Cargando…
Evaluation of penicillin G susceptibility testing methods for Staphylococcus lugdunensis
BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus lugdunensis belongs to the CoNS group, but is regarded to be more virulent than most other CoNS. It is also remarkably susceptible to antibiotics, including penicillin G. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate different methods for penicillin susceptibility testing, to assess penicillin...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7177478/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32016343 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkaa004 |
_version_ | 1783525229093453824 |
---|---|
author | Hagstrand Aldman, Malin Påhlman, Lisa I |
author_facet | Hagstrand Aldman, Malin Påhlman, Lisa I |
author_sort | Hagstrand Aldman, Malin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus lugdunensis belongs to the CoNS group, but is regarded to be more virulent than most other CoNS. It is also remarkably susceptible to antibiotics, including penicillin G. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate different methods for penicillin susceptibility testing, to assess penicillin susceptibility rates among S. lugdunensis and to describe the clinical presentation including antibiotic treatment. METHODS: Clinical isolates of S. lugdunensis were tested for penicillin susceptibility using disc diffusion according to CLSI (10 U disc) and EUCAST (1 U disc), assessment of zone-edge appearance, nitrocefin test and Etest for MIC determination. PCR of the blaZ gene was used as a reference method. RESULTS: Of the 112 isolates included in the study, 67% were susceptible to penicillin G according to blaZ PCR. The EUCAST disc diffusion test had 100% sensitivity, whereas the CLSI method had one very major error with a false-susceptible isolate. When zone-edge appearance was included in the assessment, the false-susceptible isolate was correctly classified as resistant. Foreign-body infection was the most common focus of infection, affecting 49% of the participants. Only 4% of the patients were treated with penicillin G. CONCLUSIONS: Penicillin susceptibility is common in S. lugdunensis and the disc diffusion method according to EUCAST had a higher sensitivity than that of CLSI. Assessment of zone-edge appearance could increase the sensitivity of the disc diffusion test. Penicillin susceptibility testing and treatment should be considered in S. lugdunensis infections. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7177478 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71774782020-04-28 Evaluation of penicillin G susceptibility testing methods for Staphylococcus lugdunensis Hagstrand Aldman, Malin Påhlman, Lisa I J Antimicrob Chemother Original Research BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus lugdunensis belongs to the CoNS group, but is regarded to be more virulent than most other CoNS. It is also remarkably susceptible to antibiotics, including penicillin G. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate different methods for penicillin susceptibility testing, to assess penicillin susceptibility rates among S. lugdunensis and to describe the clinical presentation including antibiotic treatment. METHODS: Clinical isolates of S. lugdunensis were tested for penicillin susceptibility using disc diffusion according to CLSI (10 U disc) and EUCAST (1 U disc), assessment of zone-edge appearance, nitrocefin test and Etest for MIC determination. PCR of the blaZ gene was used as a reference method. RESULTS: Of the 112 isolates included in the study, 67% were susceptible to penicillin G according to blaZ PCR. The EUCAST disc diffusion test had 100% sensitivity, whereas the CLSI method had one very major error with a false-susceptible isolate. When zone-edge appearance was included in the assessment, the false-susceptible isolate was correctly classified as resistant. Foreign-body infection was the most common focus of infection, affecting 49% of the participants. Only 4% of the patients were treated with penicillin G. CONCLUSIONS: Penicillin susceptibility is common in S. lugdunensis and the disc diffusion method according to EUCAST had a higher sensitivity than that of CLSI. Assessment of zone-edge appearance could increase the sensitivity of the disc diffusion test. Penicillin susceptibility testing and treatment should be considered in S. lugdunensis infections. Oxford University Press 2020-05 2020-02-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7177478/ /pubmed/32016343 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkaa004 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Original Research Hagstrand Aldman, Malin Påhlman, Lisa I Evaluation of penicillin G susceptibility testing methods for Staphylococcus lugdunensis |
title | Evaluation of penicillin G susceptibility testing methods for Staphylococcus lugdunensis |
title_full | Evaluation of penicillin G susceptibility testing methods for Staphylococcus lugdunensis |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of penicillin G susceptibility testing methods for Staphylococcus lugdunensis |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of penicillin G susceptibility testing methods for Staphylococcus lugdunensis |
title_short | Evaluation of penicillin G susceptibility testing methods for Staphylococcus lugdunensis |
title_sort | evaluation of penicillin g susceptibility testing methods for staphylococcus lugdunensis |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7177478/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32016343 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jac/dkaa004 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hagstrandaldmanmalin evaluationofpenicillingsusceptibilitytestingmethodsforstaphylococcuslugdunensis AT pahlmanlisai evaluationofpenicillingsusceptibilitytestingmethodsforstaphylococcuslugdunensis |