Cargando…

Cash-based assistance and the nutrition status of pregnant and lactating women in the Somalia food crisis: A comparison of two transfer modalities

BACKGROUND: Large-scale emergency assistance programmes in Somalia use a variety of transfer modalities including in-kind food provision, food vouchers, and cash transfers. Evidence is needed to better understand whether and how such modalities differ in reducing the risk of acute malnutrition in vu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Doocy, Shannon, Busingye, Martin, Lyles, Emily, Colantouni, Elizabeth, Aidam, Bridget, Ebulu, George, Savage, Kevin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7179869/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32324761
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230989
_version_ 1783525716982235136
author Doocy, Shannon
Busingye, Martin
Lyles, Emily
Colantouni, Elizabeth
Aidam, Bridget
Ebulu, George
Savage, Kevin
author_facet Doocy, Shannon
Busingye, Martin
Lyles, Emily
Colantouni, Elizabeth
Aidam, Bridget
Ebulu, George
Savage, Kevin
author_sort Doocy, Shannon
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Large-scale emergency assistance programmes in Somalia use a variety of transfer modalities including in-kind food provision, food vouchers, and cash transfers. Evidence is needed to better understand whether and how such modalities differ in reducing the risk of acute malnutrition in vulnerable groups, such as the 800,000 pregnant and lactating women affected by the 2017/18 food crisis. METHODS: Changes in diet and acute malnutrition status were assessed among pregnant and lactating women receiving similarly sized household transfers over a four-month period (total value of ~US$450 per household) delivered either as food vouchers or as mixed transfers consisting of in-kind food, vouchers, and cash. Baseline and endline comparisons were conducted for 514 women in Wajid, Somalia. Primary study outcomes were Minimum Dietary Diversity for Women, meal frequency, and mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC), with MUAC<21.0 cm classified as acute malnutrition. Adjusted analyses consisted of difference-in-difference analysis using linear and logistic regression models with inverse probability weighting based on propensity scores to account for the non-randomized design. FINDINGS: No significant difference in change in dietary quality was observed between food voucher and mixed transfer recipients; a significant difference in change in mean meal frequency was observed (0.3 meals/day, CI: 0.1–0.5, p = 0.001) and the mixed transfer group had significantly greater meal frequency at endline (p<0.001). Mean MUAC increased significantly among both voucher (0.9cm, CI: 0.6–1.3, p = 0.001) and mixed transfer recipients (1.3cm, CI: 1.1–1.5, p = 0.001) over the intervention period in adjusted analysis, however, the difference in magnitude of change between the two groups was not statistically significant (0.4cm, CI: -0.1–0.08, p = 0.086). CONCLUSIONS: Within the context of the 2017/18 Somalia food crisis, the modality of assistance provided to pregnant and lactating women (mixed transfers or food-vouchers) made no difference in preventing acute malnutrition and protecting nutritional status.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7179869
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71798692020-05-05 Cash-based assistance and the nutrition status of pregnant and lactating women in the Somalia food crisis: A comparison of two transfer modalities Doocy, Shannon Busingye, Martin Lyles, Emily Colantouni, Elizabeth Aidam, Bridget Ebulu, George Savage, Kevin PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Large-scale emergency assistance programmes in Somalia use a variety of transfer modalities including in-kind food provision, food vouchers, and cash transfers. Evidence is needed to better understand whether and how such modalities differ in reducing the risk of acute malnutrition in vulnerable groups, such as the 800,000 pregnant and lactating women affected by the 2017/18 food crisis. METHODS: Changes in diet and acute malnutrition status were assessed among pregnant and lactating women receiving similarly sized household transfers over a four-month period (total value of ~US$450 per household) delivered either as food vouchers or as mixed transfers consisting of in-kind food, vouchers, and cash. Baseline and endline comparisons were conducted for 514 women in Wajid, Somalia. Primary study outcomes were Minimum Dietary Diversity for Women, meal frequency, and mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC), with MUAC<21.0 cm classified as acute malnutrition. Adjusted analyses consisted of difference-in-difference analysis using linear and logistic regression models with inverse probability weighting based on propensity scores to account for the non-randomized design. FINDINGS: No significant difference in change in dietary quality was observed between food voucher and mixed transfer recipients; a significant difference in change in mean meal frequency was observed (0.3 meals/day, CI: 0.1–0.5, p = 0.001) and the mixed transfer group had significantly greater meal frequency at endline (p<0.001). Mean MUAC increased significantly among both voucher (0.9cm, CI: 0.6–1.3, p = 0.001) and mixed transfer recipients (1.3cm, CI: 1.1–1.5, p = 0.001) over the intervention period in adjusted analysis, however, the difference in magnitude of change between the two groups was not statistically significant (0.4cm, CI: -0.1–0.08, p = 0.086). CONCLUSIONS: Within the context of the 2017/18 Somalia food crisis, the modality of assistance provided to pregnant and lactating women (mixed transfers or food-vouchers) made no difference in preventing acute malnutrition and protecting nutritional status. Public Library of Science 2020-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7179869/ /pubmed/32324761 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230989 Text en © 2020 Doocy et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Doocy, Shannon
Busingye, Martin
Lyles, Emily
Colantouni, Elizabeth
Aidam, Bridget
Ebulu, George
Savage, Kevin
Cash-based assistance and the nutrition status of pregnant and lactating women in the Somalia food crisis: A comparison of two transfer modalities
title Cash-based assistance and the nutrition status of pregnant and lactating women in the Somalia food crisis: A comparison of two transfer modalities
title_full Cash-based assistance and the nutrition status of pregnant and lactating women in the Somalia food crisis: A comparison of two transfer modalities
title_fullStr Cash-based assistance and the nutrition status of pregnant and lactating women in the Somalia food crisis: A comparison of two transfer modalities
title_full_unstemmed Cash-based assistance and the nutrition status of pregnant and lactating women in the Somalia food crisis: A comparison of two transfer modalities
title_short Cash-based assistance and the nutrition status of pregnant and lactating women in the Somalia food crisis: A comparison of two transfer modalities
title_sort cash-based assistance and the nutrition status of pregnant and lactating women in the somalia food crisis: a comparison of two transfer modalities
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7179869/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32324761
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0230989
work_keys_str_mv AT doocyshannon cashbasedassistanceandthenutritionstatusofpregnantandlactatingwomeninthesomaliafoodcrisisacomparisonoftwotransfermodalities
AT busingyemartin cashbasedassistanceandthenutritionstatusofpregnantandlactatingwomeninthesomaliafoodcrisisacomparisonoftwotransfermodalities
AT lylesemily cashbasedassistanceandthenutritionstatusofpregnantandlactatingwomeninthesomaliafoodcrisisacomparisonoftwotransfermodalities
AT colantounielizabeth cashbasedassistanceandthenutritionstatusofpregnantandlactatingwomeninthesomaliafoodcrisisacomparisonoftwotransfermodalities
AT aidambridget cashbasedassistanceandthenutritionstatusofpregnantandlactatingwomeninthesomaliafoodcrisisacomparisonoftwotransfermodalities
AT ebulugeorge cashbasedassistanceandthenutritionstatusofpregnantandlactatingwomeninthesomaliafoodcrisisacomparisonoftwotransfermodalities
AT savagekevin cashbasedassistanceandthenutritionstatusofpregnantandlactatingwomeninthesomaliafoodcrisisacomparisonoftwotransfermodalities