Cargando…

Experimental Modeling and Optimization of CO(2) Absorption into Piperazine Solutions Using RSM-CCD Methodology

[Image: see text] The present work evaluates and optimizes CO(2) absorption in a bubble column for the Pz-H(2)O–CO(2) system. We analyzed the impact of the different operating conditions on the hydrodynamic and mass-transfer performance. For the optimization of the process, variable conditions were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pashaei, Hassan, Ghaemi, Ahad, Nasiri, Masoud, Karami, Bita
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2020
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7178350/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32337405
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.9b03363
Descripción
Sumario:[Image: see text] The present work evaluates and optimizes CO(2) absorption in a bubble column for the Pz-H(2)O–CO(2) system. We analyzed the impact of the different operating conditions on the hydrodynamic and mass-transfer performance. For the optimization of the process, variable conditions were used in the multivariate statistical method of response surface methodology. The central composite design is used to characterize the operating condition to fit the models by the least-squares method. The experimental data were fitted to quadratic equations using multiple regressions and analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA). An approved experiment was carried out to analyze the correctness of the optimization method, and a maximum CO(2) removal efficiency of 97.9%, an absorption rate of 3.12 g/min, an N(CO(2)) of 0.0164 mol/m(2)·s, and a CO(2) loading of 0.258 mol/mol were obtained under the optimized conditions. Our results suggest that Pz concentration, solution flow rate, CO(2) flow rate, and speed of stirrer were obtained to be 0.162 M, 0.502 l/h, 2.199 l/min, and 68.89 rpm, respectively, based on the optimal conditions. The p-value for all dependent variables was less than 0.05, and that points that all three models were remarkable. In addition, the experiment values acquired for the CO(2) capture were found to agree satisfactorily with the model values (R(2) = 0.944–0.999).