Cargando…

Evaluation of penicillin G susceptibility testing methods for Staphylococcus lugdunensis

BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus lugdunensis belongs to the CoNS group, but is regarded to be more virulent than most other CoNS. It is also remarkably susceptible to antibiotics, including penicillin G. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate different methods for penicillin susceptibility testing, to assess penicillin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hagstrand Aldman, Malin, Påhlman, Lisa I
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7177478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32016343
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkaa004
_version_ 1783525229093453824
author Hagstrand Aldman, Malin
Påhlman, Lisa I
author_facet Hagstrand Aldman, Malin
Påhlman, Lisa I
author_sort Hagstrand Aldman, Malin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus lugdunensis belongs to the CoNS group, but is regarded to be more virulent than most other CoNS. It is also remarkably susceptible to antibiotics, including penicillin G. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate different methods for penicillin susceptibility testing, to assess penicillin susceptibility rates among S. lugdunensis and to describe the clinical presentation including antibiotic treatment. METHODS: Clinical isolates of S. lugdunensis were tested for penicillin susceptibility using disc diffusion according to CLSI (10 U disc) and EUCAST (1 U disc), assessment of zone-edge appearance, nitrocefin test and Etest for MIC determination. PCR of the blaZ gene was used as a reference method. RESULTS: Of the 112 isolates included in the study, 67% were susceptible to penicillin G according to blaZ PCR. The EUCAST disc diffusion test had 100% sensitivity, whereas the CLSI method had one very major error with a false-susceptible isolate. When zone-edge appearance was included in the assessment, the false-susceptible isolate was correctly classified as resistant. Foreign-body infection was the most common focus of infection, affecting 49% of the participants. Only 4% of the patients were treated with penicillin G. CONCLUSIONS: Penicillin susceptibility is common in S. lugdunensis and the disc diffusion method according to EUCAST had a higher sensitivity than that of CLSI. Assessment of zone-edge appearance could increase the sensitivity of the disc diffusion test. Penicillin susceptibility testing and treatment should be considered in S. lugdunensis infections.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7177478
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71774782020-04-28 Evaluation of penicillin G susceptibility testing methods for Staphylococcus lugdunensis Hagstrand Aldman, Malin Påhlman, Lisa I J Antimicrob Chemother Original Research BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus lugdunensis belongs to the CoNS group, but is regarded to be more virulent than most other CoNS. It is also remarkably susceptible to antibiotics, including penicillin G. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate different methods for penicillin susceptibility testing, to assess penicillin susceptibility rates among S. lugdunensis and to describe the clinical presentation including antibiotic treatment. METHODS: Clinical isolates of S. lugdunensis were tested for penicillin susceptibility using disc diffusion according to CLSI (10 U disc) and EUCAST (1 U disc), assessment of zone-edge appearance, nitrocefin test and Etest for MIC determination. PCR of the blaZ gene was used as a reference method. RESULTS: Of the 112 isolates included in the study, 67% were susceptible to penicillin G according to blaZ PCR. The EUCAST disc diffusion test had 100% sensitivity, whereas the CLSI method had one very major error with a false-susceptible isolate. When zone-edge appearance was included in the assessment, the false-susceptible isolate was correctly classified as resistant. Foreign-body infection was the most common focus of infection, affecting 49% of the participants. Only 4% of the patients were treated with penicillin G. CONCLUSIONS: Penicillin susceptibility is common in S. lugdunensis and the disc diffusion method according to EUCAST had a higher sensitivity than that of CLSI. Assessment of zone-edge appearance could increase the sensitivity of the disc diffusion test. Penicillin susceptibility testing and treatment should be considered in S. lugdunensis infections. Oxford University Press 2020-05 2020-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7177478/ /pubmed/32016343 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkaa004 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Research
Hagstrand Aldman, Malin
Påhlman, Lisa I
Evaluation of penicillin G susceptibility testing methods for Staphylococcus lugdunensis
title Evaluation of penicillin G susceptibility testing methods for Staphylococcus lugdunensis
title_full Evaluation of penicillin G susceptibility testing methods for Staphylococcus lugdunensis
title_fullStr Evaluation of penicillin G susceptibility testing methods for Staphylococcus lugdunensis
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of penicillin G susceptibility testing methods for Staphylococcus lugdunensis
title_short Evaluation of penicillin G susceptibility testing methods for Staphylococcus lugdunensis
title_sort evaluation of penicillin g susceptibility testing methods for staphylococcus lugdunensis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7177478/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32016343
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkaa004
work_keys_str_mv AT hagstrandaldmanmalin evaluationofpenicillingsusceptibilitytestingmethodsforstaphylococcuslugdunensis
AT pahlmanlisai evaluationofpenicillingsusceptibilitytestingmethodsforstaphylococcuslugdunensis