Cargando…

Monitoring Mixing Processes Using Ultrasonic Sensors and Machine Learning

Mixing is one of the most common processes across food, chemical, and pharmaceutical manufacturing. Real-time, in-line sensors are required for monitoring, and subsequently optimising, essential processes such as mixing. Ultrasonic sensors are low-cost, real-time, in-line, and applicable to characte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bowler, Alexander L., Bakalis, Serafim, Watson, Nicholas J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7180958/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32218142
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20071813
_version_ 1783525941797978112
author Bowler, Alexander L.
Bakalis, Serafim
Watson, Nicholas J.
author_facet Bowler, Alexander L.
Bakalis, Serafim
Watson, Nicholas J.
author_sort Bowler, Alexander L.
collection PubMed
description Mixing is one of the most common processes across food, chemical, and pharmaceutical manufacturing. Real-time, in-line sensors are required for monitoring, and subsequently optimising, essential processes such as mixing. Ultrasonic sensors are low-cost, real-time, in-line, and applicable to characterise opaque systems. In this study, a non-invasive, reflection-mode ultrasonic measurement technique was used to monitor two model mixing systems. The two systems studied were honey-water blending and flour-water batter mixing. Classification machine learning models were developed to predict if materials were mixed or not mixed. Regression machine learning models were developed to predict the time remaining until mixing completion. Artificial neural networks, support vector machines, long short-term memory neural networks, and convolutional neural networks were tested, along with different methods for engineering features from ultrasonic waveforms in both the time and frequency domain. Comparisons between using a single sensor and performing multisensor data fusion between two sensors were made. Classification accuracies of up to 96.3% for honey-water blending and 92.5% for flour-water batter mixing were achieved, along with R(2) values for the regression models of up to 0.977 for honey-water blending and 0.968 for flour-water batter mixing. Each prediction task produced optimal performance with different algorithms and feature engineering methods, vindicating the extensive comparison between different machine learning approaches.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7180958
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-71809582020-04-30 Monitoring Mixing Processes Using Ultrasonic Sensors and Machine Learning Bowler, Alexander L. Bakalis, Serafim Watson, Nicholas J. Sensors (Basel) Article Mixing is one of the most common processes across food, chemical, and pharmaceutical manufacturing. Real-time, in-line sensors are required for monitoring, and subsequently optimising, essential processes such as mixing. Ultrasonic sensors are low-cost, real-time, in-line, and applicable to characterise opaque systems. In this study, a non-invasive, reflection-mode ultrasonic measurement technique was used to monitor two model mixing systems. The two systems studied were honey-water blending and flour-water batter mixing. Classification machine learning models were developed to predict if materials were mixed or not mixed. Regression machine learning models were developed to predict the time remaining until mixing completion. Artificial neural networks, support vector machines, long short-term memory neural networks, and convolutional neural networks were tested, along with different methods for engineering features from ultrasonic waveforms in both the time and frequency domain. Comparisons between using a single sensor and performing multisensor data fusion between two sensors were made. Classification accuracies of up to 96.3% for honey-water blending and 92.5% for flour-water batter mixing were achieved, along with R(2) values for the regression models of up to 0.977 for honey-water blending and 0.968 for flour-water batter mixing. Each prediction task produced optimal performance with different algorithms and feature engineering methods, vindicating the extensive comparison between different machine learning approaches. MDPI 2020-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7180958/ /pubmed/32218142 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20071813 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Bowler, Alexander L.
Bakalis, Serafim
Watson, Nicholas J.
Monitoring Mixing Processes Using Ultrasonic Sensors and Machine Learning
title Monitoring Mixing Processes Using Ultrasonic Sensors and Machine Learning
title_full Monitoring Mixing Processes Using Ultrasonic Sensors and Machine Learning
title_fullStr Monitoring Mixing Processes Using Ultrasonic Sensors and Machine Learning
title_full_unstemmed Monitoring Mixing Processes Using Ultrasonic Sensors and Machine Learning
title_short Monitoring Mixing Processes Using Ultrasonic Sensors and Machine Learning
title_sort monitoring mixing processes using ultrasonic sensors and machine learning
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7180958/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32218142
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20071813
work_keys_str_mv AT bowleralexanderl monitoringmixingprocessesusingultrasonicsensorsandmachinelearning
AT bakalisserafim monitoringmixingprocessesusingultrasonicsensorsandmachinelearning
AT watsonnicholasj monitoringmixingprocessesusingultrasonicsensorsandmachinelearning