Cargando…

Antimicrobials administration time in patients with suspected sepsis: is faster better? An analysis by propensity score

BACKGROUND: Early use of antimicrobials is a critical intervention in the treatment of patients with sepsis. The exact time of initiation is controversial and its early administration may be a difficult task in crowded emergency departments (ED). The aim of this study was to estimate, using a matche...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ascuntar, Johana, Mendoza, Deibie, Jaimes, Fabián
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7178597/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32337048
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40560-020-00448-1
_version_ 1783525492446461952
author Ascuntar, Johana
Mendoza, Deibie
Jaimes, Fabián
author_facet Ascuntar, Johana
Mendoza, Deibie
Jaimes, Fabián
author_sort Ascuntar, Johana
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Early use of antimicrobials is a critical intervention in the treatment of patients with sepsis. The exact time of initiation is controversial and its early administration may be a difficult task in crowded emergency departments (ED). The aim of this study was to estimate, using a matched propensity score, the effect on hospital mortality of administration of antimicrobials within 1 or 3 hours, in patients admitted to the ED with sepsis. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of a multicenter prospective cohort. Patients included in the study were older than 18 years, hospitalized between 2014 and 2016 with suspected sepsis, and admitted to ED of three tertiary care university hospitals in Medellín, Colombia. A propensity score analysis for administration of antimicrobials, both within 1 and 3 h of admission by the ED, was fitted with 28 variables related with clinical attention and physiological changes. As a sensitivity analysis, a logistic regression model was fitted for antimicrobial use adjusted both by propensity score and confounding variables. RESULTS: The study cohort was composed of 2454 patients with a median age of 62 years (IQR = 46–74). Among them, 32% (n = 781) received antibiotics within 3 h and 14% (n = 340) within the first hour. The main diagnoses were urinary tract infection (28%, n = 682) and pneumonia (27%, n = 671). Blood cultures were obtained in 87% (n = 2140) and yielded positive in 29% (n = 629), mainly with Escherichia coli (37%, n = 230), Staphylococcus aureus (21%, n = 132), and Klebsiella pneumoniae (10.2%, n = 64). The hospital mortality rate was 11.5% (n = 283). There were no significant differences in mortality, after adjustment, using antimicrobials either in the first hour (OR 1.03; 95% CI = 0.63; 1.70) or 3 h (OR 0.85; 95% CI = 0.61; 1.20). There were no changes with different models for sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the obvious constraints given for sample size and residual confounding, our results suggest that we need a more comprehensive approach to sepsis and its treatment, considering early detection, multiple interventions, and goals beyond the simple time-to-antimicrobials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7178597
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71785972020-04-24 Antimicrobials administration time in patients with suspected sepsis: is faster better? An analysis by propensity score Ascuntar, Johana Mendoza, Deibie Jaimes, Fabián J Intensive Care Research BACKGROUND: Early use of antimicrobials is a critical intervention in the treatment of patients with sepsis. The exact time of initiation is controversial and its early administration may be a difficult task in crowded emergency departments (ED). The aim of this study was to estimate, using a matched propensity score, the effect on hospital mortality of administration of antimicrobials within 1 or 3 hours, in patients admitted to the ED with sepsis. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of a multicenter prospective cohort. Patients included in the study were older than 18 years, hospitalized between 2014 and 2016 with suspected sepsis, and admitted to ED of three tertiary care university hospitals in Medellín, Colombia. A propensity score analysis for administration of antimicrobials, both within 1 and 3 h of admission by the ED, was fitted with 28 variables related with clinical attention and physiological changes. As a sensitivity analysis, a logistic regression model was fitted for antimicrobial use adjusted both by propensity score and confounding variables. RESULTS: The study cohort was composed of 2454 patients with a median age of 62 years (IQR = 46–74). Among them, 32% (n = 781) received antibiotics within 3 h and 14% (n = 340) within the first hour. The main diagnoses were urinary tract infection (28%, n = 682) and pneumonia (27%, n = 671). Blood cultures were obtained in 87% (n = 2140) and yielded positive in 29% (n = 629), mainly with Escherichia coli (37%, n = 230), Staphylococcus aureus (21%, n = 132), and Klebsiella pneumoniae (10.2%, n = 64). The hospital mortality rate was 11.5% (n = 283). There were no significant differences in mortality, after adjustment, using antimicrobials either in the first hour (OR 1.03; 95% CI = 0.63; 1.70) or 3 h (OR 0.85; 95% CI = 0.61; 1.20). There were no changes with different models for sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the obvious constraints given for sample size and residual confounding, our results suggest that we need a more comprehensive approach to sepsis and its treatment, considering early detection, multiple interventions, and goals beyond the simple time-to-antimicrobials. BioMed Central 2020-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7178597/ /pubmed/32337048 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40560-020-00448-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Ascuntar, Johana
Mendoza, Deibie
Jaimes, Fabián
Antimicrobials administration time in patients with suspected sepsis: is faster better? An analysis by propensity score
title Antimicrobials administration time in patients with suspected sepsis: is faster better? An analysis by propensity score
title_full Antimicrobials administration time in patients with suspected sepsis: is faster better? An analysis by propensity score
title_fullStr Antimicrobials administration time in patients with suspected sepsis: is faster better? An analysis by propensity score
title_full_unstemmed Antimicrobials administration time in patients with suspected sepsis: is faster better? An analysis by propensity score
title_short Antimicrobials administration time in patients with suspected sepsis: is faster better? An analysis by propensity score
title_sort antimicrobials administration time in patients with suspected sepsis: is faster better? an analysis by propensity score
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7178597/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32337048
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40560-020-00448-1
work_keys_str_mv AT ascuntarjohana antimicrobialsadministrationtimeinpatientswithsuspectedsepsisisfasterbetterananalysisbypropensityscore
AT mendozadeibie antimicrobialsadministrationtimeinpatientswithsuspectedsepsisisfasterbetterananalysisbypropensityscore
AT jaimesfabian antimicrobialsadministrationtimeinpatientswithsuspectedsepsisisfasterbetterananalysisbypropensityscore