Cargando…

Vagus nerve stimulation paired with tones for tinnitus suppression: Effects on voice and hearing

OBJECTIVE: In individuals with chronic tinnitus, our interest was to determine whether daily low‐level electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve paired with tones (paired‐VNSt) for tinnitus suppression had any adverse effects on motor‐speech production and physiological acoustics of sustained vowels...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kochilas, Helen L., Cacace, Anthony T., Arnold, Amy, Seidman, Michael D., Tarver, W. Brent
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7178458/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32337360
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.364
_version_ 1783525459596673024
author Kochilas, Helen L.
Cacace, Anthony T.
Arnold, Amy
Seidman, Michael D.
Tarver, W. Brent
author_facet Kochilas, Helen L.
Cacace, Anthony T.
Arnold, Amy
Seidman, Michael D.
Tarver, W. Brent
author_sort Kochilas, Helen L.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: In individuals with chronic tinnitus, our interest was to determine whether daily low‐level electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve paired with tones (paired‐VNSt) for tinnitus suppression had any adverse effects on motor‐speech production and physiological acoustics of sustained vowels. Similarly, we were also interested in evaluating for changes in pure‐tone thresholds, word‐recognition performance, and minimum‐masking levels. Both voice and hearing functions were measured repeatedly over a period of 1 year. STUDY DESIGN: Longitudinal with repeated‐measures. METHODS: Digitized samples of sustained frontal, midline, and back vowels (/e/, /o/, /ah/) were analyzed with computer software to quantify the degree of jitter, shimmer, and harmonic‐to‐noise ratio contained in these waveforms. Pure‐tone thresholds, monosyllabic word‐recognition performance, and MMLs were also evaluated for VNS alterations. Linear‐regression analysis was the benchmark statistic used to document change over time in voice and hearing status from a baseline condition. RESULTS: Most of the regression functions for the vocal samples and audiometric variables had slope values that were not significantly different from zero. Four of the nine vocal functions showed a significant improvement over time, whereas three of the pure tone regression functions at 2‐4 kHz showed some degree of decline; all changes observed were for the left ear, all were at adjacent frequencies, and all were ipsilateral to the side of VNS. However, mean pure‐tone threshold changes did not exceed 4.29 dB from baseline and therefore, would not be considered clinically significant. In some individuals, larger threshold shifts were observed. No significant regression/slope effects were observed for word‐recognition or MMLs. CONCLUSION: Quantitative voice analysis and assessment of audiometric variables showed minimal if any evidence of adverse effects using paired‐VNSt over a treatment period of 1 year. Therefore, we conclude that paired‐VNSt is a safe tool for tinnitus abatement in humans without significant side effects. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7178458
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71784582020-04-24 Vagus nerve stimulation paired with tones for tinnitus suppression: Effects on voice and hearing Kochilas, Helen L. Cacace, Anthony T. Arnold, Amy Seidman, Michael D. Tarver, W. Brent Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol Otology, Neurotology, and Neuroscience OBJECTIVE: In individuals with chronic tinnitus, our interest was to determine whether daily low‐level electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve paired with tones (paired‐VNSt) for tinnitus suppression had any adverse effects on motor‐speech production and physiological acoustics of sustained vowels. Similarly, we were also interested in evaluating for changes in pure‐tone thresholds, word‐recognition performance, and minimum‐masking levels. Both voice and hearing functions were measured repeatedly over a period of 1 year. STUDY DESIGN: Longitudinal with repeated‐measures. METHODS: Digitized samples of sustained frontal, midline, and back vowels (/e/, /o/, /ah/) were analyzed with computer software to quantify the degree of jitter, shimmer, and harmonic‐to‐noise ratio contained in these waveforms. Pure‐tone thresholds, monosyllabic word‐recognition performance, and MMLs were also evaluated for VNS alterations. Linear‐regression analysis was the benchmark statistic used to document change over time in voice and hearing status from a baseline condition. RESULTS: Most of the regression functions for the vocal samples and audiometric variables had slope values that were not significantly different from zero. Four of the nine vocal functions showed a significant improvement over time, whereas three of the pure tone regression functions at 2‐4 kHz showed some degree of decline; all changes observed were for the left ear, all were at adjacent frequencies, and all were ipsilateral to the side of VNS. However, mean pure‐tone threshold changes did not exceed 4.29 dB from baseline and therefore, would not be considered clinically significant. In some individuals, larger threshold shifts were observed. No significant regression/slope effects were observed for word‐recognition or MMLs. CONCLUSION: Quantitative voice analysis and assessment of audiometric variables showed minimal if any evidence of adverse effects using paired‐VNSt over a treatment period of 1 year. Therefore, we conclude that paired‐VNSt is a safe tool for tinnitus abatement in humans without significant side effects. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020-03-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7178458/ /pubmed/32337360 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.364 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of The Triological Society. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Otology, Neurotology, and Neuroscience
Kochilas, Helen L.
Cacace, Anthony T.
Arnold, Amy
Seidman, Michael D.
Tarver, W. Brent
Vagus nerve stimulation paired with tones for tinnitus suppression: Effects on voice and hearing
title Vagus nerve stimulation paired with tones for tinnitus suppression: Effects on voice and hearing
title_full Vagus nerve stimulation paired with tones for tinnitus suppression: Effects on voice and hearing
title_fullStr Vagus nerve stimulation paired with tones for tinnitus suppression: Effects on voice and hearing
title_full_unstemmed Vagus nerve stimulation paired with tones for tinnitus suppression: Effects on voice and hearing
title_short Vagus nerve stimulation paired with tones for tinnitus suppression: Effects on voice and hearing
title_sort vagus nerve stimulation paired with tones for tinnitus suppression: effects on voice and hearing
topic Otology, Neurotology, and Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7178458/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32337360
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/lio2.364
work_keys_str_mv AT kochilashelenl vagusnervestimulationpairedwithtonesfortinnitussuppressioneffectsonvoiceandhearing
AT cacaceanthonyt vagusnervestimulationpairedwithtonesfortinnitussuppressioneffectsonvoiceandhearing
AT arnoldamy vagusnervestimulationpairedwithtonesfortinnitussuppressioneffectsonvoiceandhearing
AT seidmanmichaeld vagusnervestimulationpairedwithtonesfortinnitussuppressioneffectsonvoiceandhearing
AT tarverwbrent vagusnervestimulationpairedwithtonesfortinnitussuppressioneffectsonvoiceandhearing