Cargando…

The Feasibility of Remotely Piloted Aircrafts for VOR Flight Inspection

This article analyzes the use of Remotely Piloted Aircrafts (RPA) in VOR (Very High Frequency Omnidirectional Range) flight inspection. Initially, tests were performed to check whether the Autopilot Positioning System (APS) met the regulatory requirements. The results of these tests indicated that t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Oliveira Costa, Diogo, Oliveira, Neusa Maria Franco, d’Amore, Roberto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7180946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32244311
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20071947
_version_ 1783525938795905024
author de Oliveira Costa, Diogo
Oliveira, Neusa Maria Franco
d’Amore, Roberto
author_facet de Oliveira Costa, Diogo
Oliveira, Neusa Maria Franco
d’Amore, Roberto
author_sort de Oliveira Costa, Diogo
collection PubMed
description This article analyzes the use of Remotely Piloted Aircrafts (RPA) in VOR (Very High Frequency Omnidirectional Range) flight inspection. Initially, tests were performed to check whether the Autopilot Positioning System (APS) met the regulatory requirements. The results of these tests indicated that the APS provided information within the standard regulations. A Hardware in the Loop (HIL) platform was implemented to perform flight tests following the waypoints generated by a mission automation routine. One test was performed without introducing disturbance into the proposed test platform. The other four tests were performed introducing errors in latitude and longitude in the APS into the platform. The errors introduced had the same characteristics as those measured in the initial tests, in order for the simulation tests to be as similar as possible to the real situation. The tests performed with positioning errors only did not lead to false misalignment detection. However, introducing positioning errors and a 4° VOR misalignment error, a misalignment of 3.99° was observed during the flight test. This is a value greater than the maximum one allowed by the regulations, and the system indicates the VOR misalignment. Five flight inspection tests were performed. In addition to the APS errors, tests with a modulation error were also conducted. Introducing a 4° VOR misalignment in conjunction with modulation error, a misalignment of 4.02° was observed, resulting in successful misalignment detection.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7180946
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71809462020-04-30 The Feasibility of Remotely Piloted Aircrafts for VOR Flight Inspection de Oliveira Costa, Diogo Oliveira, Neusa Maria Franco d’Amore, Roberto Sensors (Basel) Article This article analyzes the use of Remotely Piloted Aircrafts (RPA) in VOR (Very High Frequency Omnidirectional Range) flight inspection. Initially, tests were performed to check whether the Autopilot Positioning System (APS) met the regulatory requirements. The results of these tests indicated that the APS provided information within the standard regulations. A Hardware in the Loop (HIL) platform was implemented to perform flight tests following the waypoints generated by a mission automation routine. One test was performed without introducing disturbance into the proposed test platform. The other four tests were performed introducing errors in latitude and longitude in the APS into the platform. The errors introduced had the same characteristics as those measured in the initial tests, in order for the simulation tests to be as similar as possible to the real situation. The tests performed with positioning errors only did not lead to false misalignment detection. However, introducing positioning errors and a 4° VOR misalignment error, a misalignment of 3.99° was observed during the flight test. This is a value greater than the maximum one allowed by the regulations, and the system indicates the VOR misalignment. Five flight inspection tests were performed. In addition to the APS errors, tests with a modulation error were also conducted. Introducing a 4° VOR misalignment in conjunction with modulation error, a misalignment of 4.02° was observed, resulting in successful misalignment detection. MDPI 2020-03-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7180946/ /pubmed/32244311 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20071947 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
de Oliveira Costa, Diogo
Oliveira, Neusa Maria Franco
d’Amore, Roberto
The Feasibility of Remotely Piloted Aircrafts for VOR Flight Inspection
title The Feasibility of Remotely Piloted Aircrafts for VOR Flight Inspection
title_full The Feasibility of Remotely Piloted Aircrafts for VOR Flight Inspection
title_fullStr The Feasibility of Remotely Piloted Aircrafts for VOR Flight Inspection
title_full_unstemmed The Feasibility of Remotely Piloted Aircrafts for VOR Flight Inspection
title_short The Feasibility of Remotely Piloted Aircrafts for VOR Flight Inspection
title_sort feasibility of remotely piloted aircrafts for vor flight inspection
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7180946/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32244311
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20071947
work_keys_str_mv AT deoliveiracostadiogo thefeasibilityofremotelypilotedaircraftsforvorflightinspection
AT oliveiraneusamariafranco thefeasibilityofremotelypilotedaircraftsforvorflightinspection
AT damoreroberto thefeasibilityofremotelypilotedaircraftsforvorflightinspection
AT deoliveiracostadiogo feasibilityofremotelypilotedaircraftsforvorflightinspection
AT oliveiraneusamariafranco feasibilityofremotelypilotedaircraftsforvorflightinspection
AT damoreroberto feasibilityofremotelypilotedaircraftsforvorflightinspection