Cargando…
Physical rehabilitation in patients with head and neck cancer: Impact on health‐related quality of life and suitability of a post‐treatment program
OBJECTIVE: Physical rehabilitation programs hold the potential to mitigate deterioration in health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with head and neck cancer. The objective was to assess development in relevant domains of HRQoL following a physical exercise and nutrition intervention admi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7178444/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32337365 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.368 |
_version_ | 1783525456357621760 |
---|---|
author | Sandmæl, Jon Arne Bye, Asta Solheim, Tora S. Balstad, Trude R. Thorsen, Lene Skovlund, Eva Kaasa, Stein Lund, Jo‐Åsmund Oldervoll, Line |
author_facet | Sandmæl, Jon Arne Bye, Asta Solheim, Tora S. Balstad, Trude R. Thorsen, Lene Skovlund, Eva Kaasa, Stein Lund, Jo‐Åsmund Oldervoll, Line |
author_sort | Sandmæl, Jon Arne |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: Physical rehabilitation programs hold the potential to mitigate deterioration in health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with head and neck cancer. The objective was to assess development in relevant domains of HRQoL following a physical exercise and nutrition intervention administrated during or after treatment. METHODS: In a pilot study, 41 patients were randomized to resistance training and oral nutritional supplements during (EN‐DUR, n = 20) or after (EN‐AF, n = 21) radiotherapy. Global health status/QoL (GHS) and physical functioning (PF) were measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) quality of life questionnaire at baseline, week 6, and week 14. Differences between the groups were assessed by analysis of covariance. A difference of ≥10 points in GHS and PF was interpreted as clinically relevant. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were detected between the groups; however, clinically relevant changes and differences in GHS and PF were observed. From baseline to week 6, GHS decreased 9 points in the EN‐DUR group and 23 points in the EN‐AF group and PF decreased 13 points and 21 points, respectively. From week 6 to week 14, GHS increased 14 points in the EN‐DUR group and 26 points EN‐AF group and PF did not change (0 points) in the EN‐DUR group and increased 16 points in the EN‐AF group. CONCLUSION: The findings from the present pilot study are promising and indicate that a physical rehabilitation program may have a positive impact on HRQoL during treatment and enhance recovery after treatment. A definitive randomized trial is warranted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1b—Individual randomized controlled trial. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7178444 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71784442020-04-24 Physical rehabilitation in patients with head and neck cancer: Impact on health‐related quality of life and suitability of a post‐treatment program Sandmæl, Jon Arne Bye, Asta Solheim, Tora S. Balstad, Trude R. Thorsen, Lene Skovlund, Eva Kaasa, Stein Lund, Jo‐Åsmund Oldervoll, Line Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol Health Policy and Outcomes OBJECTIVE: Physical rehabilitation programs hold the potential to mitigate deterioration in health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with head and neck cancer. The objective was to assess development in relevant domains of HRQoL following a physical exercise and nutrition intervention administrated during or after treatment. METHODS: In a pilot study, 41 patients were randomized to resistance training and oral nutritional supplements during (EN‐DUR, n = 20) or after (EN‐AF, n = 21) radiotherapy. Global health status/QoL (GHS) and physical functioning (PF) were measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) quality of life questionnaire at baseline, week 6, and week 14. Differences between the groups were assessed by analysis of covariance. A difference of ≥10 points in GHS and PF was interpreted as clinically relevant. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were detected between the groups; however, clinically relevant changes and differences in GHS and PF were observed. From baseline to week 6, GHS decreased 9 points in the EN‐DUR group and 23 points in the EN‐AF group and PF decreased 13 points and 21 points, respectively. From week 6 to week 14, GHS increased 14 points in the EN‐DUR group and 26 points EN‐AF group and PF did not change (0 points) in the EN‐DUR group and increased 16 points in the EN‐AF group. CONCLUSION: The findings from the present pilot study are promising and indicate that a physical rehabilitation program may have a positive impact on HRQoL during treatment and enhance recovery after treatment. A definitive randomized trial is warranted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1b—Individual randomized controlled trial. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7178444/ /pubmed/32337365 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.368 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of The Triological Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Health Policy and Outcomes Sandmæl, Jon Arne Bye, Asta Solheim, Tora S. Balstad, Trude R. Thorsen, Lene Skovlund, Eva Kaasa, Stein Lund, Jo‐Åsmund Oldervoll, Line Physical rehabilitation in patients with head and neck cancer: Impact on health‐related quality of life and suitability of a post‐treatment program |
title | Physical rehabilitation in patients with head and neck cancer: Impact on health‐related quality of life and suitability of a post‐treatment program |
title_full | Physical rehabilitation in patients with head and neck cancer: Impact on health‐related quality of life and suitability of a post‐treatment program |
title_fullStr | Physical rehabilitation in patients with head and neck cancer: Impact on health‐related quality of life and suitability of a post‐treatment program |
title_full_unstemmed | Physical rehabilitation in patients with head and neck cancer: Impact on health‐related quality of life and suitability of a post‐treatment program |
title_short | Physical rehabilitation in patients with head and neck cancer: Impact on health‐related quality of life and suitability of a post‐treatment program |
title_sort | physical rehabilitation in patients with head and neck cancer: impact on health‐related quality of life and suitability of a post‐treatment program |
topic | Health Policy and Outcomes |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7178444/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32337365 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.368 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sandmæljonarne physicalrehabilitationinpatientswithheadandneckcancerimpactonhealthrelatedqualityoflifeandsuitabilityofaposttreatmentprogram AT byeasta physicalrehabilitationinpatientswithheadandneckcancerimpactonhealthrelatedqualityoflifeandsuitabilityofaposttreatmentprogram AT solheimtoras physicalrehabilitationinpatientswithheadandneckcancerimpactonhealthrelatedqualityoflifeandsuitabilityofaposttreatmentprogram AT balstadtruder physicalrehabilitationinpatientswithheadandneckcancerimpactonhealthrelatedqualityoflifeandsuitabilityofaposttreatmentprogram AT thorsenlene physicalrehabilitationinpatientswithheadandneckcancerimpactonhealthrelatedqualityoflifeandsuitabilityofaposttreatmentprogram AT skovlundeva physicalrehabilitationinpatientswithheadandneckcancerimpactonhealthrelatedqualityoflifeandsuitabilityofaposttreatmentprogram AT kaasastein physicalrehabilitationinpatientswithheadandneckcancerimpactonhealthrelatedqualityoflifeandsuitabilityofaposttreatmentprogram AT lundjoasmund physicalrehabilitationinpatientswithheadandneckcancerimpactonhealthrelatedqualityoflifeandsuitabilityofaposttreatmentprogram AT oldervollline physicalrehabilitationinpatientswithheadandneckcancerimpactonhealthrelatedqualityoflifeandsuitabilityofaposttreatmentprogram |