Cargando…

Postnatal diagnosis of an occult uterine scar dehiscence after three uncomplicated vaginal births after Caesarean section: A case report

INTRODUCTION: The incidence of Caesarean sections has been increasing in the United Kingdom. Obstetricians have become more inclined to offer a trial of a vaginal birth to women following a single uncomplicated Caesarean section due to growing recognition of the high morbidity associated with repeat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kwong, Fong Lien, Hamoodi, Ibraheem
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7178318/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32346520
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crwh.2020.e00203
_version_ 1783525429334769664
author Kwong, Fong Lien
Hamoodi, Ibraheem
author_facet Kwong, Fong Lien
Hamoodi, Ibraheem
author_sort Kwong, Fong Lien
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The incidence of Caesarean sections has been increasing in the United Kingdom. Obstetricians have become more inclined to offer a trial of a vaginal birth to women following a single uncomplicated Caesarean section due to growing recognition of the high morbidity associated with repeat abdominal surgeries, and the relative rarity of a Caesarean scar defect causing complications at subsequent vaginal deliveries. The diagnosis of a Caesarean scar defect such as a uterine scar dehiscence in the postnatal period still remains elusive due to its vague presentation. An incorrect diagnosis or a delay in diagnosis can lead to unnecessary interventions or delay the management of patient symptoms. CASE PRESENTATION: A 35-year-old woman with a single Caesarean section and three subsequent uncomplicated vaginal deliveries was diagnosed with an occult scar dehiscence two weeks postnatally. She initially complained of persistent vaginal bleeding and underwent a suction evacuation for suspected retained placental tissue. Her symptoms did not improve, and a CT scan was requested to rule out a uterine perforation following the surgical procedure. The CT scan suggested a uterine dehiscence at the level of the previous scar. As the patient remained clinically well, her symptoms were managed conservatively. She underwent a laparoscopic sterilisation six months later and was discharged as the scar defect had fully resolved. CONCLUSION: Clinicians should remain vigilant about the possibility of an occult scar defect in women with a previous Caesarean section who present with persistent vaginal bleeding and pain in the postnatal period.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7178318
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71783182020-04-28 Postnatal diagnosis of an occult uterine scar dehiscence after three uncomplicated vaginal births after Caesarean section: A case report Kwong, Fong Lien Hamoodi, Ibraheem Case Rep Womens Health Article INTRODUCTION: The incidence of Caesarean sections has been increasing in the United Kingdom. Obstetricians have become more inclined to offer a trial of a vaginal birth to women following a single uncomplicated Caesarean section due to growing recognition of the high morbidity associated with repeat abdominal surgeries, and the relative rarity of a Caesarean scar defect causing complications at subsequent vaginal deliveries. The diagnosis of a Caesarean scar defect such as a uterine scar dehiscence in the postnatal period still remains elusive due to its vague presentation. An incorrect diagnosis or a delay in diagnosis can lead to unnecessary interventions or delay the management of patient symptoms. CASE PRESENTATION: A 35-year-old woman with a single Caesarean section and three subsequent uncomplicated vaginal deliveries was diagnosed with an occult scar dehiscence two weeks postnatally. She initially complained of persistent vaginal bleeding and underwent a suction evacuation for suspected retained placental tissue. Her symptoms did not improve, and a CT scan was requested to rule out a uterine perforation following the surgical procedure. The CT scan suggested a uterine dehiscence at the level of the previous scar. As the patient remained clinically well, her symptoms were managed conservatively. She underwent a laparoscopic sterilisation six months later and was discharged as the scar defect had fully resolved. CONCLUSION: Clinicians should remain vigilant about the possibility of an occult scar defect in women with a previous Caesarean section who present with persistent vaginal bleeding and pain in the postnatal period. Elsevier 2020-04-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7178318/ /pubmed/32346520 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crwh.2020.e00203 Text en Crown Copyright © 2020 Published by Elsevier B.V. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kwong, Fong Lien
Hamoodi, Ibraheem
Postnatal diagnosis of an occult uterine scar dehiscence after three uncomplicated vaginal births after Caesarean section: A case report
title Postnatal diagnosis of an occult uterine scar dehiscence after three uncomplicated vaginal births after Caesarean section: A case report
title_full Postnatal diagnosis of an occult uterine scar dehiscence after three uncomplicated vaginal births after Caesarean section: A case report
title_fullStr Postnatal diagnosis of an occult uterine scar dehiscence after three uncomplicated vaginal births after Caesarean section: A case report
title_full_unstemmed Postnatal diagnosis of an occult uterine scar dehiscence after three uncomplicated vaginal births after Caesarean section: A case report
title_short Postnatal diagnosis of an occult uterine scar dehiscence after three uncomplicated vaginal births after Caesarean section: A case report
title_sort postnatal diagnosis of an occult uterine scar dehiscence after three uncomplicated vaginal births after caesarean section: a case report
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7178318/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32346520
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.crwh.2020.e00203
work_keys_str_mv AT kwongfonglien postnataldiagnosisofanoccultuterinescardehiscenceafterthreeuncomplicatedvaginalbirthsaftercaesareansectionacasereport
AT hamoodiibraheem postnataldiagnosisofanoccultuterinescardehiscenceafterthreeuncomplicatedvaginalbirthsaftercaesareansectionacasereport