Cargando…

Heterogeneity Among Poor Ovarian Responders According to Bologna Criteria Results in Diverging Cumulative Live Birth Rates

Research Question: Does reproductive outcome differ among the various subgroups of poor ovarian responders according to the Bologna criteria? Design: This was a retrospective, cohort study including poor ovarian responders according to Bologna criteria, undergoing an ICSI cycle from January 2011 unt...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Romito, Alessia, Bardhi, Erlisa, Errazuriz, Joaquin, Blockeel, Christophe, Santos-Ribeiro, Samuel, Vos, Michel De, Racca, Annalisa, Mackens, Shari, Kelen, Annelore Van Der, Panici, Pierluigi Benedetti, Vaiarelli, Alberto, Tournaye, Herman, Drakopoulos, Panagiotis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7179754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32373068
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2020.00208
_version_ 1783525696785612800
author Romito, Alessia
Bardhi, Erlisa
Errazuriz, Joaquin
Blockeel, Christophe
Santos-Ribeiro, Samuel
Vos, Michel De
Racca, Annalisa
Mackens, Shari
Kelen, Annelore Van Der
Panici, Pierluigi Benedetti
Vaiarelli, Alberto
Tournaye, Herman
Drakopoulos, Panagiotis
author_facet Romito, Alessia
Bardhi, Erlisa
Errazuriz, Joaquin
Blockeel, Christophe
Santos-Ribeiro, Samuel
Vos, Michel De
Racca, Annalisa
Mackens, Shari
Kelen, Annelore Van Der
Panici, Pierluigi Benedetti
Vaiarelli, Alberto
Tournaye, Herman
Drakopoulos, Panagiotis
author_sort Romito, Alessia
collection PubMed
description Research Question: Does reproductive outcome differ among the various subgroups of poor ovarian responders according to the Bologna criteria? Design: This was a retrospective, cohort study including poor ovarian responders according to Bologna criteria, undergoing an ICSI cycle from January 2011 until December 2017. Patients were divided into four groups: (1) age ≥ 40 years and abnormal ovarian response test, (2) age ≥ 40 years, abnormal ovarian reserve test and one previous poor response to stimulation, (3) age ≥ 40 years and one previous poor response, (4) abnormal ovarian reserve test and one previous poor response. Result(s): Overall, 846 cycles in 706 Bologna poor ovarian responders were included: 310 cycles in group 1, 169 in group 2, 52 in group 3, and 315 in group 4. There were significant differences in age, antral follicle count, antimüllerian hormone, cycle cancellation rates, and number of retrieved oocytes between the four groups. Live birth and cumulative live birth rate differed significantly between groups and were highest in Group 4 [Live birth rate: 7.4% (1) vs. 4.1% (2) vs. 5.8% (3) vs. 13.4% (4), p = 0.001 and Cumulative live birth rate: 8.3% (1) vs. 4.1 % (2) vs. 9.6% (3) vs. 16.8% (4) p < 0.001]. The multivariate GEE analysis revealed that the number of MIIs and the Bologna criteria pattern were the variables which were significantly associated with cumulative live birth rate. Conclusion(s): Poor ovarian responders represent a heterogeneous population. The young subpopulation has a better clinical prognosis in terms of fresh and cumulative live birth rate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7179754
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71797542020-05-05 Heterogeneity Among Poor Ovarian Responders According to Bologna Criteria Results in Diverging Cumulative Live Birth Rates Romito, Alessia Bardhi, Erlisa Errazuriz, Joaquin Blockeel, Christophe Santos-Ribeiro, Samuel Vos, Michel De Racca, Annalisa Mackens, Shari Kelen, Annelore Van Der Panici, Pierluigi Benedetti Vaiarelli, Alberto Tournaye, Herman Drakopoulos, Panagiotis Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) Endocrinology Research Question: Does reproductive outcome differ among the various subgroups of poor ovarian responders according to the Bologna criteria? Design: This was a retrospective, cohort study including poor ovarian responders according to Bologna criteria, undergoing an ICSI cycle from January 2011 until December 2017. Patients were divided into four groups: (1) age ≥ 40 years and abnormal ovarian response test, (2) age ≥ 40 years, abnormal ovarian reserve test and one previous poor response to stimulation, (3) age ≥ 40 years and one previous poor response, (4) abnormal ovarian reserve test and one previous poor response. Result(s): Overall, 846 cycles in 706 Bologna poor ovarian responders were included: 310 cycles in group 1, 169 in group 2, 52 in group 3, and 315 in group 4. There were significant differences in age, antral follicle count, antimüllerian hormone, cycle cancellation rates, and number of retrieved oocytes between the four groups. Live birth and cumulative live birth rate differed significantly between groups and were highest in Group 4 [Live birth rate: 7.4% (1) vs. 4.1% (2) vs. 5.8% (3) vs. 13.4% (4), p = 0.001 and Cumulative live birth rate: 8.3% (1) vs. 4.1 % (2) vs. 9.6% (3) vs. 16.8% (4) p < 0.001]. The multivariate GEE analysis revealed that the number of MIIs and the Bologna criteria pattern were the variables which were significantly associated with cumulative live birth rate. Conclusion(s): Poor ovarian responders represent a heterogeneous population. The young subpopulation has a better clinical prognosis in terms of fresh and cumulative live birth rate. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-04-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7179754/ /pubmed/32373068 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2020.00208 Text en Copyright © 2020 Romito, Bardhi, Errazuriz, Blockeel, Santos-Ribeiro, Vos, Racca, Mackens, Kelen, Panici, Vaiarelli, Tournaye and Drakopoulos. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Endocrinology
Romito, Alessia
Bardhi, Erlisa
Errazuriz, Joaquin
Blockeel, Christophe
Santos-Ribeiro, Samuel
Vos, Michel De
Racca, Annalisa
Mackens, Shari
Kelen, Annelore Van Der
Panici, Pierluigi Benedetti
Vaiarelli, Alberto
Tournaye, Herman
Drakopoulos, Panagiotis
Heterogeneity Among Poor Ovarian Responders According to Bologna Criteria Results in Diverging Cumulative Live Birth Rates
title Heterogeneity Among Poor Ovarian Responders According to Bologna Criteria Results in Diverging Cumulative Live Birth Rates
title_full Heterogeneity Among Poor Ovarian Responders According to Bologna Criteria Results in Diverging Cumulative Live Birth Rates
title_fullStr Heterogeneity Among Poor Ovarian Responders According to Bologna Criteria Results in Diverging Cumulative Live Birth Rates
title_full_unstemmed Heterogeneity Among Poor Ovarian Responders According to Bologna Criteria Results in Diverging Cumulative Live Birth Rates
title_short Heterogeneity Among Poor Ovarian Responders According to Bologna Criteria Results in Diverging Cumulative Live Birth Rates
title_sort heterogeneity among poor ovarian responders according to bologna criteria results in diverging cumulative live birth rates
topic Endocrinology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7179754/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32373068
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2020.00208
work_keys_str_mv AT romitoalessia heterogeneityamongpoorovarianrespondersaccordingtobolognacriteriaresultsindivergingcumulativelivebirthrates
AT bardhierlisa heterogeneityamongpoorovarianrespondersaccordingtobolognacriteriaresultsindivergingcumulativelivebirthrates
AT errazurizjoaquin heterogeneityamongpoorovarianrespondersaccordingtobolognacriteriaresultsindivergingcumulativelivebirthrates
AT blockeelchristophe heterogeneityamongpoorovarianrespondersaccordingtobolognacriteriaresultsindivergingcumulativelivebirthrates
AT santosribeirosamuel heterogeneityamongpoorovarianrespondersaccordingtobolognacriteriaresultsindivergingcumulativelivebirthrates
AT vosmichelde heterogeneityamongpoorovarianrespondersaccordingtobolognacriteriaresultsindivergingcumulativelivebirthrates
AT raccaannalisa heterogeneityamongpoorovarianrespondersaccordingtobolognacriteriaresultsindivergingcumulativelivebirthrates
AT mackensshari heterogeneityamongpoorovarianrespondersaccordingtobolognacriteriaresultsindivergingcumulativelivebirthrates
AT kelenannelorevander heterogeneityamongpoorovarianrespondersaccordingtobolognacriteriaresultsindivergingcumulativelivebirthrates
AT panicipierluigibenedetti heterogeneityamongpoorovarianrespondersaccordingtobolognacriteriaresultsindivergingcumulativelivebirthrates
AT vaiarellialberto heterogeneityamongpoorovarianrespondersaccordingtobolognacriteriaresultsindivergingcumulativelivebirthrates
AT tournayeherman heterogeneityamongpoorovarianrespondersaccordingtobolognacriteriaresultsindivergingcumulativelivebirthrates
AT drakopoulospanagiotis heterogeneityamongpoorovarianrespondersaccordingtobolognacriteriaresultsindivergingcumulativelivebirthrates