Cargando…

Socioneuroscience and its contributions to conscious versus unconscious volition and control. The case of gender violence prevention

Research in neuroscience is being very fruitful in providing evidence about the influence of social experience in the architecture and functioning of the brain. In so doing, neuroscience is posing new and fascinating research questions to examine in depth the social processes that produce those neur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mallart, Lídia Puigvert, García, Ramón Flecha, Racionero-Plaza, Sandra, Sordé-Martí, Teresa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: AIMS Press 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7179364/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32341977
http://dx.doi.org/10.3934/Neuroscience.2019.3.204
_version_ 1783525642731520000
author Mallart, Lídia Puigvert
García, Ramón Flecha
Racionero-Plaza, Sandra
Sordé-Martí, Teresa
author_facet Mallart, Lídia Puigvert
García, Ramón Flecha
Racionero-Plaza, Sandra
Sordé-Martí, Teresa
author_sort Mallart, Lídia Puigvert
collection PubMed
description Research in neuroscience is being very fruitful in providing evidence about the influence of social experience in the architecture and functioning of the brain. In so doing, neuroscience is posing new and fascinating research questions to examine in depth the social processes that produce those neural changes. To undertake the task of tackling such research questions, evidence from the social sciences are necessary to better understand how different types of social experiences produce different types of synaptic changes and even modify subcortical brain structures differently. It will be the dialogue between neuroscience, other natural sciences and the social sciences which will advance the scientific understanding of plastic changes in the brain which result from complex social experiences that have been traditionally studied by the social sciences. Socioneuroscience constitutes the arena for such interdisciplinary dialogue and research that can both advance the scientific understanding of the human brain and provide evidence-based solutions to most urgent social problems. Socioneuroscience studies the relations between the human brain and social interactions taking into account knowledge from all social sciences and the natural sciences. Processes of conscious versus unconscious social volition and control is one central area of inquiry in socioneuroscience. In this article, we discuss the dominant coercive discourse in society -which presents males with aggressive attitudes and behaviors as more attractive- as an example of social control of human volition which imprisons many individuals' sexual freedom. However, due to brain plasticity, certain experiences that question such dominant discourse and empty violence from attractiveness open up the possibility for the individual and the society to break free from the neural wiring imposed by the dominant coercive discourse and, in the words of Santiago Ramón y Cajal, be ourselves “the architects of our brain”, contributing to overcome violence against women.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7179364
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher AIMS Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71793642020-04-27 Socioneuroscience and its contributions to conscious versus unconscious volition and control. The case of gender violence prevention Mallart, Lídia Puigvert García, Ramón Flecha Racionero-Plaza, Sandra Sordé-Martí, Teresa AIMS Neurosci Theory Article Research in neuroscience is being very fruitful in providing evidence about the influence of social experience in the architecture and functioning of the brain. In so doing, neuroscience is posing new and fascinating research questions to examine in depth the social processes that produce those neural changes. To undertake the task of tackling such research questions, evidence from the social sciences are necessary to better understand how different types of social experiences produce different types of synaptic changes and even modify subcortical brain structures differently. It will be the dialogue between neuroscience, other natural sciences and the social sciences which will advance the scientific understanding of plastic changes in the brain which result from complex social experiences that have been traditionally studied by the social sciences. Socioneuroscience constitutes the arena for such interdisciplinary dialogue and research that can both advance the scientific understanding of the human brain and provide evidence-based solutions to most urgent social problems. Socioneuroscience studies the relations between the human brain and social interactions taking into account knowledge from all social sciences and the natural sciences. Processes of conscious versus unconscious social volition and control is one central area of inquiry in socioneuroscience. In this article, we discuss the dominant coercive discourse in society -which presents males with aggressive attitudes and behaviors as more attractive- as an example of social control of human volition which imprisons many individuals' sexual freedom. However, due to brain plasticity, certain experiences that question such dominant discourse and empty violence from attractiveness open up the possibility for the individual and the society to break free from the neural wiring imposed by the dominant coercive discourse and, in the words of Santiago Ramón y Cajal, be ourselves “the architects of our brain”, contributing to overcome violence against women. AIMS Press 2019-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7179364/ /pubmed/32341977 http://dx.doi.org/10.3934/Neuroscience.2019.3.204 Text en © 2019 the Author(s), licensee AIMS Press This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0)
spellingShingle Theory Article
Mallart, Lídia Puigvert
García, Ramón Flecha
Racionero-Plaza, Sandra
Sordé-Martí, Teresa
Socioneuroscience and its contributions to conscious versus unconscious volition and control. The case of gender violence prevention
title Socioneuroscience and its contributions to conscious versus unconscious volition and control. The case of gender violence prevention
title_full Socioneuroscience and its contributions to conscious versus unconscious volition and control. The case of gender violence prevention
title_fullStr Socioneuroscience and its contributions to conscious versus unconscious volition and control. The case of gender violence prevention
title_full_unstemmed Socioneuroscience and its contributions to conscious versus unconscious volition and control. The case of gender violence prevention
title_short Socioneuroscience and its contributions to conscious versus unconscious volition and control. The case of gender violence prevention
title_sort socioneuroscience and its contributions to conscious versus unconscious volition and control. the case of gender violence prevention
topic Theory Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7179364/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32341977
http://dx.doi.org/10.3934/Neuroscience.2019.3.204
work_keys_str_mv AT mallartlidiapuigvert socioneuroscienceanditscontributionstoconsciousversusunconsciousvolitionandcontrolthecaseofgenderviolenceprevention
AT garciaramonflecha socioneuroscienceanditscontributionstoconsciousversusunconsciousvolitionandcontrolthecaseofgenderviolenceprevention
AT racioneroplazasandra socioneuroscienceanditscontributionstoconsciousversusunconsciousvolitionandcontrolthecaseofgenderviolenceprevention
AT sordemartiteresa socioneuroscienceanditscontributionstoconsciousversusunconsciousvolitionandcontrolthecaseofgenderviolenceprevention