Cargando…
High-flow nasal cannula may be no safer than non-invasive positive pressure ventilation for COVID-19 patients
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7179373/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32326959 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-02892-9 |
_version_ | 1783525644484739072 |
---|---|
author | Remy, Kenneth E. Lin, John C. Verhoef, Philip A. |
author_facet | Remy, Kenneth E. Lin, John C. Verhoef, Philip A. |
author_sort | Remy, Kenneth E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7179373 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71793732020-04-23 High-flow nasal cannula may be no safer than non-invasive positive pressure ventilation for COVID-19 patients Remy, Kenneth E. Lin, John C. Verhoef, Philip A. Crit Care Research Letter BioMed Central 2020-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7179373/ /pubmed/32326959 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-02892-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Letter Remy, Kenneth E. Lin, John C. Verhoef, Philip A. High-flow nasal cannula may be no safer than non-invasive positive pressure ventilation for COVID-19 patients |
title | High-flow nasal cannula may be no safer than non-invasive positive pressure ventilation for COVID-19 patients |
title_full | High-flow nasal cannula may be no safer than non-invasive positive pressure ventilation for COVID-19 patients |
title_fullStr | High-flow nasal cannula may be no safer than non-invasive positive pressure ventilation for COVID-19 patients |
title_full_unstemmed | High-flow nasal cannula may be no safer than non-invasive positive pressure ventilation for COVID-19 patients |
title_short | High-flow nasal cannula may be no safer than non-invasive positive pressure ventilation for COVID-19 patients |
title_sort | high-flow nasal cannula may be no safer than non-invasive positive pressure ventilation for covid-19 patients |
topic | Research Letter |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7179373/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32326959 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-02892-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT remykennethe highflownasalcannulamaybenosaferthannoninvasivepositivepressureventilationforcovid19patients AT linjohnc highflownasalcannulamaybenosaferthannoninvasivepositivepressureventilationforcovid19patients AT verhoefphilipa highflownasalcannulamaybenosaferthannoninvasivepositivepressureventilationforcovid19patients |