions (WMD = 1579.04, 95%CI 454.04 to 2703.38) and with traditional interventions (WMD = 665.96, 95%CI 167.92 to 1164.00). For self-efficacy and at follow-up, results favoured traditional interventions (WMD = −8.20, 95%CI −14.25 to −2.15). Non-significant results were found for the remaining comparisons. The quality of the evidence ranged from very low to low. There is very low to low quality evidence that interventions using mobile apps running on smartphones, when combined with traditional interventions, are superior to traditional interventions in the short term. Further high-quality studies are required. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7177448 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71774482020-04-28 Effectiveness of Mobile Applications Running on Smartphones to Promote Physical Activity: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis Silva, Anabela G. Simões, Patrícia Queirós, Alexandra P Rocha, Nelson Rodrigues, Mário Int J Environ Res Public Health Review Mobile applications reach a high number of individuals at low costs. This systematic review investigated the effectiveness of mobile application-based interventions to increase physical activity (PA) and self-efficacy and to decrease sedentarism. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs investigating the effect of PA interventions using an app compared to no intervention or traditional interventions were included. Pooled effects using the standardized mean difference (SMD) or the weighted mean difference (WMD) were calculated and the overall quality of the evidence was rated using the GRADE. Eleven studies were included. In the short term, pooled estimates showed a small and positive effect in the number of steps favoring interventions using a mobile app when compared with no interventions (WMD = 1579.04, 95%CI 454.04 to 2703.38) and with traditional interventions (WMD = 665.96, 95%CI 167.92 to 1164.00). For self-efficacy and at follow-up, results favoured traditional interventions (WMD = −8.20, 95%CI −14.25 to −2.15). Non-significant results were found for the remaining comparisons. The quality of the evidence ranged from very low to low. There is very low to low quality evidence that interventions using mobile apps running on smartphones, when combined with traditional interventions, are superior to traditional interventions in the short term. Further high-quality studies are required. MDPI 2020-03-27 2020-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7177448/ /pubmed/32230769 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17072251 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Silva, Anabela G. Simões, Patrícia Queirós, Alexandra P Rocha, Nelson Rodrigues, Mário Effectiveness of Mobile Applications Running on Smartphones to Promote Physical Activity: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis |
title | Effectiveness of Mobile Applications Running on Smartphones to Promote Physical Activity: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Effectiveness of Mobile Applications Running on Smartphones to Promote Physical Activity: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Effectiveness of Mobile Applications Running on Smartphones to Promote Physical Activity: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Effectiveness of Mobile Applications Running on Smartphones to Promote Physical Activity: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Effectiveness of Mobile Applications Running on Smartphones to Promote Physical Activity: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | effectiveness of mobile applications running on smartphones to promote physical activity: a systematic review with meta-analysis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7177448/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32230769 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17072251 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT silvaanabelag effectivenessofmobileapplicationsrunningonsmartphonestopromotephysicalactivityasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis AT simoespatricia effectivenessofmobileapplicationsrunningonsmartphonestopromotephysicalactivityasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis AT queirosalexandra effectivenessofmobileapplicationsrunningonsmartphonestopromotephysicalactivityasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis AT prochanelson effectivenessofmobileapplicationsrunningonsmartphonestopromotephysicalactivityasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis AT rodriguesmario effectivenessofmobileapplicationsrunningonsmartphonestopromotephysicalactivityasystematicreviewwithmetaanalysis |