Cargando…
Convection-Induced vs. Microwave Radiation-Induced in situ Drug Amorphization
The aim of the study was to investigate the suitability of a convection oven to induce in situ amorphization. The study was conducted using microwave radiation-induced in situ amorphization as reference, as it has recently been shown to enable the preparation of a fully (100%) amorphous solid disper...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7179224/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32121006 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules25051068 |
_version_ | 1783525625356615680 |
---|---|
author | Hempel, Nele-Johanna Knopp, Matthias M. Berthelsen, Ragna Löbmann, Korbinian |
author_facet | Hempel, Nele-Johanna Knopp, Matthias M. Berthelsen, Ragna Löbmann, Korbinian |
author_sort | Hempel, Nele-Johanna |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of the study was to investigate the suitability of a convection oven to induce in situ amorphization. The study was conducted using microwave radiation-induced in situ amorphization as reference, as it has recently been shown to enable the preparation of a fully (100%) amorphous solid dispersion of celecoxib (CCX) in polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) after 10 min of continuous microwaving. For comparison, the experimental setup of the microwave-induced method was mimicked for the convection-induced method. Compacts containing crystalline CCX and PVP were prepared and either pre-conditioned at 75% relative humidity or kept dry to investigate the effect of sorbed water on the amorphization kinetics. Subsequently, the compacts were heated for 5, 10, 15, 20, or 30 min in the convection oven at 100 °C. The degree of amorphization of CCX in the compacts was subsequently quantified using transmission Raman spectroscopy. Using the convection oven, the maximum degree of amorphization achieved was 96.1% ± 2.1% (n = 3) for the conditioned compacts after 30 min of heating and 14.3% ± 1.4% (n = 3) for the dry compacts after 20 min of heating, respectively. Based on the results from the convection and the microwave oven, it was found that the sorbed water acts as a plasticizer in the conditioned compacts (i.e., increasing molecular mobility), which is advantageous for in situ amorphization in both methods. Since the underlying mechanism of heating between the convection oven and microwave oven differs, it was found that convection-induced in situ amorphization is inferior to microwave radiation-induced in situ amorphization in terms of amorphization kinetics with the present experimental setup. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7179224 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71792242020-04-28 Convection-Induced vs. Microwave Radiation-Induced in situ Drug Amorphization Hempel, Nele-Johanna Knopp, Matthias M. Berthelsen, Ragna Löbmann, Korbinian Molecules Communication The aim of the study was to investigate the suitability of a convection oven to induce in situ amorphization. The study was conducted using microwave radiation-induced in situ amorphization as reference, as it has recently been shown to enable the preparation of a fully (100%) amorphous solid dispersion of celecoxib (CCX) in polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) after 10 min of continuous microwaving. For comparison, the experimental setup of the microwave-induced method was mimicked for the convection-induced method. Compacts containing crystalline CCX and PVP were prepared and either pre-conditioned at 75% relative humidity or kept dry to investigate the effect of sorbed water on the amorphization kinetics. Subsequently, the compacts were heated for 5, 10, 15, 20, or 30 min in the convection oven at 100 °C. The degree of amorphization of CCX in the compacts was subsequently quantified using transmission Raman spectroscopy. Using the convection oven, the maximum degree of amorphization achieved was 96.1% ± 2.1% (n = 3) for the conditioned compacts after 30 min of heating and 14.3% ± 1.4% (n = 3) for the dry compacts after 20 min of heating, respectively. Based on the results from the convection and the microwave oven, it was found that the sorbed water acts as a plasticizer in the conditioned compacts (i.e., increasing molecular mobility), which is advantageous for in situ amorphization in both methods. Since the underlying mechanism of heating between the convection oven and microwave oven differs, it was found that convection-induced in situ amorphization is inferior to microwave radiation-induced in situ amorphization in terms of amorphization kinetics with the present experimental setup. MDPI 2020-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7179224/ /pubmed/32121006 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules25051068 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Communication Hempel, Nele-Johanna Knopp, Matthias M. Berthelsen, Ragna Löbmann, Korbinian Convection-Induced vs. Microwave Radiation-Induced in situ Drug Amorphization |
title | Convection-Induced vs. Microwave Radiation-Induced in situ Drug Amorphization |
title_full | Convection-Induced vs. Microwave Radiation-Induced in situ Drug Amorphization |
title_fullStr | Convection-Induced vs. Microwave Radiation-Induced in situ Drug Amorphization |
title_full_unstemmed | Convection-Induced vs. Microwave Radiation-Induced in situ Drug Amorphization |
title_short | Convection-Induced vs. Microwave Radiation-Induced in situ Drug Amorphization |
title_sort | convection-induced vs. microwave radiation-induced in situ drug amorphization |
topic | Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7179224/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32121006 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/molecules25051068 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hempelnelejohanna convectioninducedvsmicrowaveradiationinducedinsitudrugamorphization AT knoppmatthiasm convectioninducedvsmicrowaveradiationinducedinsitudrugamorphization AT berthelsenragna convectioninducedvsmicrowaveradiationinducedinsitudrugamorphization AT lobmannkorbinian convectioninducedvsmicrowaveradiationinducedinsitudrugamorphization |