Cargando…
The Feasibility of Remotely Piloted Aircrafts for VOR Flight Inspection
This article analyzes the use of Remotely Piloted Aircrafts (RPA) in VOR (Very High Frequency Omnidirectional Range) flight inspection. Initially, tests were performed to check whether the Autopilot Positioning System (APS) met the regulatory requirements. The results of these tests indicated that t...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7180946/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32244311 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20071947 |
_version_ | 1783525938795905024 |
---|---|
author | de Oliveira Costa, Diogo Oliveira, Neusa Maria Franco d’Amore, Roberto |
author_facet | de Oliveira Costa, Diogo Oliveira, Neusa Maria Franco d’Amore, Roberto |
author_sort | de Oliveira Costa, Diogo |
collection | PubMed |
description | This article analyzes the use of Remotely Piloted Aircrafts (RPA) in VOR (Very High Frequency Omnidirectional Range) flight inspection. Initially, tests were performed to check whether the Autopilot Positioning System (APS) met the regulatory requirements. The results of these tests indicated that the APS provided information within the standard regulations. A Hardware in the Loop (HIL) platform was implemented to perform flight tests following the waypoints generated by a mission automation routine. One test was performed without introducing disturbance into the proposed test platform. The other four tests were performed introducing errors in latitude and longitude in the APS into the platform. The errors introduced had the same characteristics as those measured in the initial tests, in order for the simulation tests to be as similar as possible to the real situation. The tests performed with positioning errors only did not lead to false misalignment detection. However, introducing positioning errors and a 4° VOR misalignment error, a misalignment of 3.99° was observed during the flight test. This is a value greater than the maximum one allowed by the regulations, and the system indicates the VOR misalignment. Five flight inspection tests were performed. In addition to the APS errors, tests with a modulation error were also conducted. Introducing a 4° VOR misalignment in conjunction with modulation error, a misalignment of 4.02° was observed, resulting in successful misalignment detection. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7180946 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-71809462020-04-30 The Feasibility of Remotely Piloted Aircrafts for VOR Flight Inspection de Oliveira Costa, Diogo Oliveira, Neusa Maria Franco d’Amore, Roberto Sensors (Basel) Article This article analyzes the use of Remotely Piloted Aircrafts (RPA) in VOR (Very High Frequency Omnidirectional Range) flight inspection. Initially, tests were performed to check whether the Autopilot Positioning System (APS) met the regulatory requirements. The results of these tests indicated that the APS provided information within the standard regulations. A Hardware in the Loop (HIL) platform was implemented to perform flight tests following the waypoints generated by a mission automation routine. One test was performed without introducing disturbance into the proposed test platform. The other four tests were performed introducing errors in latitude and longitude in the APS into the platform. The errors introduced had the same characteristics as those measured in the initial tests, in order for the simulation tests to be as similar as possible to the real situation. The tests performed with positioning errors only did not lead to false misalignment detection. However, introducing positioning errors and a 4° VOR misalignment error, a misalignment of 3.99° was observed during the flight test. This is a value greater than the maximum one allowed by the regulations, and the system indicates the VOR misalignment. Five flight inspection tests were performed. In addition to the APS errors, tests with a modulation error were also conducted. Introducing a 4° VOR misalignment in conjunction with modulation error, a misalignment of 4.02° was observed, resulting in successful misalignment detection. MDPI 2020-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7180946/ /pubmed/32244311 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20071947 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article de Oliveira Costa, Diogo Oliveira, Neusa Maria Franco d’Amore, Roberto The Feasibility of Remotely Piloted Aircrafts for VOR Flight Inspection |
title | The Feasibility of Remotely Piloted Aircrafts for VOR Flight Inspection |
title_full | The Feasibility of Remotely Piloted Aircrafts for VOR Flight Inspection |
title_fullStr | The Feasibility of Remotely Piloted Aircrafts for VOR Flight Inspection |
title_full_unstemmed | The Feasibility of Remotely Piloted Aircrafts for VOR Flight Inspection |
title_short | The Feasibility of Remotely Piloted Aircrafts for VOR Flight Inspection |
title_sort | feasibility of remotely piloted aircrafts for vor flight inspection |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7180946/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32244311 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20071947 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT deoliveiracostadiogo thefeasibilityofremotelypilotedaircraftsforvorflightinspection AT oliveiraneusamariafranco thefeasibilityofremotelypilotedaircraftsforvorflightinspection AT damoreroberto thefeasibilityofremotelypilotedaircraftsforvorflightinspection AT deoliveiracostadiogo feasibilityofremotelypilotedaircraftsforvorflightinspection AT oliveiraneusamariafranco feasibilityofremotelypilotedaircraftsforvorflightinspection AT damoreroberto feasibilityofremotelypilotedaircraftsforvorflightinspection |