Cargando…

Physical rehabilitation in patients with head and neck cancer: Impact on health‐related quality of life and suitability of a post‐treatment program

OBJECTIVE: Physical rehabilitation programs hold the potential to mitigate deterioration in health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with head and neck cancer. The objective was to assess development in relevant domains of HRQoL following a physical exercise and nutrition intervention admi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sandmæl, Jon Arne, Bye, Asta, Solheim, Tora S., Balstad, Trude R., Thorsen, Lene, Skovlund, Eva, Kaasa, Stein, Lund, Jo‐Åsmund, Oldervoll, Line
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7178444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32337365
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.368
_version_ 1783525456357621760
author Sandmæl, Jon Arne
Bye, Asta
Solheim, Tora S.
Balstad, Trude R.
Thorsen, Lene
Skovlund, Eva
Kaasa, Stein
Lund, Jo‐Åsmund
Oldervoll, Line
author_facet Sandmæl, Jon Arne
Bye, Asta
Solheim, Tora S.
Balstad, Trude R.
Thorsen, Lene
Skovlund, Eva
Kaasa, Stein
Lund, Jo‐Åsmund
Oldervoll, Line
author_sort Sandmæl, Jon Arne
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Physical rehabilitation programs hold the potential to mitigate deterioration in health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with head and neck cancer. The objective was to assess development in relevant domains of HRQoL following a physical exercise and nutrition intervention administrated during or after treatment. METHODS: In a pilot study, 41 patients were randomized to resistance training and oral nutritional supplements during (EN‐DUR, n = 20) or after (EN‐AF, n = 21) radiotherapy. Global health status/QoL (GHS) and physical functioning (PF) were measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) quality of life questionnaire at baseline, week 6, and week 14. Differences between the groups were assessed by analysis of covariance. A difference of ≥10 points in GHS and PF was interpreted as clinically relevant. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were detected between the groups; however, clinically relevant changes and differences in GHS and PF were observed. From baseline to week 6, GHS decreased 9 points in the EN‐DUR group and 23 points in the EN‐AF group and PF decreased 13 points and 21 points, respectively. From week 6 to week 14, GHS increased 14 points in the EN‐DUR group and 26 points EN‐AF group and PF did not change (0 points) in the EN‐DUR group and increased 16 points in the EN‐AF group. CONCLUSION: The findings from the present pilot study are promising and indicate that a physical rehabilitation program may have a positive impact on HRQoL during treatment and enhance recovery after treatment. A definitive randomized trial is warranted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1b—Individual randomized controlled trial.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7178444
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71784442020-04-24 Physical rehabilitation in patients with head and neck cancer: Impact on health‐related quality of life and suitability of a post‐treatment program Sandmæl, Jon Arne Bye, Asta Solheim, Tora S. Balstad, Trude R. Thorsen, Lene Skovlund, Eva Kaasa, Stein Lund, Jo‐Åsmund Oldervoll, Line Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol Health Policy and Outcomes OBJECTIVE: Physical rehabilitation programs hold the potential to mitigate deterioration in health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with head and neck cancer. The objective was to assess development in relevant domains of HRQoL following a physical exercise and nutrition intervention administrated during or after treatment. METHODS: In a pilot study, 41 patients were randomized to resistance training and oral nutritional supplements during (EN‐DUR, n = 20) or after (EN‐AF, n = 21) radiotherapy. Global health status/QoL (GHS) and physical functioning (PF) were measured by the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) quality of life questionnaire at baseline, week 6, and week 14. Differences between the groups were assessed by analysis of covariance. A difference of ≥10 points in GHS and PF was interpreted as clinically relevant. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were detected between the groups; however, clinically relevant changes and differences in GHS and PF were observed. From baseline to week 6, GHS decreased 9 points in the EN‐DUR group and 23 points in the EN‐AF group and PF decreased 13 points and 21 points, respectively. From week 6 to week 14, GHS increased 14 points in the EN‐DUR group and 26 points EN‐AF group and PF did not change (0 points) in the EN‐DUR group and increased 16 points in the EN‐AF group. CONCLUSION: The findings from the present pilot study are promising and indicate that a physical rehabilitation program may have a positive impact on HRQoL during treatment and enhance recovery after treatment. A definitive randomized trial is warranted. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 1b—Individual randomized controlled trial. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7178444/ /pubmed/32337365 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.368 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of The Triological Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Health Policy and Outcomes
Sandmæl, Jon Arne
Bye, Asta
Solheim, Tora S.
Balstad, Trude R.
Thorsen, Lene
Skovlund, Eva
Kaasa, Stein
Lund, Jo‐Åsmund
Oldervoll, Line
Physical rehabilitation in patients with head and neck cancer: Impact on health‐related quality of life and suitability of a post‐treatment program
title Physical rehabilitation in patients with head and neck cancer: Impact on health‐related quality of life and suitability of a post‐treatment program
title_full Physical rehabilitation in patients with head and neck cancer: Impact on health‐related quality of life and suitability of a post‐treatment program
title_fullStr Physical rehabilitation in patients with head and neck cancer: Impact on health‐related quality of life and suitability of a post‐treatment program
title_full_unstemmed Physical rehabilitation in patients with head and neck cancer: Impact on health‐related quality of life and suitability of a post‐treatment program
title_short Physical rehabilitation in patients with head and neck cancer: Impact on health‐related quality of life and suitability of a post‐treatment program
title_sort physical rehabilitation in patients with head and neck cancer: impact on health‐related quality of life and suitability of a post‐treatment program
topic Health Policy and Outcomes
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7178444/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32337365
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.368
work_keys_str_mv AT sandmæljonarne physicalrehabilitationinpatientswithheadandneckcancerimpactonhealthrelatedqualityoflifeandsuitabilityofaposttreatmentprogram
AT byeasta physicalrehabilitationinpatientswithheadandneckcancerimpactonhealthrelatedqualityoflifeandsuitabilityofaposttreatmentprogram
AT solheimtoras physicalrehabilitationinpatientswithheadandneckcancerimpactonhealthrelatedqualityoflifeandsuitabilityofaposttreatmentprogram
AT balstadtruder physicalrehabilitationinpatientswithheadandneckcancerimpactonhealthrelatedqualityoflifeandsuitabilityofaposttreatmentprogram
AT thorsenlene physicalrehabilitationinpatientswithheadandneckcancerimpactonhealthrelatedqualityoflifeandsuitabilityofaposttreatmentprogram
AT skovlundeva physicalrehabilitationinpatientswithheadandneckcancerimpactonhealthrelatedqualityoflifeandsuitabilityofaposttreatmentprogram
AT kaasastein physicalrehabilitationinpatientswithheadandneckcancerimpactonhealthrelatedqualityoflifeandsuitabilityofaposttreatmentprogram
AT lundjoasmund physicalrehabilitationinpatientswithheadandneckcancerimpactonhealthrelatedqualityoflifeandsuitabilityofaposttreatmentprogram
AT oldervollline physicalrehabilitationinpatientswithheadandneckcancerimpactonhealthrelatedqualityoflifeandsuitabilityofaposttreatmentprogram